OK, so I suppose you'll have to dig into the source to see if any log is
issued, and hopefully understand what happened.
My 2 cents.
Le 9 sept. 2013 07:54, "Dirk Heinrichs" a écrit :
> Am 08.09.2013 22:02, schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
>
> > So, I suppose your slave was unavailable or busy (did you d
Am 08.09.2013 22:02, schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
> So, I suppose your slave was unavailable or busy (did you double-check
> the builds that ran on it?)
Yes, I did. It was available, but idle for about 2 hours while the
second build was started on another slave. Neither the master, nor the
slave log
On Friday, September 6, 2013 12:39:54 AM UTC-4, Gaurang shah wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I have my automation project configured on the Jenkins, Now everytime a
> test case fails management is interested in knowing the reason.
>
> Is it a bug in automation ?
> is it a product bug ?
> is it a timing
Maven question. Please better post on Maven users mailing list next time.
As for your issue, move your log4j.properties file to src/test/resources.
Cheers
2013/9/6 Gaurang shah
> Hi Guy,
>
> I have configured log4j in my project, however the problem is when i run
> that in jenkins i get follo
Not totally sure what you want, but seems more like a maven question than a
jenkins one.
2013/9/6 Gaurang shah
> Hi Guys,
>
> In the surefire reports on jenkins when a test case fails it shows both
> stacktrace and stdout. Is there any way it shows stdout even when test case
> passes.
>
>
> Gau
>From my experience, and from what I think I've read somewhere (didn't check
the code), Jenkins will indeed try to launch the build on the last slave if
it's available for obvious reasons.
So, I suppose your slave was unavailable or busy (did you double-check the
builds that ran on it?) (see in th
+1.
kill -9 as a first step is a very very very bad idea.
2013/9/4 Richard Bywater
> Personally I wouldn't "kill -9" the process straight away as then the
> process has no chance to clean up after itself...
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:57 AM, wrote:
>
>> How did you start Jenkins?
>>
>
Hello,
thank you for the suggestion - but I already tried that but it didn't
change the behaviour.
On Thursday, September 5, 2013 8:52:54 PM UTC+2, John Russell wrote:
>
> I find I have much better luck in "Execute shell" build steps if I put
>
> #!/bin/bash at the top.
>
> It tends to make the
plugin a.b.c pom has one error
Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not find artifact.
a.b.c.pom:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local
POM @ line 5, column 11 -> [Help 2]
the plugin a.b.c has a pom
where parent poms relative path is given
nightly build runs without any prob