On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:22 +0200, Christian Benvenuti wrote:
Hi Mark,
Hi,
What exactly are the tokens?
I thought each token allowed the sending of one byte, that tokens are
stored in a bucket that can hold a max of burst tokens, and that this
bucket is filled with tokens at rate.
Hi Mark,
Hi,
What exactly are the tokens?
I thought each token allowed the sending of one byte, that tokens are
stored in a bucket that can hold a max of burst tokens, and that this
bucket is filled with tokens at rate.
But theory does not seem to explain the tc -s .. output in the
examples
Hi,
What exactly happens if the sum of the children classes rate is bigger
than the parent's?
I would say that in most cases it would be a misconfiguration, especially
if you have more layers of HTB classes. The bw you configure with rate
is not going to be reserved properly if you do not
gypsy wrote:
Bugzilla-Redirect wrote:
Yes, the output is below:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:09:2A:A6:F6
inet addr:10.0.0.50 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4244867 errors:0
I was not aware that segmentation offloading would cause a problem... and I
do believe it's on.
I think I'll just stuck with the high mtu for the moment then, as I would
rather have the CPU savings
then more accurate traffic controlling.
Thanks.
-Ryan Power
At 07:48 AM 9/18/2006, Andy
Bugzilla-Redirect wrote:
Yes, the output is below:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:09:2A:A6:F6
inet addr:10.0.0.50 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4244867 errors:0 dropped:0
Yes, the output is below:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:09:2A:A6:F6
inet addr:10.0.0.50 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:4244867 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX
PROTECTED]Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]13/09/2006 07:00Paralartc@mailman.ds9a.nlccAsunto[LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problemEric, here's the information you requested with the
mtu set at 1500 (see further below
(a linux
wan router on a 100Mbit lan with 5Mbps upload/dowload to the Internet.
We will see if I run into the same issues...Regards,Eric Janz Bugzilla-Redirect [EMAIL PROTECTED]Enviado por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]09/09/2006 21:56Paralartc@mailman.ds9a.nlccAsunto[LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problem
(Charlie
]:~#
-
Thanks.
-Ryan Power
At 04:00 AM 9/12/2006, you wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:36:27 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: htb traffic shaping problem (Charlie Meyer)
To: lartc
Eric,
I've attached the output from the command you requested below.
I'm using kernel 2.6.17.12 and tc version ss060323. I'm have a nforce4
onboard giggabit controller using the forcedeth driver, if that makes a
difference.
Charlie,
I'll take a look at the Apache model for throttling,
Hi!
Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface?
I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) :
BOND0 - ETH0 + ETH1
BOND1 - ETH2 + ETH3
(
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
)
HTB work very well with Class over BOND0.
If I add
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I believe there are some unresolved memory management issues with HTB.
It looks like deleting the qdisc is causing some use after free or
memory corruption problems.
See:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6681
I don't use HTB so I have no idea if this
I solved my problem by myself, by studying devik's HTB manual:
http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm
Here are my remarks for those browsing the mailing list archive.
The line that made me realize what I was doing wrong is: The rate
supplied for a parent should be the sum of
a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a
bridge
with
2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network)
machine does not have any IP
there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2
eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0
i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i
Bernard abno wrote:
Hello,
What does this line mean :
HTB: quantum of class 10200 is small. Consider r2q change.
And how should I fix it ? I have dsl 1mb connection and 2 cards
(realtek-8139C and realtek-8100B/8139D)
Could the above line cause this ? :
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed
Hello Devik!
Thanks for your help. And many thanks to everybody from the group who has
been thinking on my problem.
It seems i resolved my problem - there is no connection loss while reseting
htb, but I'll be observing it's stability in a few days.
I have no words to write what a STUPID mistake it
: devik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lartc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: HTB 3.13 please help
From the stats is seems that no data are queued - as if nobody
is sending them. You are using smp kernel, is your box SMP ?
I
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lartc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: HTB 3.13 please help
From the stats is seems that no data are queued - as if nobody
is sending them. You are using smp kernel, is your box SMP ?
I haven't seen many smp
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: HTB 3.13 please help
as you can see, NO packets are going thru. You have to look
to other classes as well as to ifconfig and tc -s qdisc show dev xxx
to see wherw packets are lost.
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
From the stats is seems that no data are queued - as if nobody
is sending them. You are using smp kernel, is your box SMP ?
I haven't seen many smp+htb boxes thus there might be possibility
of a bug...
devik
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've attached outputs for eth0 and eth1.
too.
The difference i could see at once is that there is no connection loss when
i'm starting htb.
- Original Message -
From: devik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: lartc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: HTB 3.13 please help
From
I've attached outputs for eth0 and eth1.
I was trying to get this script running. I've added one class for my NATed
BOX, and it helped. Shaping was stable almost one day but then i added prio
0 to eth0 filters and prio 0 for eth1 filters it has braken. So i removed
every prio 0 and reboot the box
On Thursday 24 June 2004 06:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Boxman writes:
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 01:57, Svetozar Mihailov wrote:
Shouldn't this:
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio
10
be parent 2:?
Ed W
That change nothing. I
Jason Boxman writes:
On Wednesday 23 June 2004 01:57, Svetozar Mihailov wrote:
Shouldn't this:
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
be parent 2:?
Ed W
That change nothing. I have running system with 800 PC , 4 classes for
each. There is no difference
I have a fiber connection to MAN1, an ethernet connection to MAN2
(another city), and an ethernet connection to the WAN. My question was
(well actually my new question is...) if i can shape all of the traffic
using a computer with 4 nics (2xMAN,1 WAN,1 LAN) and what delays will this
of the packets.
Thanks again.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Stef Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lartc [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: HTB and metro+int. limits
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 21:27
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: HTB and metro+int. limits
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 21:27, Alex wrote:
Thanks for your replay, it really helps, but to take the question
further,
from what you have seen in my sample script, how should I classify
Thanks for your replay, it really helps, but to take the question further,
from what you have seen in my sample script, how should I classify packets
with tc ? I don't know how to put them in separate classes,. What I have
in my script will only shape metro traffic, but for international how
Daniel Brahneborg wrote:
I found a little workaround, but I'm not really happy with it.
SNIP
I then use iptables -j MARK to set a '1' if the traffic comes from
eth1. If not, it should end up in 1:2, and 1:1 and 1:2 should be able
to borrow from each other.
What I do now is to use ipfilter to
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 19:59, Steen Suder, privat wrote:
Daniel Brahneborg wrote:
I found a little workaround, but I'm not really happy with it.
SNIP
I then use iptables -j MARK to set a '1' if the traffic comes from
eth1. If not, it should end up in 1:2, and 1:1 and 1:2 should be
As I understand, in HTB you are able to map traffic to a queue named
direct_queue.
This queue is initialized in function htb_init(), and is a
qdisc not a class, is this right??
it is class with implicitly attached queue
Another question of interest is how can I use it. Is this queue
Ehh it is the same for 2 years. luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/ ..
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jingsong Fu wrote:
Hi Devik,
Where can I find the HTB source code for kernel and tc?
Thanks,
Jingsong
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok here is solution.
1) the filter is not swallowed. For inner filters you
have to use tc filter show dev lo parent 1:1. If
you miss parent keyword nothing will be shown.
2) the code you attached can't work. You wanted to use default
keyword to direct packets into 1:1 and then use
34 matches
Mail list logo
