TestRunner status

2005-05-26 Thread Michelle Caisse
TestRunner is a project to automate running the TCK for all databases, identity types, security settings, schemas, mappings, and test cases with a single maven invocation. We discussed doing the hard stuff either in maven or with an extended java/JUnit TestRunner. It seems possible to do it i

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 20, 9 am PST

2005-05-26 Thread Craig Russell
Attendees: Michelle Caisse, Michael Bouschen, Martin Zaun, Craig Russell Agenda: 1. Test status (Michelle) 4 types of errors that cause most of the problems. Cleanup problem JDO-48, others might be JPOX issues. Forwarded to jdo-dev alias. AI: JPOX developers please respond to email. Michell

JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 27, 9 am PST

2005-05-26 Thread Michelle Caisse
Hi, We will have our regular meeting Friday, May 27 at 9 am PST to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. Dial-in numbers are: 866 230-6968 294-0479# International: +1 865 544-7856 Agenda: Test status (Michelle) Test runner issues (Michelle) Test cleanup fix (Michael W) Next issues (Michael

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Andy, On May 26, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote: What is this relationship causing the issue ? I'm guessing a Map in Person of . It is a perfectly valid thing for an impl to want to put a PK on any table. It is also a valid thing for an impl to add additional columns where require

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Michelle Caisse
Andy, Yes, this is a different issue. Using the fixed the previous problem I was running into. In the TCK, we are starting with pre-defined schemas and mappings from the classes to the schemas. There are other valid schema/mapping sets, but we can't just let the vendors autogenerate schem

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Michelle Caisse
Andy, I see that you and Craig had a discussion about the join table pk issue on the jpox forum http://www.jpox.org/servlet/forum/viewthread?thread=1975 -- Michelle Michelle Caisse wrote: Hi, Andy, Andy Jefferson wrote: Do you have an idea of when you might support this? The new metada

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Andy Jefferson
> I've done that, but then JPOX seems to want a primary key in the join > table and supplies it, though there is none in the schema or metadata. > > [java] [FATAL] tck - Exception during setUp or runtest: > EMPLOYEE_PHONENO_TYPE (PHONENO,EMPID,ADPT_PK_IDX,"TYPE") VALUES (?,?,?,?) > [java]

Re: Patch for JDO-48

2005-05-26 Thread Michelle Caisse
Hi Michael, This is great! I will add it. To be able to edit Wiki pages you just have to register and log in. There's something at the top right of the page that you click, maybe "User Preferences" or something next to that link. After you log in, the page will have an Edit link instead o

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Michelle Caisse
Hi, Andy, Andy Jefferson wrote: Do you have an idea of when you might support this? The new metadata tests I'm working on use the company model and this mapping, so I'm wondering if I should bother to temporarily remap them for debugging. sometime in the next month hopefully. Mayb

Re: Patch for JDO-48

2005-05-26 Thread Michael Watzek
Hi Michelle, what do I have to do to edit that page. I can see the subsection "Cleanup" but it seems I do not have permission to change it. Below you find a proposal for "Cleanup" description: The TCK uses the JUnit testing framework. JUnit encourages test classes to separate the real task t

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Andy Jefferson
> > Do you have an idea of when you might support this? The new metadata > > tests I'm working on use the company model and this mapping, so I'm > > wondering if I should bother to temporarily remap them for debugging. > sometime in the next month hopefully. Maybe sooner ... You can just use the

Re: tck test status

2005-05-26 Thread Andy Jefferson
> >OK. You'll just have to put it down to "not currently supported by JPOX" > > with that MetaData definition. We support M-N just in a different way. > > Do you have an idea of when you might support this? The new metadata > tests I'm working on use the company model and this mapping, so I'm > wo