Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> Also, does it update after every commit? And does a change to the
> generator do an update too?
>
Hi Josh,
nope, it's a manual process that I run every once in a while.
Doxygen itself is rather heaviweight, so you really don't want to
run that on a server, let alone for
On 02/13/2012 09:12 PM, julien2412 wrote:
You were right Michael about moz, i did a "rm -Rf unxlng*" and the errors
quoted in my first post didn't appear again. (strange because i had done a
make clean on root level).
Now i've got these errors :
In file included from ../../../xpcom/glue/nsINIPar
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least).
Winfried
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listi
> I actually waited a lot longer than promised and there is still no
> response from any developer using Windows.
You misunderstand how this works. It's the Windows-based developers
who have to make sure they don't break the Linux build, not the other
way around.
--tml
___
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 01:33:57PM +0100, David Tardon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have converted 6 modules to gbuild on branch feature/gbuild_java:
> javaunohelper, jurt, jvmaccess, jvmfwk, ridljar and unoil. It builds
> fine here and smoketest finishes with status OK, but some of the modules
> contai
Le 13/02/2012 17:33, Stephan Bergmann a écrit :
> On 02/13/2012 12:34 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>> On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 08:47 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
>>> When building the master (Ubuntu 11.10, x86_64), it fails and says that
>>> the problem is inside nlpsolver. If I try to build nlpsol
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:06:17PM +, Kate Goss wrote:
> Please see attached.
> From 099415fb77eddd7d211ae6ed547cb31b10484a37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kate Goss
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:57:46 +
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Remove unused method
> ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet::openTabl
Thorsten,
> That stuff is currently generated by a little shell script - I'm not
> particularly attached to it, and wouldn't mind perl or python there,
> but php so far is not used throughout the build system, maybe we can
> avoid it here, too?
>
> At any rate, rather ugly conversion of your beaut
Thank you to every one who's offered me advice.
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:08:20 +
Caolán McNamara wrote:
> I don't think we have any way to override our breakiterators from
> extensions.
Ah well, I'll just have to try to get Thai spell-checking working for
myself and then worry about sharing m
Hi Németh,
Németh László wrote (13-02-12 16:20)
Lightproof (from “lightweight proofreader”) is a Python grammar
checker framework for LibreOffice. Default English, Hungarian and
[...]
Thanks for the info and the checker!
We had some people before in Netherlands community active with spell
ch
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||45991
--- Comment #185 from Cor Nouws 2012-
On 12 February 2012 23:51, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Do not push them without improvement, make check fails for me.
> Attached diff solves one problem but still there is something wrong.
Well, I was fooled by smoketest/com/sun/star/comp/smoketest/makefile.mk
There is javamaker involved, but the produc
Hi Korrawit,
Korrawit Pruegsanusak píše v So 04. 02. 2012 v 00:36 +0700:
> As the 3.5 RC3 is approaching, IMHO it's time to trigger the update of
> wikihelp :-)
I know that you already know that; but just for the records of the ML,
done :-)
The 3.4 help has been moved to a separate section toge
Hi,
first of all: thanks for this effort, which should have been done when this
lucene dependency was introduced in the first place in OOo times.
But...
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:17:49PM +0100, Radek Doulik wrote:
> > * This implementation is using the master branch of CLucene's git,
> > wit
Hi Ivan,
Ivan Timofeev píše v Po 13. 02. 2012 v 19:47 +0400:
> > So I've pushed it now :-)
>
> Thanks!! Is it worth being in 3-5? :)
Thanks for that! Yeah, worth having there too, the empty space is
annoying ;-) - pushed.
Thank you,
Kendy
___
Libre
Hi,
Please see attached.
Best Regards,
Kate Goss
From 099415fb77eddd7d211ae6ed547cb31b10484a37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kate Goss
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:57:46 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Remove unused method
ODatabaseMetaDataResultSet::openTablesTypes( )
---
.../odbcbase/ODatabaseMet
Hi Winfried,
Winfried Donkers píše v Čt 09. 02. 2012 v 08:03 +0100:
> The patch itself is not attached to this mail (size 1.2MB), but
> attached to the bug itself.
>
> The patch file is so large because the file labels.xcu has almost all
> lines changed.
>
> This patch addresses problems that w
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
From 193f0208edeba24a820e9fe098456f5412d5e3a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santiago Martinez
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:31:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused code.
---
editeng/inc/editeng/numitem.hxx |1 -
editeng/source/item
Hi,
Are you sure this is the correct file? When I open the file I only see
OpenOffice and StarOffice entries. Maybe someone else can check what
he/she sees.
Greetings,
Rob Snelders
On 13-02-12 22:06, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 2/13/12 9:44 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
If you can attach the file
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
All my future contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under LGPLv3+ / MPL.
I'll also add myself to the wiki.
> So it sounds like you did an excellent job; what's next ? an easy hack
> perhaps ? or more unused code ? :-)
It would be
On 2/13/12 9:44 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> If you can attach the file, that would be most helpful. I am unable to
> reasonably extract the patch from the message - sorry for that, but the
> way that works for me flawlessly for text-only patches failed on this
> binary one :-(
No problem. You kn
This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
From ecde7d2545f9aff68d3b898b2722d7fd1cf2578d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santiago Martinez
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused code.
---
svx/inc/svx/xtable.hxx|1 -
svx/source/xoutdev/xta
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 19:39 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 06:18 PM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> >> Noob's question:
> > A function that is only used by an inline function will be treated as
> > unused by callcatcher? Or is it a result of compiler's optimizations?
Yeah, gcc, even in -O0
Hi Italo,
Italo Vignoli píše v Po 13. 02. 2012 v 12:27 +0100:
> I have patched the biblio.odb document with LibreOffice entries (got rid
> of the old OOo entries). The patch is below to be checked, but I do not
> understand if I have to attach the patched document as well. Please
> help.
If you
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 21:16 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Monday, 2012-02-13 12:40:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> > Attached change (not yet committed to master) will fix a crasher bug
> > which is one of the bugs reported in
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?i
Hi Tor,
On Monday, 2012-02-13 13:31:11 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Do we really need to keep "analysis" and "date" as separate shared
> libraries? Would it be OK to move their source code over to the "sc"
> module, and merge their objects into the "sc" library, and their
> .component files into
Hi Kohei,
On Monday, 2012-02-13 12:40:11 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Attached change (not yet committed to master) will fix a crasher bug
> which is one of the bugs reported in
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45916
>
> It originally comes from
>
> https://issues.apache.org/o
You were right Michael about moz, i did a "rm -Rf unxlng*" and the errors
quoted in my first post didn't appear again. (strange because i had done a
make clean on root level).
Now i've got these errors :
In file included from ../../../xpcom/glue/nsINIParser.cpp:41:
In file included from ../../../x
Hi Michael,
On 13 February 2012 15:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Kate,
>
> On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:37 +, kate goss wrote:
> > Made available under the MPL/LGPLv3+
>
>They look lovely - thanks for that ! :-)
>
>Welcome to the project. Incidentally, it'd be quite useful to ha
Hi all,
for reference:
All contributions past, present and future made by me to LibreOffice
are available under the terms of the MPL / LGPLv3+.
Best Regards,
Kate Goss
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedes
This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of
this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received
this
On 02/13/2012 06:18 PM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
On 13.02.2012 21:08, nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
/Volumes/Raid0/core/solver/unxmacxi.pro/inc/svtools/ctrlbox.hxx: In
member function 'void FontSizeBox::SetUserValue(sal_Int64)':
/Volumes/Raid0/core/solver/unxmacxi.pro/inc/svtools/ctrlbox.hxx:563:
error
On 13.02.2012 22:22, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
[...]
A crash will be right here, inside Compile?..
No it does not.
Oh, pardon, did not noticed one-line if - return:
if ( pDocument->IsClipOrUndo() ) return;
I dared to push...
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
> ScFormulaCell::Compile:
>
> pCode = aComp.CompileString( rFormula );
> if ( pCodeOld )
> delete pCodeOld;
> if( !pCode->GetCodeError() )
> {
>
> A crash will be right here, inside Compile?..
No it do
Hi Kohei,
On 13.02.2012 21:40, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
The problem happened when calc was not able to
compile the formula string for whatever reason, in which case pCode
would remain NULL after the Compile is called in one of its
constructors.
Sorry, I did not test the bug, but...
ScFormulaCell:
Hi there,
Alexander just removed a load of gcc conditionals from master, but
there were a few I dropped from his patch to get some further input from
you.
We've decided (I think) in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45131 that 4.0.1
* cppu/inc/cppu/macros.hxx:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 15:02 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 13:01 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > apparently a SwFlowFrm::pPrecede was introduced, turning the SwFlowFrm
> > list from a singly linked list to a doubly linked list, without much
> > thought given
Attached change (not yet committed to master) will fix a crasher bug
which is one of the bugs reported in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45916
It originally comes from
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118851
There were several ways to think this as far as I could see.
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 00:08 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> That's the magic of OpenGrok :)
Ah ! ;-)
> I have sent a mail to the list before with the license
> (http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-January/024938.html)
> and I have just added my name onto the wiki list.
ON Unix, if evolution (the default choice for address data) SDBC
driver fails to load, then the address data wizard is completely
non-functional because it tries to use evolution anyway, even when the
user has selected another choice (e.g. thunderbird or ldap or "other"
- which should maybe be call
On 13.02.2012 21:08, nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
One of you broke the build of LibreOffice with your commit :-(
Please commit and push a fix ASAP!
[...]
/Volumes/Raid0/core/solver/unxmacxi.pro/inc/svtools/ctrlbox.hxx: In member
function 'void FontSizeBox::SetUserValue(sal_Int64)':
/V
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 18:08 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:39:51PM +0100, Radek Doulik wrote:
>
> > looks OK to me. I have cherry-picked it from master, because the
> > attached patch didn't apply.
>
> Oh, sorry, some difference between my work tree and pristine
> l
Hi Walter,
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 15:19 +0100, walter wrote:
> Using a different autogen.sh configuration all work fine and the build
> process generate the following installer:
Great :-) glad to hear that.
> I don’t know if the problem was jobs=8, cpu=8 or not using ‘—
> disable-binfilte
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:39:51PM +0100, Radek Doulik wrote:
> looks OK to me. I have cherry-picked it from master, because the
> attached patch didn't apply.
Oh, sorry, some difference between my work tree and pristine
libreoffice-3-5 must have made a mess.
The "sorted by concatenation" proble
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 23:11 +0100, Gert van Valkenhoef wrote:
> The code that interfaces with Lucene to do the indexing and searching is
> complete.
Great.
> I've also looked into where the HelpIndexerTool is currently used, and
> found these:
>
> - xmlhelp/source/cxxhelp/provider/databases.
Hi,
looks OK to me. I have cherry-picked it from master, because the
attached patch didn't apply.
Pushed. Thanks.
Cheers
Radek
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 19:27 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> getColumns() is a XDatabaseMetadata interface function to get the list
> of columns of a table and info o
Hi Elton, Michael,
On 13.02.2012 20:04, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 00:50 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
This patch removes 10 unused methods.
Lovely; if you 'git grep bNetLock' - I think we can remove that item
from the header, and it's remaining initialization too now (cou
On 02/13/2012 12:34 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 08:47 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
When building the master (Ubuntu 11.10, x86_64), it fails and says that
the problem is inside nlpsolver. If I try to build nlpsolver by
make nlpsolver
I get the following error messages :
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 17:10 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 3 unused methods.
Pushed ! :-) and that was the last queued up patch from you I think,
thanks for all the great work :-)
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engi
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 19:40 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> So, my attempt:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=19d80a257b0e5c9d45985e49f33493f38c5d5f10
>
> Ivan
Looks good to me, pushed that to 3-5 as well
C.
___
LibreOffice mail
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 17:09 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 12 unused methods.
Pushed with some conflicts removed,
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 17:07 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 8 unused methods.
Thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.f
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 12:01 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 11 unused methods.
Lovely, it seems our delay at reviewing caused a few conflicts with
others; hopefully you'll be able to pull / re-base any bits you have on
top of what I pushed here.
Thanks !
Hi Michael,
That's the magic of OpenGrok :)
I have sent a mail to the list before with the license
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-January/024938.html)
and I have just added my name onto the wiki list.
Best Regards,
Elton
--
Elton Chung
Administrator, Sponsor of mirror.la
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 00:50 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes 10 unused methods.
Lovely; if you 'git grep bNetLock' - I think we can remove that item
from the header, and it's remaining initialization too now (could you
hack that up) ? :-)
Similarly for bNotMasterCach
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 00:49 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch removes another 4 unused methods.
Thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 00:48 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> The patch removes 4 unused methods.
Pushed; thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@
On 13/02/12 15:28, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 16:21 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
This patch fixes some typos in comments.
Lovely - you have some magic means of finding bad comments ? :-)
Incidentally, it'd really help if you could send a blanket MPL/LGPL
Hi all,
all my past and future contributions to LibreOffice are available
under the MPL / LGPLv3+ unless stated otherwise.
Best,
Matúš
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffi
Hi there,
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 23:11 +0100, Gert van Valkenhoef wrote:
> Attached are initial implementations of the HelpIndexer and HelpSearch
> in C++ using CLucene, to replace the Java implementations using Lucene.
Wow - this is awesome :-)
Thanks so much for that; I hope it
On 13.02.2012 18:20, Caolán McNamara wrote:
So I've pushed it now :-)
Thanks!! Is it worth being in 3-5? :)
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 15:38 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 00:08 +, Björgvin Ragnarsson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Attached is my first contribution to Libreoffice
>
> Looks good to me, pushed now, thanks for this.
adding PUSHED tag dammit.
C.
On 13.02.2012 18:26, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 17:56 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
Hi Cedric, Kendy,
On 13.02.2012 14:24, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Could someone (kendy?) review and cherry-pick -s in -3-5 the following
commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 00:08 +, Björgvin Ragnarsson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Attached is my first contribution to Libreoffice
Looks good to me, pushed now, thanks for this.
C.
You should add yourself to
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers
and link back to your last email vi
Hi Catalin,
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 23:10 +0100, Catalin Iacob wrote:
> Contribution under LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Thanks ! :-) and welcome to the project. It'd be lovely to have a
blanket license statement for all your contributions that we can link
into:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org
Hi,
looks OK to me. Pushed. Thanks.
Cheers
Radek
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 18:44 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> With a PostgreSQL-SDBC database, Base query design does not allow the
> user to use groupings and aggregate functions.
>
> Change PostgreSQL-SDBC so that it declares to support Core S
Hi,
Lightproof (from “lightweight proofreader”) is a Python grammar
checker framework for LibreOffice. Default English, Hungarian and
Russian grammar checkers of LibreOffice 3.5 are based on Lightproof
(also the French Grammalecte:
http://extensions.libreoffice.org/extension-center/grammalecte).
Hi there,
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 16:21 +0800, Elton Chung wrote:
> This patch fixes some typos in comments.
Lovely - you have some magic means of finding bad comments ? :-)
Incidentally, it'd really help if you could send a blanket MPL/LGPLv3+
license mail to the list, so we can l
On 13/02/12 14:52, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Yes I vote for pushing this as you suggested. It is a cheap solution
for now, and done elsewhere in the code, so at least we are consistent
then. Saw the ideas from Markus and Stefan regarding the range name
dialog:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.o
Hi there,
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 16:20 +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
> Now, I summarize this as, if we're cross-compiling, we need 'gettext',
> but if we --disble-librsvg, we don't need neither 'gettext' nor 'glib'.
Sounds sensible to me :-)
> So, I'm purposing a *partial* patch (at
Hi Kate,
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:37 +, kate goss wrote:
> Made available under the MPL/LGPLv3+
They look lovely - thanks for that ! :-)
Welcome to the project. Incidentally, it'd be quite useful to have a
blanket license mail for your contributions we can link into here:
Hi Gert,
thanks for looking into this.
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 23:11 +0100, Gert van Valkenhoef wrote:
> Dear LibreOffice developers,
>
> Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44681
>
> Attached are initial implementations of the HelpIndexer and HelpSearch
> in C++ using CLucene, to
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 16:23 +, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> Is it possible to create an experimental alternative to the Thai
> break iterator that can be shared with other people as a LibreOffice
> extension?
I don't think we have any way to override our breakiterators from
extensions.
FWIW, i
On 13/02/12 15:47, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> the sc, sd, sw libraries already take forever to link with full debug,
>
> You link with full debug ? :-)
well i was actually surprised once that i do, but soon found out that
somebody ha
On Feb 13, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> but never any:
>
>git diff > /tmp/foo.diff
I was working from the latest released source. This week might be
quieter so I could try grabbing the git repo...
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 16:23 +, Richard Wordingham wrote:
> As I understand it, the lack of a usable Thai spell-checker for
> LibreOffice (unlike, say, a Khmer spell-checker) is due to the Thai
> break iterator.
In common with many, I know nothing about Thai ;-) but my friend Tim
does
On 02/13/2012 03:39 PM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
New commits:
commit 9a51a7ae7153fee17013867bd7bbaacedee1980a
Author: Fridrich Štrba
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:39:43 2012 +0100
Copy the gcc's stdlibs to solver even if not packaging them
Hi Fridrich,
Mid-term, once implicit --with-sytem-stdlibs h
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:23, Noel Power wrote:
> On 09/02/12 14:53, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
>>> 2) When trying to delete text in the edit box, the last character
>>> sticks (can't be deleted).
>
> well that would seem to be because your code thinks a blank prefix is
> illegal, I believe chang
Kohei Yoshida píše v Pá 10. 02. 2012 v 14:33 -0500:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 18:23 +0100, Stefan Knorr (Astron) wrote:
> > Hi Petr,
> >
> > > I checked other applications, e.g. pidgin, xchat, gimp, kmail,
> > > evolution, firefox. They all have [Cancel] button in the about dialog.
> > > It is in th
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 13:31 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Do we really need to keep "analysis" and "date" as separate shared
> libraries ?
Ho hum; well - they are not used at calc startup, but they are at
document load - as soon as you start to enter a formula they are loaded,
and if you
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> the sc, sd, sw libraries already take forever to link with full debug,
You link with full debug ? :-)
> and adding more stuff to them would also impact startup performance for
> the respective application.
Not necessarily
Hi Kohei,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> Sorry, I didn't explain the goal very well. :-P
Me not reading the code. :(
Sorry for the noise.
> You just need to move the options that are in the Formula options page,
> which is to say move those that are below bFormulaRegexE
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 17:56 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi Cedric, Kendy,
>
> On 13.02.2012 14:24, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > Could someone (kendy?) review and cherry-pick -s in -3-5 the following
> > commit:
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=beb8a85796c78d4cdcf6497b67
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 21:38 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> actually there was not a scrollbar appearing at the bottom, there was a
> border. :)
...
> so in normal mode we use IsVisible(false), that checks for
> SwScrollbar::bVisible, regardless of the real visibility. The next line:
>
Hi Dag,
Dag Wieers píše v Pá 10. 02. 2012 v 16:36 +0100:
> I found a bug in LibreOffice causing style:rel-width and style:rel-height
> not to accept "scale" as a possible value. In fact the behavior seems to
> be to default to 100% if anything except percentages are provided.
>
> https://
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||43399
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #184 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 06:11:27 PST ---
No databases in Wisard of mailmerge (regression since 3.4.4)
Bug 43399 - Address data source wizard will not allow the definition of a
Spreadsheet connection setting
-
Hi Albert,
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:28 +0100, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> I have worked with converting the Formula options. However, while
> doing the work and looking through the code I have started to question
> if this conversion is such a good idea in this case?
>
> Without knowing the exac
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 13:01 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> apparently a SwFlowFrm::pPrecede was introduced, turning the SwFlowFrm
> list from a singly linked list to a doubly linked list, without much
> thought given to the additional invariants that need to be maintained;
> these patch
Hi Miklos,
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:08 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> See
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=63dfa72b5eca7be9df3076314055c5c74aa1f4fa
>
> It makes the RTF import not ignore page breaks right before text frames.
>
> Could somebody sign-off and push to -3-5, pl
Hi Miklos,
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 09:46 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> See
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1f77a5e8d5bf8a7f1b7bd7206996d2b2efc59462
>
> It makes the RTF export generate valid table output in case the original
> ODT had table:is-sub-table elements.
>
> Could
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||43318
--
Configure bugmail
Hi Cedric, Kendy,
On 13.02.2012 14:24, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Could someone (kendy?) review and cherry-pick -s in -3-5 the following
commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=beb8a85796c78d4cdcf6497b6725fce8f7141d75
What about hiding the indicators in the web layout mode
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #183 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 05:56:10 PST ---
Bug 43318 - Draw printing: Bitmap edited object prints incorrectly from Draw
(regression since 3.3.4)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi
Hi everyone,
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 23:49 +, fridrich.st...@bluewin.ch wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> One of you broke the build of LibreOffice with your commit :-(
> Please commit and push a fix ASAP!
...
> The error is:
>
> build failed - error is:: log for /home/lo/master/sal/prj
> [ info ALL ] L
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 15:41 +0100, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> My guess is ABORT_ON_ASSERTION = TRUE was supposed to be in
> smoketestoo_native/makefile.mk
Yeah, that was where it was supposed to be, and that would tweak
solenv/./inc/installationtest.mk to toggle on SAL_DIAGNOSE_ABORT and
DBGSV_ERROR_OUT
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||43313
--
Configure bugmail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
--- Comment #182 from sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com 2012-02-13 05:36:34 PST ---
Bug 43313 - Writer table: border of merged cell is misplaced (regression since
3.3.4)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 18:12 +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Please approve for libreoffice-3-5, and for libreoffice-3-4 too, if it
> applies there.
Applied to 3-4 as well, and seems sane, pushed to 3-4 as well.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffic
Hi all,
GSoC 2012 edition has been announced a week ago at the same time than
FOSDEM. We now need to be ready to apply and host cool projects for cool
students and cool mentors.
For this I'll need your help!
What to do:
* Clean up the ideas list from Gsoc/Ideas wiki page [0]. (See how to
pick
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
