Acked-by : Francisco Alecrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ext Seth Forshee wrote:
OMAP2430/3430 contain an 1.8V-only MMC2 host that is not properly
supported by the current driver. This patch contains changes to
correctly set up this host.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Franc
Acked-by : Francisco Alecrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ext Seth Forshee wrote:
OMAP2430/3430 contain an 1.8V-only MMC2 host that is not properly
supported by the current driver. This patch contains changes to
correctly set up this host.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Franc
OMAP2430/3430 contain an 1.8V-only MMC2 host that is not properly
supported by the current driver. This patch contains changes to
correctly set up this host.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Francisco Alecrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 32 +
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:45:21PM +0300, Francisco Alecrim wrote:
> Hello Seth,
>It's fine and work for 3430! Maybe you should resend changing the
> commit message. It's too big.
>
> Remove "RFC" from subject.
>
> What do you think?
>
> if(changes)
>Acked-by: Francisco Alecrim <[EMAIL
Acked-by: Francisco Alecrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PS: Carlos wrote "And thanks to Keppler for advise me.". Keppler ==
Francisco Alecrim. ;)
ext Carlos Aguiar wrote:
From: Jarkko Lavinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch adds device configuration to provide second HSMMC slot support
on OMAP 2430 a
Hello Seth,
It's fine and work for 3430! Maybe you should resend changing the
commit message. It's too big.
Remove "RFC" from subject.
What do you think?
if(changes)
Acked-by: Francisco Alecrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ext Seth Forshee wrote:
This patch contains some fixes for the 1.8V MM
From: Jarkko Lavinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch adds device configuration to provide second HSMMC slot support
on OMAP 2430 and 3430 boards.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Lavinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Change CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX by CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP243X macro when this config
is needed only for 2430 bo
Hi Tony,
Please, consider this new version of the patch instead of the previous
one [1].
If you take a good look, I was defining the OMAP_MMC2_INT macro with
INT_24XX_MMC_IRQ - the correct is INT_24XX_MMC2_IRQ.
Sorry, my bad. And thanks to Keppler for advise me.
BR,
Carlos.
[1] http://marc.in
* Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080331 13:43]:
> * Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080328 10:41]:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This helps with the annoying I2C timeouts. Does anybody have an idea
> > why the twl4030 chip does not like doing multiple transfers in a row?
> >
> > To me the only diffe
Hi,
No, I do not use it in conjunction with semi-hosting on Lauterbach.
Only for kernel logging.
I am not sure if OMAP3 SDTI can be used for serial port replacement.
In comparison with OMAP1 and OMAP2 there is no RX port in OMAP3 SDTI
anymore.
The only port left is TX for sending data from OMAP3
From: Jarkko Lavinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch adds device configuration to provide second HSMMC slot support
on OMAP 2430 and 3430 boards.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Lavinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Change CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP24XX by CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP243X macro when this config
is needed only for 2430 bo
On 31/03/2008, Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080329 18:48]:
> > > From: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > [Sorry, the previous patch was a copy/paste mistake
> > > Attached is a rev-4 with the cpu_relax() added to while loops as
> > > suggested by Ladislav, and CTRL register defines moved to the
right
> > > location.
> >
> > I confirm this version of the patch works on 3430 with latest
kernel.
>
> I'll push the rev-4 version of the patch today. The sec
* Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080311 09:30]:
> * Antti P Miettinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080309 17:31]:
> > Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > * Antti P Miettinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080229 08:57]:
> > >> If mirroring is OK from your point of view I'll continue polling Lars
> >
* Woodruff, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080321 02:01]:
> Hi
>
> > Attached is a rev-4 with the cpu_relax() added to while loops as
> > suggested by Ladislav, and CTRL register defines moved to the right
> > location.
>
> I confirm this version of the patch works on 3430 with latest kernel.
I'll
* Felipe Balbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080331 11:53]:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Francisco Alecrim wrote:
> > Update twl4030's includes. Headers now available under include/linux/i2c.
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c:41:34: error: asm/arch/twl4030-rtc.h:
> > No such file
* arun c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080331 09:53]:
> This patch removes a dead line from omapfb_main.c
Pushing today.
Tony
>
> Signed-off-by: arun c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/video/omap/omapfb_main.c |1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vid
* Tony Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080328 10:41]:
> Hi all,
>
> This helps with the annoying I2C timeouts. Does anybody have an idea
> why the twl4030 chip does not like doing multiple transfers in a row?
>
> To me the only difference seems to be that clocks are idled between
> writing the twl4
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:58:11AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080329 18:48]:
> > From: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > [Sorry, the previous patch was a copy/paste mistake, this one should be
> > better]
> >
> > I have no access to the do
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Francisco Alecrim wrote:
> Update twl4030's includes. Headers now available under include/linux/i2c.
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c:41:34: error: asm/arch/twl4030-rtc.h: No
> such file or directory
> drivers/video/omap/lcd_2430sdp.c:30:30: error:
* Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080329 18:48]:
> From: Andrzej Zaborowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [Sorry, the previous patch was a copy/paste mistake, this one should be
> better]
>
> I have no access to the docs for this chip but I'm pretty sure the current
> address of the two DIDR1 r
* Eduardo Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080330 21:49]:
> Hi Tony and Paul,
>
> Just a little question/warn, these kind of code may not be preempt safe:
>
> +/* Enables clock without considering parent dependencies or use count
> + * REVISIT: Maybe change this to use clk->enable like on omap1?
> +
22 matches
Mail list logo
