Am 01.02.2016 um 20:49 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I propose that we resolve the situation in master as soon as possible by
reverting the commit that is under discussion.
Wasn't it our goal in the past to keep the fileformat stable with the
first beta release?
I don't understand the problem. A
Am 01.02.2016 um 21:10 schrieb Georg Baum:
OK, as my spare time for LyX ends, I won't touch siggraph but do this
for AGUTeX. OK?
IMO not OK. The siggraph changes in c1e0b24304e do still lack a +1. This
has to be fixed first. If you do not want to do it, then this will be
done by somebody else,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 01/02/16 20:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> So in summary, I think we should revert, release beta, have beta being
>> tested while we figure out updating the layouts, and then go forward
>> from there.
>
> Go for it. We cannot allow each and every bug that is not
On 01/02/16 15:54, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 01.02.2016 um 15:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
Le 30/01/2016 09:55, pdv a écrit :
Hi,
Build under OS X fails with:
CXX userinfo.o
CXX unicode.o
OBJC AppleSpeller.o
error: invalid argument '-std=c++11' not allowed with 'C/Ob
Le 01/02/16 20:49, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
So in summary, I think we should revert, release beta, have beta being
tested while we figure out updating the layouts, and then go forward
from there.
Go for it. We cannot allow each and every bug that is not a real
regression to block beta (this i
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016 um 13:25:07, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Kornel Benko wrote:
>>
>> Why? The layout in LyX 2.1 works for acmsiggraph.cls version 0.80, the
>> new one for acmsiggraph.cls version 0.92. Therefore, with such a
>> renaming, we would ensure that _all_ exis
Am 31.01.2016 um 21:43 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Am 31.01.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Georg Baum:
Sorry, this is a completely different topic. If you want such a
procedure,
make a suggestion how it should look like, who is going to implement
it and
how it is supposed to be maintained. Currently we do not h
Dear all,
We are close to releasing beta but a little stuck. We currently have an
important discussion going on involving what to do when a new version of
a LaTeX class for one of our templates is released. I hope that we will
arrive at a situation that everyone accepts so we can put this in the
D
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:29:29PM -0600, Bryan Brown wrote:
> Colleagues:
>
> I have been using Lyx on the Mac for more than a year. I am currently using
> 2.1.4. I have recently moved to HiDPI(Retina) with El Capitan. I would like
> to give Lys 2.2 a try if possible.
>
> Regards
> Bill Bro
Colleagues:
I have been using Lyx on the Mac for more than a year. I am currently using
2.1.4. I have recently moved to HiDPI(Retina) with El Capitan. I would like
to give Lys 2.2 a try if possible.
Regards
Bill Brown
Am 01.02.2016 um 15:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 30/01/2016 09:55, pdv a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Build under OS X fails with:
>>
>> CXX userinfo.o
>> CXX unicode.o
>> OBJC AppleSpeller.o
>> error: invalid argument '-std=c++11' not allowed with 'C/ObjC'
>
> What vers
Le 30/01/2016 09:55, pdv a écrit :
Hi,
Build under OS X fails with:
CXX userinfo.o
CXX unicode.o
OBJC AppleSpeller.o
error: invalid argument '-std=c++11' not allowed with 'C/ObjC'
What version of Mac OS X is that? I had to add -std=c++11 to CPPFLAGS
because the clang p
12 matches
Mail list logo