Leonard,
We had a lot of discussion about Subsequent Citations a while back. I think
March of 2009 might be the most recent. I don't know if anything has changed
in Legacy. I know I logged some requests.
Think of a template-driven (i.e., SourceWriter) citation as consisting of 4
groupings of fiel
Ward, I just responded to Paula on Subsequent Citation Details and yes, I
should have changed to a new tread.
I have been using the Basic Source templates and not the SourceWriter.
This is my first serious attempt in becoming familiar with Legacy, but
the SourceWriter is similar to that used in FT
hives are at the bottom of each LUG e-mail. There are
many discussions about lumping/splitting, and a few about subsequent
citations.
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "gambol"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Controlling Subsequent Citation D
ation Details [WAS: Legacy
7.5 and source citation import?]
Ward, I just responded to Paula on Subsequent Citation Details and yes, I
should have changed to a new tread.
I have been using the Basic Source templates and not the SourceWriter.
This is my first serious attempt in becoming familiar
Ward, We are in agreement that date/place type information should be in
the source detail. When I imported my FTM GEDCOM, the source detail went
to Legacy's text field. To correct this on a broad field would require
programing effort and generally programers are not genealogist. I was a
programin
5 matches
Mail list logo
