Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-14 Thread Ken Moffat
I have removed 0.9.9, and upgraded to 1.0. On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:10:15 +0200 Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I doubt redhat 7.3 has mozilla 1.0. It was just released. That is when > the problem started. It was different in 0,99. > > the new_window thing just makes each link op

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-13 Thread Michael Hipp
Someone has now posted a patch in Bugzilla that fixes the problem and invotes the "-remote openurl()" behavior if mozilla is running or starts mozilla if it isn't. So you can now invoke it with just 'mozilla foo' as would be expected. Why this wasn't in the original is mindboggling. Anyway,

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-13 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
I doubt redhat 7.3 has mozilla 1.0. It was just released. That is when the problem started. It was different in 0,99. the new_window thing just makes each link open a new window - but it is the same mozilla. Without this option, each link replaces the current one. This is a matter of preference.

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-13 Thread Ken Moffat
This is odd. I'm in redhat 7.3 and mozilla opens a new window from sylpheed using the command mozilla %s. If I use mozilla -remote "openurl(%s,new-window)" it works as well. If I remove the new-window, leaving mozilla -remote "openurl(%s)" it uses the existing instance of mozilla. I currently hav

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 21:45:17 -0500 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't want to run a second instance as the same user. I just want to be > able to click on a link, say in Kmail, and have the silly thing come up. > Works in every other browser known to mankind. > > Yes. You can ru

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Hipp
I don't want to run a second instance as the same user. I just want to be able to click on a link, say in Kmail, and have the silly thing come up. Works in every other browser known to mankind. Yes. You can run it twice from within. But from without it refuses. Tabbed browsing only works from

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Also sprach Kurt Wall: > > Why would you want to run a second instance as the same user? Why not > just enabled tabbed browsing and configure other apps to use > "mozilla -remoteURL(foo)"? Mozilla's enough of a porker as it is > without running two instances. Err, I meant "mozilla -remote 'openU

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Also sprach Michael Hipp: > > Probably not everyone will agree, but I deem this to be a showstopper > BugFeature (tm) in Mozilla 1.0. > > Seems they have intentionally made it so that multiple instances of > the browser cannot be run. So simply clicking on a link in Kmail to > bring up a second

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Joel Hammer
I forget where I got this info from, but netscape has an option which allows you to open a link in a running instance of netscape. Netscape starts with a script, so the following script I put together (full of bugs but it works): #!/bin/bash a=`ps xuw | grep mozilla | grep -v grep` # [ "$a" ] || a

Re: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Mike Chambers
- Original Message - From: "Michael Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linux Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:18 PM Subject: Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature > Is there any other worthwhile choice o

Mozilla 1.0 BugFeature

2002-06-12 Thread Michael Hipp
Probably not everyone will agree, but I deem this to be a showstopper BugFeature (tm) in Mozilla 1.0. Seems they have intentionally made it so that multiple instances of the browser cannot be run. So simply clicking on a link in Kmail to bring up a second window won't work. Or even just runnin