[LARTC] Gre Tos

Hi, how does gre tunnels handle the TOS/DS field in the encapsulated packet? Is the value copied to the encapsulating ip header?     thx jason___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

[LARTC] nat for nonconnected network

Hi, how do you nat an address pool that is routed to a router but the router does not have/contain that network. For example:   [isp 1.2.3.4] --[customer router 1.2.3.5]->[dmz network]   [route for 200.0.0.0/x get sent to customer router this address pool is assigned to customer, the

RE: [LARTC] failover routing

?ThanksSew On 2/7/06, comp.techs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, our network has a hand full of 2k servers that use silent rip. We use 2 Linux gateways with separate isp's. Each gateway does a ' default-originate'  to advertise its default route in ri

RE: [LARTC] failover routing

Hi, our network has a hand full of 2k servers that use silent rip. We use 2 Linux gateways with separate isp's. Each gateway does a ' default-originate'  to advertise its default route in ripv2 (with on having a different metric). The main gateway has a ping script written in shell that will

[LARTC] prio test results

Hi, below are some test results from implementing a prio qdisc 'that is also below'.The qdisc is attacted to a vlan interface for my external network. Both tests were runat the same time.The links are policed at 6.0M 'by our provider'. 192.168.70.1 --> 192.168.30.1 My question is: If using a pr

RE: [LARTC] Gred/dsmark/htb

: comp.techsCc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSubject: Re: [LARTC] Gred/dsmark/htb comp.techs wrote:> Hi, I am trying to get assured forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I am using.> The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. My problem i

[LARTC] Gred/dsmark/htb

Hi, I am trying to get assured forwarding/expedited forwarding with gred and htb working. Below is the script I am using. The following steps are what I thing is how the script works. My problem is that if I remove the HTB qdisc from the script and have the GREDS parent as the dsmark it works,

[LARTC] HTB and GRED for AF and EF services

Hi, just wondering if this type of configuration would be possible for using AF and EF classes.        HTB (6.0M)   --GRED 5 (AF1)   --HTB(1M) [is it possible to have this with a 1M rate and a 6M ceiling?] --GRED [3 greds using grio] VQ1 -3   --GRED 4 (AF2)

RE: [LARTC] multicast over GRE tunnel

Title: [LARTC] multicast over GRE tunnel Hi, if this is for the purpose of using OSPF. You must setup Point-to-Point interfaces. That is when giving your local gre tunnel ip address you must also specify a peer address.     jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve EckmannSent: W

[LARTC] GRED & HTB

Hi, I am tring to setup AF on my router using GRED/HTB. I plan to mark and set the DSCP with iptables and the ingress qdisc to set the tc_index for the proper GRED vq(1-12).   My question is: Is there a way to allow for priority between the af classes and within the af classes? also would it be

[LARTC] Marking DSCP

Hi, what would be the easiest way to mark packets for AF. For example ingress www traffic being marked as AF31?   thx jason___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

RE: [LARTC] ip route mpath rr problem

Title: [LARTC] ip route mpath rr problem Hi, I have been trying to do something simular using 2 gre tunnels between linux routers. I have used Policy based routing with seperate routing tables, with kernel patches such as http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw. I also tried both per flow/per packet

[LARTC] multipath

Hi, I have setup a ECMP route between two linux systems. I do not have the equalize enabled. This would be flow based. After sending a few ftp/scp sessions I noticed that the 'per flow based' was jumping between interfaces for just one session. My question is, would this be a result of the rou

[LARTC] Multipath TE

Hi, is there any way to route traffic between 2 ECMP routes dependent on the current utilization(packet loss/bandwidth)? For example using OSPF on 2 linux routers with ECMP gre tunnels between them. If the bandwidth on one tunnel starts to exceed a given value the "mechanism" will start sending

[LARTC] multipath routing

Hi, I have set up multipath routing using two gre tunnels. The multipath routes are setup via (zebra/ospf). I managed to modify zebra not to include the 'equalize' in the multpath route, and set the weights 1:2.  My question is that after doing 4+ ftp transfers I still do not see much traffic on

[LARTC] load balancing

Hi, I have 2 routers  that are connected using 2 gre tunnels over ipsec, and ospf. Ospf sets up the equal cost route, but uses the 'equalize' in the route. Is there a way to remove/disable packet based load balancing? I would just like to do a flow based load balance?   thx jason

RE: [LARTC] multipath routing

arouting decision has been made for the first packet, packets going tothat same host will go through the same interface till the cachingtime has gone by.On 10/26/05, comp.techs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance  between two interfaces.>>>&g

RE: [LARTC] multipath routing

the cachingtime has gone by.On 10/26/05, comp.techs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance  between two interfaces.>>>> ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop> via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2>> Where ne

[LARTC] multipath routing

Hi, I am tring to us ip route to load balance  between two interfaces.   ip route add equalize 10.200.1.0/24 nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta nexthop via 10.200.0.2 dev neta2   Where neta and neta2 are gre tunnels.   Testing show that packets travel  in a single sided manner.   Do I need to use

RE: [LARTC] gre/ipsec loadbalancing

Hi, I managed to get the equal load balancing working using the sch_teql device, using two gre tunnels over ipsec.   thx jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of comp.techsSent: Wed 10/19/2005 4:04 PMTo: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nlSubject: [LARTC] gre/ipsec loadbalancing Hi, I have the foll

[LARTC] loadbalance/gre tunnels

Hi, I have two systems each with 2 two gre tunnels over ipsec. The tunnels are setup to loadbalance using 'ip route'.   Using ping from one server to the other I get equal results via the two gre tunnels, but when I try a large ftp transfer the utilization of one tunnel is 90% and the other 10%.

[LARTC] (no subject)

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results woul

[LARTC] gre/ipsec loadbalancing

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would

[LARTC] load balance with gre/ipsec

Hi, I have the following setup. Two linux systems with two [test] external interfaces encrypted with ipsec [transport]. Two gre tunnels that pass 10.200.0.0/24 and 10.200.1.0/24 network traffic. Testing the balanced tunnels I would setup iptraf on one and ping from the other. The results would b