lists and the parameters.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/qla1280.c | 376
1 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 219 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
index 76089cf..1
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:57:17 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:41:17 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:42 +0200
> &
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:41:17 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:42 +0200
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:42 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wro
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 02:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:24:01 +0900
>
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
worried about this specific change. But
> there's only been one piece of fallout because if it until now - well
> two, with the sparc64 stuff.
>
> The problem is that you cannot zero the entire sg entry, because then
> you'd potentially overwrite the chain pointer.
>
> I&#
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:16:29 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:45:28 +0200
> >
> > > Righto, it's invalid to call sg_next() on the last entry!
> >
> > Unfortunately, that's
sg list elements might not be continuous.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c b/arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c
index 4338f41..3
sg list elements might not be continuous.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
lib/swiotlb.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
index c419ecf..752fd95 100644
--- a/lib/swiotlb.c
+++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
@@
This fixes the scsi_dma_map failure path, which could lead to data
corruption.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c | 17 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c b/drivers
Commit 2c941a204070ab32d92d40318a3196a7fb994c00 looks incomplete. The
helper functions like prepare_sg() need to support sg chaining too.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/sparc64/kernel/iommu.c|1 -
arch/sparc64/kernel/iommu_common.c
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:09:41 -0400
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the accumulated updates queued for 2.6.24. It contains the
> usual slew of driver updates, plus some gdth and advansys rewrites. We
> still have some outstanding bugs in gdth and fc4 for which I'm hoping to
>
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:06:01 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 11:42:43AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > Please don't do this patch for now. This is because of the
> > soon to come scsi_data_buffer patch that rearages most of the members above
> > and puts t
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:48:58 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:28:34AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >...
> > Tomo, this is the patch I added.
>
> Please excuse my comment in case this was already clear:
>
> You are aware that this bug is a regression in 2.6.2
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:28:34 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0600
> > "Patro, Sumant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > &
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:47:26 -0700
Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:00:44 -0700
> > Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> atl-01:/lib/modules/2.6.23-rc3-smp-tgt/kernel/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx #
>
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:32:55 -0600
"Patro, Sumant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:01 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > C
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:44:13 -0700
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:25:34AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > Just looking at the number of devices, it seems that allocating it
> > > dynamically would b
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:00:44 -0700
Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:34:52 -0700
> > Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:38:13 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 20:15 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Cc's added, the complete bug report is at
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/2/243
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:48:26PM -0400, Burton Windle wrote:
> > >
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:38:13 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 20:15 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Cc's added, the complete bug report is at
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/2/243
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:48:26PM -0400, Burton Windle wrote:
> > >
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:57:07 -0700
Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:34:52 -0700
> > Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:31:14 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > You are right. scsi_debug's pseudo-bus works.
> >
> > But probabaly, scsi_debug doesn't need to call
> > blk_queue_max_segment_size now.
>
&
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:34:52 -0700
Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:34:18 -0700
> > Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007, FUJ
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:38:27 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch is for Jens' block tree (sg chaining branch).
>
> I don't have the hardware but this looks like a bug.
>
> ---
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
This patch is for Jens' block tree (sg chaining branch).
I don't have the hardware but this looks like a bug.
---
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] x86-64: pci-gart iommu sg chaining zeroes a wrong sg's
dma_length
Needs to zero the end of the
CC'ed Jens, James, and linux-scsi again.
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:22:15 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 03:49 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 03:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrot
CC'ed Jens, James, and linux-scsi.
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:31:55 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > Yeah, we could nicely handle lld's restrictions (especially with
> > stacking devices). But iommu code needs only max_segment
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:05:58 -0700
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:58:01PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > iommu code merges sg segments without considering lld's sg segment
> > restrictions. iommu code can't access to the limi
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:42:06 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:11:45 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> This patch mov
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:38:32 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 23:34 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > Yeah, I thought about it and it's possible (but not so easy). parisc
> > has IOMMU merging helper code and two parisc IOMMUs use
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:02:21 +0200
Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:57:57PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > iommu code merges sg lists without considering lld's restrictions so
> > some llds need a workaround to split
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:11:45 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > This patch moves blk_queue_max_segment_size to scsi_alloc_queue from
> > llds. It enables scsi_add_host to tells iommu lld's
> > dma_max_segment_size. If a
ned-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c |5 +
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |1 +
include/scsi/scsi_host.h |6 ++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
index 96bc312..2287
scsi_add_host sets shost_gendev.parent->max_segment_size to enables
iommu code to merge sg lists properly about lld's max segment size
limit.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
iommu code merges sg lists without considering lld's restrictions so
some llds need a workaround to split sg lists again. This patchset
fixes iommu to handle lld's max segment size limit properly.
The problem is that iommu code can't access to the restrictions
because they are in request_queue. io
iommu code merges sg segments without considering lld's sg segment
restrictions. iommu code can't access to the limitations because they
are in request_queue. This patch adds max_segment_size to device
structure. seg_boundary_mask will be added too later.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomono
This enables pci-gart iommu to merge sg lists properly about lld's max
segment size limit.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-ga
This removes blk_queue_max_segment_size and uses dma_max_segment_size
in scsi_host_template.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c | 19 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_inic
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plan
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:01:53 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:55 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
> > James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 20
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plan
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:37:33 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > index adc9559..694015d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> >
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:42:35 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:28 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500
> > James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew asked that I
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The
> list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug
> fixes. The main functionality changes are Kay's sysfs updates and the
> s
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:34:18 -0700
Seokmann Ju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Sep 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >
> >> This adds target mode support to qla2xxx.
> >>
> >> With set ql2enable_target_mode module par
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:19:13 +0200
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SG chaining bits:
> > - This is the bulk of the patchset. It consists of three major
> > components:
> >
> > - sglist-core, which add helpers for iterati
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:18:40 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:28:19 +0200
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 15 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:28:19 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
> > Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > &g
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:03:50 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:41:06AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:31:34 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 15,
ext+0x210): undefined reference to `isa_unregister_driver'
advansys.c:(.exit.text+0x21a): undefined reference to `isa_unregister_driver'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/fujita/git/linux-2.6'
make: *** [debian/stamp-build-kernel] Error 2
Is this alread
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:07:10 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > The majority of llds don't set supported_mode in scsi_host_template so
> > we get:
> >
> > luce:/sys/class/scsi_host/host0$ cat supported_mode
> > un
The majority of llds don't set supported_mode in scsi_host_template so
we get:
luce:/sys/class/scsi_host/host0$ cat supported_mode
unknown
It's harmless but it would be better to get:
luce:/sys/class/scsi_host/host0$ cat supported_mode
Initiator
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomono
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:43:43 -0700
Dave Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using the latest linus git tree. This is in fileio mode with
> IOMode=wb. It seems that if I do I/O and then immediately disconnect
> then the cache sync commands fail. Is this expected behavior or should
> the connecti
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:30:10 +0200
Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:16:03 +0200
> > Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Or would be "for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel,
&g
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:16:35 -0700
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > Can you try this patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)?
> >
> > >From 592bd2049cb3e6e1f1dde7cf631879f26ddffeaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori &
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:16:03 +0200
Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:14:21 +0200 (CEST)
> > Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> And one more update:
> >> There is SAS
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:14:21 +0200 (CEST)
Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> And one more update:
> There is SAS too, and I forgot 'is' in "on a disk which __ accessed via".
>
> drivers/scsi/Kconfig | 67
16/22 Eliminate prototypes. Boring and large.
> 19/22 Fix simultaneous calls to ->queuecommand
This is on the top of the patchset. Can I get your ACK on it?
This depends on scsi-misc, the patchset, and sg chaining stuff.
--
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATC
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:20:38 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:59:49 +0200 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 9/10/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:49:26 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
t; end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 28411047
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00
> > end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 31135687
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00
> > end_request: I/O error,
rror, dev sda, sector 31080855
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00
> > end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 31080919
> > Buffer I/O error on device sda1, logical block 3885107
> > sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=0x07 driverbyte=0x00
&g
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:09:15 +0300
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09 2007 at 16:47 +0300, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:25:57 +0300
> > Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &g
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 23:38:55 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:28:41 +0300
> Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 09 2007 at 16:47 +0300, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
&
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:28:41 +0300
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09 2007 at 16:47 +0300, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:12:03 +0300
> > Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> &g
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:12:03 +0300
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07 2007 at 0:50 +0300, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvstgt
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:25:57 +0300
Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07 2007 at 0:50 +0300, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patchset, which I submitted before, adds a new data structure,
> > scsi_data_buffer, including e
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:12:06 -0400
Douglas Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > - remove the unnecessary map_single path.
> >
> > - convert to use the new accessors for the sg
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:50:08 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patchset, which I submitted before, adds a new data structure,
> scsi_data_buffer, including everything for data transfer:
This patch is against Jens' sglist branch with the following patches:
From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 29 +++--
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index 8a525ab..af39a39
From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- remove the unnecessary map_single path.
- convert to use the new accessors for the sg lists and the
parameters.
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 36 ++--
1 files changed, 10
This just blindly converts ide-scsi to use the new accessors for the
sg lists and the parameters.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c | 23 ---
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/sc
From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c |6 +++---
drivers/scsi/sr.c | 25 +
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 2c6116f..aba
- remove the unnecessary map_single path.
- convert to use the new accessors for the sg lists and the parameters.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/qla1280.c | 369
1 files changed, 154 insertions(+
From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is a minimal patch needed if we want to use the new
scsi_data_buffer implementation, by useing of the new data
accessors. But it is not a complete clean up of the !use_sg path.
Libata-core still has the qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_SG and !qc->n_elem
code path
This patchset, which I submitted before, adds a new data structure,
scsi_data_buffer, including everything for data transfer:
struct scsi_data_buffer {
unsigned length;
int resid;
short sg_count;
short __sg_count;
struct scatterlist *sglist;
};
One scsi_dat
This adds a new data structure, scsi_data_buffer, including scsi data
transfer. One scsi_data_buffer structure is embedded in struct
scsi_cmnd for uni-directional transfer.
This is a preparation for bidirectional support.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
driver
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvstgt.c |2 +-
drivers/scsi/libsrp.c| 27 ++-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvstgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ib
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_if.c |2 +-
drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c | 27 ++-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_if.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_if.c
index c
to change more about the sg chaining's scsi_lib.c?
--
>From b887de7c48a674ace622544addd70ebc8ae31fd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:41:33 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] remove sglist_len
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMA
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 08:05:34 -0700
Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > This adds target mode support to qla2xxx.
> >
> > With set ql2enable_target_mode module parameter to 1, the driver runs
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:00:43 -0400
Douglas Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 04:56:01 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
&
Jeff, can I get your ACK on this patch?
Whatever in a request queue we set, iommu code ignores all the sg list
limitations.
---
>From 703d5158361bb6a4ecdc5cd9a6961a8cfb419f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 06:49:11 +0100
Subject:
00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 19:00:47 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] revert sg segment size ifdefs
This reverts sg segment size ifdefs that the current code has in order
to provide a way to reduce sgpool memory consumption.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA To
0 00 64 69 66 66 20 2d 75 72 Y...diff -ur
20 2d 2d 65 78 63 6c 75 64 65 20 2e 73 76 6e 20 --exclude .svn
INQUIRY duration=3 millisecs, resid=60
Note that resid is 60. So, in your case, only the first 36 bytes are
valid. But I guess that it's not good to leak random kernel data to
user-sp
srp transport works for target drivers without supported_mode
attribute but it would be better to use it explicitly.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvstgt.c |1 +
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 10 ++
2 files chan
This adds minimum target driver support like the srp transport does:
- fc_remote_port_{rolechg,delete} calls
scsi_tgt_it_nexus_{create,destroy} for target drivers.
- add callbacks to notify target drivers of the nexus and tmf
operation results to fc_function_template.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA
scsi_host. We would add a hook to a
scsi_host_template to change the active_mode attribute
dynamically. But now there is no hook since no lld supports that
feature.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/hosts.c
This patchset adds target mode support to fc transport class and
qla2xxx driver. The pathset is against scsi-misc.
The target mode support for fc transport class works in the same way
as srp transport class. fc_remote_port_{rolechg,delete} calls
scsi_tgt_it_nexus_{create,destroy} for target driver
should use host->can_queue instead of host->hostt->can_queue.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driver
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:05:22 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:10:31 +0200
> > Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Aug 18 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:10:31 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:47:59 +0900
> > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This is for Jens' sglist branch in
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:47:59 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is for Jens' sglist branch in the block git tree.
>
> It enables sg chaining support for the LLDs that use scsi_for_each_sg
> accessor properly.
>
> ---
> >From a6e50a3b476bc
=2
I guess that it would be better to leave sglist libata conversion in
the maintainers' hands.
---
>From 86d7a796417bde84fc3cbe6ac6ebaaa524266092 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:27:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] libata sg c
This is for Jens' sglist branch in the block git tree.
It enables sg chaining support for the LLDs that use scsi_for_each_sg
accessor properly.
---
>From a6e50a3b476bc193de103e8c1d95877ced38918e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug
This is for the sglist branch in Jens' block git tree.
---
>From 445923d1a8ff272293af3aadb6e58f82e6439e98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:25:32 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] ppc sg chaining support fixes
Signed-off-by: FUJITA To
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:01:20 -0400
"Harrosh, Boaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote ...
> > Subject: [PATCH] microtek: convert to use the data buffer accessors
> >
> > - remove the unnecessary map_single path.
> >
> > - convert
The patch is only compile tested.
---
>From d5ad824bce0e5e3894a102fee74f1f7c36d639b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:33:23 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] microtek: convert to use the data buffer accessors
- remove the unnecessary m
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:20:43 -0500
Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
> > For drivers like sg and st, do mean the the sg list that is passed to
> > functions like scsi_execute_async? If we kill that argument, and instead
> > have sg.c and other scsi_execute_async cal
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:58:14 -0500
Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:13:41 -0500
> > Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >>> Allocating 64K
201 - 300 of 569 matches
Mail list logo
