Hi Yan,
Hi Andrew,
I confirmed movement in combination with Pacemaker1.0.12 in a repository of
your test.
* https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test
On my test, both SNMP and GUI worked without a problem.
Please release the contents of this repository as GUI for Pacemaker1.0
Hello Chris,
On 12/01/2011 06:25 PM, Chris Bowlby wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm in the process of configuring a 2 node + DRBD enabled DHCP cluster
> using the following packages:
>
> SLES 11 SP1, with Pacemaker 1.1.6, corosync 1.4.2, and drbd 8.3.12.
>
> I know about DHCP's internal fail-over
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Florian Haas schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 15:05 in
> >>> Nachricht
> :
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic
> > wrote:
> > >> Why? It seems "typeset" is the POSIX thing, while "local" is a BASH-ism.
> > >> So
>
On 11/30/2011 02:06 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2011-11-29T12:36:39, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
>> If you repeatedly try to re-sync with a dying disk, with each resync
>> interrupted by i/o error, you will get data corruption sooner or later.
>
> No, you shouldn't. (Unless the drive returns fa
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Does the latest version of the RAs have all the old
> heartbeat related material removed?
I don't follow. Care to clarify the question?
Florian
--
Need help with High Availability?
http://www.hastexo.com/now
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 13:25 -0400, Chris Bowlby wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm in the process of configuring a 2 node + DRBD enabled DHCP cluster
This doesn't really address your specific question, but I got dhcpd to
work by using the ocf:heartbeat:anything RA.
primitive dhcp ocf:heartbeat:anyth
Hi Everyone,
I'm in the process of configuring a 2 node + DRBD enabled DHCP cluster
using the following packages:
SLES 11 SP1, with Pacemaker 1.1.6, corosync 1.4.2, and drbd 8.3.12.
I know about DHCP's internal fail-over abilities, but after testing, it
simply failed to remain viable as a more
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 11:16 in
Nachricht <20111201101646.GA11310@walrus.homenet>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:37:57AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
[...]
> > So what are you doing here?
>
> I'm not sure :) You seem to be very proficient at programming,
> why don't
>>> Tim Serong schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 10:19 in Nachricht
<4ed74691.9000...@suse.com>:
> On 12/01/2011 09:10 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> "Gao,Yan" schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
> > <4ed716be.9090...@suse.com>:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Hi!
>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 08:37:57AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 30.11.2011 um 15:35 in
> Nachricht <2030143512.GB6964@walrus.homenet>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:56:34PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > It seems the execut
>>> Andreas Kurz schrieb am 30.11.2011 um 14:54 in
>>> Nachricht
<4ed6357a.5040...@hastexo.com>:
> On 11/30/2011 12:58 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > when changing the performce-related-only mount option for a filesystem I
> noticed that the LRM decided to restart the resource and all
On 12/01/2011 09:10 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
"Gao,Yan" schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
> <4ed716be.9090...@suse.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Simple question: when is the attribute "cib-last-written" in XML's "cib"
>> element updated?
>>
On 12/01/11 16:10, Ulrich Windl wrote:
"Gao,Yan" schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
> <4ed716be.9090...@suse.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Simple question: when is the attribute "cib-last-written" in XML's "cib"
>> element updated?
>> When
OK,
I read "9.5. Reloading Services After a Definition Change".So the filesystem RA
lacks a "reload" operation. However even when having a "reload" operation, not
all parameter changes can be done via a "reload"; some need a real restart.
Now the confusing thing comes into play: Why can't a "un
>>> "Gao,Yan" schrieb am 01.12.2011 um 06:55 in Nachricht
<4ed716be.9090...@suse.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/11 21:35, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Simple question: when is the attribute "cib-last-written" in XML's "cib"
> element updated?
> When "//cib/configuration" is changed.
So why is
15 matches
Mail list logo