>
>
>> Yes. I've got a backlog of stuff to do a mile long. Don't expect
> anything on this item before Wednesday.
>
>>
>>
David, Is this backlog something that is public or something we can read.
I'm hoping to get a better idea of how things work (Lift, OSGi, application
architecture / design, in
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Chad Skinner wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:51 AM, David Pollak <
> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Chad Skinner wrote:
>>
>>> I may be greatly overcomplicating things... I have been trying to read
>>> som
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:51 AM, David Pollak <
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Chad Skinner wrote:
>
>> I may be greatly overcomplicating things... I have been trying to read
>> some of the source code for the LiftServlet.scala and the class comment i
>
> I'm working with a couple of the OSGi gurus on this issue. They're in town
> for EclipseCon this week and I'll be meeting with them on Thursday. Don't
> worry about doing anything... we'll get OSGi support into Lift.
>
David and everyone,
Thanks for all of your help on this and your effort
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Chad Skinner wrote:
> I may be greatly overcomplicating things... I have been trying to read some
> of the source code for the LiftServlet.scala and the class comment is:
>
I'm working with a couple of the OSGi gurus on this issue. They're in town
for EclipseCon
I may be greatly overcomplicating things... I have been trying to read some
of the source code for the LiftServlet.scala and the class comment is:
/**
* An implementation of HttpServlet. Just drop this puppy into
* your Java web container, do a little magic in web.xml, and
* ta-da, you've got
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Chad Skinner wrote:
>
> I might only have 8 years of experience with working with the
>> Servlet-stack, but the main reason that Lift is hooked into a Filter is that
>> Lift filters requests... ;)
>>
>
> But, if OSGi does not support filters then another solution w
> The only breakage that I can see is that Req.request is going to turn from
> an HttpServletRequest to Box[HttpServletRequest] The rest will be under the
> covers.
This is pretty damn exciting.
On Mar 20, 10:24 am, David Pollak
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Viktor Klang wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I might only have 8 years of experience with working with the
> Servlet-stack, but the main reason that Lift is hooked into a Filter is that
> Lift filters requests... ;)
>
> Hooking it in as a Servlet would only be feasible if we'd
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Chad Skinner wrote:
>
> I might only have 8 years of experience with working with the
>> Servlet-stack, but the main reason that Lift is hooked into a Filter is that
>> Lift filters requests... ;)
>>
>
> But, if OSGi does not support filters then another solution w
> I might only have 8 years of experience with working with the
> Servlet-stack, but the main reason that Lift is hooked into a Filter is that
> Lift filters requests... ;)
>
But, if OSGi does not support filters then another solution will need to be
identified. For example, what if all requests a
Guys,
I might only have 8 years of experience with working with the Servlet-stack,
but the main reason that Lift is hooked into a Filter is that Lift filters
requests... ;)
Hooking it in as a Servlet would only be feasible if we'd have a two-pass
system where:
The request first goes through the
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:44 PM, David Pollak wrote:
> Chad,
> What would be most helpful is if you could mock up and example with
> servlets (written in Scala or Java). If I have something that I can run and
> test, then I can figure out how to shim Lift into it.
>
>
David, I'll try to mock so
Chad,
What would be most helpful is if you could mock up and example with servlets
(written in Scala or Java). If I have something that I can run and test,
then I can figure out how to shim Lift into it.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Chad Skinner wrote:
>
>> The sugested worka
>
>
> The sugested workaround (FilterServletAdaptor) might also help to get the
> LiftFilter working.
>
I will take a look into this ... I have spent the last week reading in my
spare time and am still feeling a little lost ... honestly, I had not heard
of lift and very little of scala before then.
>
> AFAIK to the OSGi HttpService one can only register a
> servlet.LiftServlet class is A HttpServlet but I don;t think that this
> would help you much as critical operations are done in the LiftFilter
> class.
>
This is correct OSGi does not support the newest servlet spec and filters
are not su
+1 on making Lift work with OSGi
+1 on ripping the logic out of both the Servlet and ServletFilter
implementations and moving them elsewhere. This will be necessary to do
portlets anyway.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM, marius d. wrote:
>
> Hi Chad,
>
> On Mar 19, 9:45 pm, chad skinner wrote:
Not that there is much action (last update was in 2007) but it might be
worthwhile to look at:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=128068
Maybe votes help to get the enhancement request be resolved.
The sugested workaround (FilterServletAdaptor) might also help to get the
LiftFilter wor
Hi Chad,
On Mar 19, 9:45 pm, chad skinner wrote:
> I am trying to redesign our web applications into a more services /
> component based system that would allow us to add features without
> having to worry about breaking other components. I have been
> investigating OSGi as a framework utilizing
19 matches
Mail list logo
