Re: [Lxc-users] Fwd: LXC WebPanel

2013-04-10 Thread toens . bueker
brian mullan bmullan.m...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Command line is easy with LXC but I can envision the LXC WebPanel evolving into a terrifically capable LXC Management tool for large or more complex use of LXC if the work to do so occurs.    KVM can be used from the command line too but

Re: [Lxc-users] Cluster filesystem?

2012-10-08 Thread Toens Bueker
Ulli Horlacher frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: should - I prefer recommendations ny experience :-) I have tried by myself gluster and it is HORRIBLE slow. If you are interested, try Moosefs. I have quite good experiences with it, however not under containers. Moosefs is

Re: [Lxc-users] Server capacity planing and real world usage.

2012-09-24 Thread Toens Bueker
Leon Waldman le.wald...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, first post on the list :) Welcome. Assuming a hardened Guest image (SELinux or Apparmor + The NSA Guidelines + no shell access on the guests), A LXC Host would be suitable to use as containment and resources control system for web hosting

Re: [Lxc-users] LXC container templates

2012-09-05 Thread Toens Bueker
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: I am looking for something that fills in like: lxc-create -t ubuntu-lamp -n LAMPServer How about using a vanilla (jeos-like) template, but then running a small shell script for the role in question? I don't know, whether it fits here but maybe it would

Re: [Lxc-users] LXC vs ESX

2011-05-23 Thread Toens Bueker
Ulli Horlacher frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: A small network application benchmark between LXC and VMware ESX: ESX: framstag@diaspora:~: fexsend -i unifex /tmp/2GB.tmp . Server/User: http://fex.uni-stuttgart.de/frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de /tmp/2GB.tmp : 2048 MB in 87 s (24105

Re: [Lxc-users] native (non-NAT) routing?

2011-04-12 Thread Toens Bueker
Ulli Horlacher frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de wrote: host zoo 129.69.1.39 container LXC 129.69.1.219 router129.69.1.254 In LXC.conf is: lxc.utsname = LXC lxc.network.type = veth lxc.network.link = br0 lxc.network.flags = up lxc.network.name = eth0

Re: [Lxc-users] /dev/pts vs. ptmx - symlink?

2010-10-18 Thread Toens Bueker
Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote: [...] Any hint is appreciated. What is the lxc configuration file ? I think that was originally generated by lxc-debian (and then adjusted by me): lxc.utsname = testlxc lxc.tty = 4 lxc.pts = 1024 lxc.network.type = veth lxc.network.flags = up