[IFWP] Fwd: The final official press release on new ICANN/NSI/DOC deal

>Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 11:47:17 -0400 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: The final official press release on new ICANN/NSI/DOC deal >Cc: >Bcc: >X-Attachments: > > > >ICANN, U.S. Department of Commerce, and Netwo

[IFWP] from IP ICANN and IBM

>Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1904 05:51:29 -0500 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: ICANN and IBM >Cc: >Bcc: >X-Attachments: > >[please note this is from John Patrick from IBM not me (some IPers >assume everything they read comes f

[IFWP] As sent to my IP list Would the U.S. Government regulate theInternet? And how will this come about? by Richard J. Solomon

[Richard J. Solomon is the Chief Scientist of the UPenn Center for Communications Technology and Policy and the co-author with Lee McKnight and Russell Neuman of The Gordian Knot: Gridlock on the Information Highway (MIT Press, 1997) Would the U.S. Government regulate the Internet? And how wi

[IFWP] As sent to my IP list -- IP: Parallel Processing Democracy

[ David Johnson is a partner in the Washington, D.C. firm of Wilmer, Cutler and Pickering. He represents NSI but has been involved in the ICANN debate for some time in various capacities and offers this only as his personal opinion. djf] From: "Johnson, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[IFWP] Business Group Sets Internet Proposals

> >Business Group Sets Internet Proposals > >By Neal Boudette, European Telecommunications Correspondent > > >PARIS (Reuters) - An industry group backed by some of the world's heaviest >hitting executives will unveil a set of proposals on regulating the Internet >Monday, all in the hope of making

[IFWP] Re: please give us substance and not assertions Re: November Cook Report - intro and part 1 ISOC's critical role in enabling ICANN

Gordon, I will try to outline such a set of concrete scenarios. It will take some time. I have no staff, it is the beginning of our term and I will take what time is necessary to do a good job. So don't expect it this week but I will do it soon. Dave At 3:27 PM -0400 9/10/99, Gordon Cook w

Re: [IFWP] please give us substance and not assertions Re:November Cook Report - intro and part 1 ISOC's critical role in enabling ICANN

Many thanks, yes yes yes At 2:20 PM -0700 9/10/99, Greg Skinner wrote: >It strikes me that Farber is not so much defending ICANN (as it currently >exists) as he is defending *the process* by which there can be Internet >self-governance. If ICANN (as it currently exists) falls, the process may >f

[IFWP] Re: November Cook Report - intro and part 1 ISOC's critical role in enabling ICANN

y shoot up everything. (most of the time the money they may cause to get contributed is secondary to this careful spade work) dave At 12:01 PM -0700 9/10/99, Frank Rizzo wrote: >At 2:50 PM -0400 9/10/99, David Farber wrote: >>I have a lot of unhappiness as to how ICANN is evolving

[IFWP] Re: November Cook Report - intro and part 1 ISOC's critical rolein enabling ICANN

Gordon, My only comment is I wish the "unindicted conspirators" were as devious and organized as you claim. My experience is that they were not and still are not. I just don't believe that the ICANN Board (nor did the ITAG or the ISOC Board) meets in private to plot the takeover of the intern

[IFWP] Fwd: IP: ICANN and what it is

> >Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 10:09:02 -0400 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: IP: ICANN and what it is >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>To: David Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>From: [EMA