On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 06:01:54PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Simon Wistow said:
>
> > Where would we be if we'd not bothered writing some Matt's Scripts
> > replacments on the assumption that nobody would pick them up. Or
> > written an extensible MLM in Perl on the assumption that despite hav
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:58:41PM +0100, Lusercop wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > > * Must be a poster to the list
> > > * Or a regular on IRC
> > > * Or a regular at the pub and/or technical meets.
> > OK,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:58:41PM +0100, Lusercop wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > * Must be a poster to the list
> > * Or a regular on IRC
> > * Or a regular at the pub and/or technical meets.
> OK, how do you judge any of these?
Matthew, let me introduc
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:53:54PM +0100, Dean Wilson wrote:
> I haven't been to an official meeting in the best part of twelve months and
> i had to miss YAPC. Does that make me a "freebie-seeking hanger on"? If it
> does and the criteria for getting something on the site is going to the pub
> th
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Simon Batistoni wrote:
> On 11/10/02 10:16 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > Which made me thing - is there a section on "books we wrote" on the
> > london.pm site to give blatant free advertising plugs? [No]
> >
> > Would it be a good idea? Not sure. Beca
From: "Simon Batistoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think personal bios still have a problem, in that there has to be
> some criteria for "bio-worthiness", which doesn't wind up looking
> elitist. I have a sinking feeling that the two things are
> incompatible, and that nice idea as it is, it really
Simon Wistow said:
> Where would we be if we'd not bothered writing some Matt's Scripts
> replacments on the assumption that nobody would pick them up. Or
> written an extensible MLM in Perl on the assumption that despite having
> whinged about it for ages nobody would actually care.
Oooh, di
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:16:56PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Of course sometimes I think exactly the opposite but if yer optomistic
> then you get a lot more done.
Hear hear. Just post to webmaster and then have them check it in.
Webmaster might like to provide a template (in the general sense
On Friday, October 11, 2002 4:17 PM, Simon Wistow [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:02:21PM +0100, Ivor Williams said:
> > Maybe introduce some kind of XP style voting system, like on Perlmonks or
> > Everything2.
>
> Alternatively we could just do it and then, if any
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Lusercop wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > * Must be a poster to the list
> > * Or a regular on IRC
> > * Or a regular at the pub and/or technical meets.
>
> OK, how do you judge any of these?
Why, subjectively of course !
Seriously
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:02:21PM +0100, Ivor Williams said:
> Maybe introduce some kind of XP style voting system, like on Perlmonks or
> Everything2.
Alternatively we could just do it and then, if anybody complains, deal
with it then rather than our current modus operandi of burning our
bridg
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +0100, Simon Wilcox said:
> My criteria for getting on it would probably be similar to the rules for
> voting in last years leadership contest, that is:
>
> * Must be a poster to the list
> * Or a regular on IRC
> * Or a regular at the pub and/or technical meet
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:58:41PM +0100, Lusercop wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
>> * Must be a poster to the list
>> * Or a regular on IRC
>> * Or a regular at the pub and/or technical meets.
>OK, how do you judge any of these? How often does one have to po
On Friday, October 11, 2002 3:49 PM, Simon Wilcox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Simon Batistoni wrote:
>
> > I think personal bios still have a problem, in that there has to be
> > some criteria for "bio-worthiness", which doesn't wind up looking
> > elitist. I have a s
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:49:27PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> * Must be a poster to the list
> * Or a regular on IRC
> * Or a regular at the pub and/or technical meets.
OK, how do you judge any of these? How often does one have to post in order
to be "a poster on the list". How much time spent
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Simon Batistoni wrote:
> I think personal bios still have a problem, in that there has to be
> some criteria for "bio-worthiness", which doesn't wind up looking
> elitist. I have a sinking feeling that the two things are
> incompatible, and that nice idea as it is, it really
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:09:37PM +0100, Simon Batistoni wrote:
> On 11/10/02 12:53 +0100, Dean Wilson wrote:
> > I haven't been to an official meeting in the best part of twelve months and
> > i had to miss YAPC. Does that make me a "freebie-seeking hanger on"? If it
> > does and the criteria for
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Simon Batistoni wrote:
> I think personal bios still have a problem, in that there has to be
> some criteria for "bio-worthiness", which doesn't wind up looking
> elitist. I have a sinking feeling that the two things are
> incompatible, and that nice idea as it is, it really w
On 11/10/02 12:53 +0100, Dean Wilson wrote:
> I haven't been to an official meeting in the best part of twelve months and
> i had to miss YAPC. Does that make me a "freebie-seeking hanger on"? If it
> does and the criteria for getting something on the site is going to the pub
> then fine but if it
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Batistoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It could be a long, dark, slippery slope, but I think that it's
> possible to distinguish between "involved" perl mongers such as Dave,
> and "freebie-seeking hangers on", who don't even come to a meeting.
> There *is* a pr
On 11/10/02 10:16 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Which made me thing - is there a section on "books we wrote" on the
> london.pm site to give blatant free advertising plugs? [No]
>
> Would it be a good idea? Not sure. Because then we'd have everyone
> (even Matt Wright?) subscribing to london.pm j
21 matches
Mail list logo
