Re: [LARTC] TCP window based shaping

Ed Wildgoose wrote: i'm just trying to slow the traffic (it's for my master|degree|pedigree thesis, so i don't want to waste all my life on this) without changing the window size. How do we fit this thing into the linux QOS architecture anyway? i'm writing a scheduler that just delay the ac

Re: [LARTC] TCP window based shaping

I did notice that there was a netfilter module which did window tracking. It's in POM under the fairly experimental section I think. Haven't checked it out, but there could be some interesting code in there Ed W ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.d

Re: [LARTC] priorizing vlans in a bridge

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, this is my Linux Box LAN 1 -|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \| |eth0--|- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | /|

Re: [LARTC] Help!!! Bandwith Control with a NAT machine

Miguel Ángel Domínguez Durán wrote: Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I've been working with this for a few weeks and I'm getting sick... I'm trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is c

Re: [LARTC] priorizing vlans in a bridge

If I use the vlans interfaces eth0.1 and eth0.2 in the tc statements, I would have two independent root qdiscs on each interface, and this won´t let me prioritize LAN1 over LAN2. That's why I set this up all on eth0, which is the interface that sees all the entire traffic. Any other idea? Thanks fo

RE: [LARTC] Redundant Links Routing

Maybe a better way of asking this question is if I use link load balancing and one of the links fail would the remaining link continue to function normally without interruption to service. The second question is concerning the differences in link speeds will it degrade performance in comparison to

Re: [LARTC] TCP window based shaping

i'm just trying to slow the traffic (it's for my master|degree|pedigree thesis, so i don't want to waste all my life on this) without changing the window size. How do we fit this thing into the linux QOS architecture anyway? i'm writing a scheduler that just delay the ack rate (it's in a v

Re: [LARTC] load sharing

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:39:26 -0500, Payal Rathod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I am taking my machine loaded with Mandrake 10.0 and Suse 9.1 to my > friend's place. She has 2 different ISP providing pppoe connections > in her office. She has allowed me try load balancing on my machine on > Sun

[LARTC] load sharing

Hi, I am taking my machine loaded with Mandrake 10.0 and Suse 9.1 to my friend's place. She has 2 different ISP providing pppoe connections in her office. She has allowed me try load balancing on my machine on Sunday. I just wanted to know does lartc stand good with pppoe? I have heard conflict

Re: [LARTC] priorizing vlans in a bridge

Hi, You should use eth0.1 and eth0.2 in your tc statements ... ciao charles On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 23:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, this is my Linux Box > > >LAN 1 -|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | > | \

[LARTC] Help!!! Bandwith Control with a NAT machine

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I've been working with this for a few weeks and I'm getting sick... I'm trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and et

[LARTC] SNAT and multiply real addresses ?

hi, I have a real networks on the eth0 side and real network on the eth1 side. a.a.a.0/24 x.x.x.0/24 y.y.y.2/24 <> y.y.y.1/24 <===>INTERNET z.z.z.0/24 I want to nat those behind eth0 to go out as y.y.y.0/24 (eth1 is with another address different gw and address, so that i'm using eth1:0

Re: [LARTC] TCP window based shaping

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 02:57:59AM +, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > > I like the sound of this idea, but I don't follow the details? > > Certainly it seems to me that you can do most of the work by only > looking at outgoing ACK packets. For example with certain assumptions > we can simply measure