Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them are:
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them are:
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here my second one, we talk here about hundreds of warning per file. An
excerpt here:
d:/program/Qt/4.1.1//include/QtGui/../../src/gui/widgets/qcombobox.h:262:
warning: inline
function 'const QComboBoxPrivate*
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Well, with Qt4, this happens only for moc/*_moc.C. I had a look at
qtglobal.h and I saw this:
Small correction, this happens also for files in frontends/qt4/. I
forgot that I modified the Makefile, sorry.
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes
Enrico wrote:
I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons: 1) the configure step won't
work with the --with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4'
option. It complain about 'd'
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:01:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes
Enrico wrote:
I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons: 1) the configure step won't
work with the
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':' on MSYS, but I am
Enrico not sure as I don't have it installed.
So PATH is a ':' separated list on msys? How does it
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
That's -Wl,--export-all-symbols and simply passes --export-all-symbols
to the linker. It does no good and simply will increase your linking
time. I suggest that you get rid of it.
[..]
I was not talking about the warnings, sorry for the confusion.
What I said only
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':' on MSYS, but I am
Enrico not sure as I don't have it installed.
So PATH is a ':'
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':' on MSYS, but I am
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':' on MSYS, but I am
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico on Cygwin, and I suspect that
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:45:00PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
That's -Wl,--export-all-symbols and simply passes --export-all-symbols
to the linker. It does no good and simply will increase your linking
time. I suggest that you get rid of it.
[..]
I was not
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:45:00PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
That's -Wl,--export-all-symbols and simply passes --export-all-symbols
to the linker. It does no good and simply will increase your linking
time. I suggest that you get
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
here my second one, we talk here about hundreds of warning per file. An
excerpt here:
d:/program/Qt/4.1.1//include/QtGui/../../src/gui/widgets/qcombobox.h:262:
warning: inline
function 'const QComboBoxPrivate*
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Well, with Qt4, this happens only for "moc/*_moc.C". I had a look at
qtglobal.h and I saw this:
Small correction, this happens also for files in frontends/qt4/. I
forgot that I modified the Makefile, sorry.
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes
Enrico> wrote:
>> I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons: 1) the configure step won't
>> work with the --with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4'
>> option. It
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:31:58AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
> >>an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:01:09PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes
> Enrico> wrote:
> >> I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons: 1) the configure step won't
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico> on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':' on MSYS, but I am
Enrico> not sure as I don't have it installed.
So PATH is a ':' separated list on msys? How
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
That's -Wl,--export-all-symbols and simply passes --export-all-symbols
to the linker. It does no good and simply will increase your linking
time. I suggest that you get rid of it.
[..]
I was not talking about the warnings, sorry for the confusion.
What I said only
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico> on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':' on MSYS, but I am
Enrico> not sure as I don't have it installed.
So PATH is a ':'
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>>> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico> on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >>"Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >Enrico> PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
> >Enrico> on Cygwin, and I suspect that it also is ':'
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> PATH_SEPARATOR is correctly set to ':' when running configure
Enrico> on Cygwin, and I
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:45:00PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >>>That's -Wl,--export-all-symbols and simply passes --export-all-symbols
> >>>to the linker. It does no good and simply will increase your linking
> >>>time. I suggest that you get rid of it.
> [..]
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:45:00PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
That's -Wl,--export-all-symbols and simply passes --export-all-symbols
to the linker. It does no good and simply will increase your linking
time. I suggest that you get
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Before running configure yes, I have to, configure will
Abdelrazak fail if CXXFLAGS is not set.
Could you show us what your build process looks like?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Angus
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Angus Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
And use --enable-optimization=-Os
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Angus Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
And use --enable-optimization=-Os
Thanks to you
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact that --with-extra-prefix does not work: do you
have the right test.exe in your path?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact that --with-extra-prefix does not work: do you
have the right test.exe in your path?
I don't know but I guess not because test exist but gives me
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact that --with-extra-prefix does not work: do you
have the right test.exe in your
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact that
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons:
1) the configure step won't work with the
--with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4' option. It complain about
'd' not being a directory, it doesn't work either with a
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Apparently not, at least not in my system. I have the same errors as if
don't set CXXFLAGS:
checking for
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Abdelrazak Apparently not, at least not in my
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Abdelrazak
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons:
1) the configure step won't work with the
--with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4' option. It complain about
'd' not being a directory, it doesn't work
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
export CXXFLAGS=-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them are:
d:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.4/../../../../include/c++/3.4.4/bits/stl_uninitialized
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:11:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons:
1) the configure step won't work with the
--with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4'
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-),
here my second one, we talk here about hundreds of warning per file. An
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them are:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here my second one, we talk here about hundreds of warning per file. An
excerpt here:
d:/program/Qt/4.1.1//include/QtGui/../../src/gui/widgets/qcombobox.h:262:
warning: inline
function 'const QComboBoxPrivate* QComboBox::d_func() const' is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Before running "configure" yes, I have to, configure will
Abdelrazak> fail if CXXFLAGS is not set.
Could you show us what your build process looks like?
Jean-Marc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Angus
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
Angus> Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
And use --enable-optimization=-Os
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
Angus> Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
And use --enable-optimization=-Os
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact that --with-extra-prefix does not work: do you
have the right test.exe in your path?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact that --with-extra-prefix does not work: do you
have the right test.exe in your path?
I don't know but I guess not because "test" exist but
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Thanks to you both ;-)
>> Concerning the fact that --with-extra-prefix does not work: do you
>> have the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Thanks to you both ;-)
Concerning the fact
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons:
> 1) the configure step won't work with the
> --with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4' option. It complain about
> 'd' not being a directory, it doesn't work either with a
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Apparently not, at least not in my system. I have the same errors as if
don't set CXXFLAGS:
checking for
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Angus Leeming a écrit :
>> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> > export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
>> Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Abdelrazak> Apparently not,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you should be all set.
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons:
1) the configure step won't work with the
--with-extra-prefix='d:/program/Aspell-0.60.4' option. It complain about
'd' not being a directory, it doesn't work
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
export CXXFLAGS="-Os -Id:/program/Aspell-0.60.4/include"
Replace with CPPFLAGS and you
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them are:
d:/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.4/../../../../include/c++/3.4.4/bits/stl_uninitialized
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 07:11:43PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 09:28:23AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >>I need to set CXXFLAGS for two reasons:
> >>1) the configure step won't work with the
>
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
me on that, here is my first report :-),
here my second one, we talk here about hundreds of warning per file. An
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Now that -Wl is passed to g++ (shouldn't it be -Wall by the way?) I have
> an awful lot of warnings. As I don't want Marchall Lastgouttes to catch
> me on that, here is my first report :-), Most of them are:
>
>
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> here my second one, we talk here about hundreds of warning per file. An
> excerpt here:
> d:/program/Qt/4.1.1//include/QtGui/../../src/gui/widgets/qcombobox.h:262:
> warning: inline
> function 'const QComboBoxPrivate* QComboBox::d_func() const' is
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Well sheriff there's a lot of #warning FIXME in there.
Abdelrazak They are for sure noticed but have been happily ignored
Abdelrazak for a long long time ;-)
We have voted an amnesty law for that :)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Well sheriff there's a lot of #warning FIXME in there.
Abdelrazak They are for sure noticed but have been happily ignored
Abdelrazak for a long long time ;-)
We have voted an
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
Abdelrazak missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
Abdelrazak is not done by default when you configure, might be a good
Abdelrazak idea to do so.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
Abdelrazak missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
Abdelrazak is not done by default when you configure, might be a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Abdelrazak :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
| Abdelrazak missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
| Abdelrazak is not done by default when
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Abdelrazak :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
| Abdelrazak missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
|
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars writes:
Lars |
Lars | Abdelrazak :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give
Lars warning about | Abdelrazak missing cases in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars writes:
Lars |
Lars | Abdelrazak :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give
Lars warning
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars writes: | Lars |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Lars Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
| Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: |
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Before running configure yes, I have to, configure will
Abdelrazak fail if CXXFLAGS is not set.
Could you show us what your build process looks like?
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Well sheriff there's a lot of #warning FIXME in there.
Abdelrazak> They are for sure noticed but have been happily ignored
Abdelrazak> for a long long time ;-)
We have voted an amnesty law for that :)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Well sheriff there's a lot of #warning FIXME in there.
Abdelrazak> They are for sure noticed but have been happily ignored
Abdelrazak> for a long long time ;-)
We have voted
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
Abdelrazak> missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
Abdelrazak> is not done by default when you configure, might be a good
Abdelrazak> idea
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
Abdelrazak> missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
Abdelrazak> is not done by default when you configure,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Abdelrazak> :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
| Abdelrazak> missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall option.This
| Abdelrazak> is not done by
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Abdelrazak> :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give warning about
| Abdelrazak> missing cases in a switch is to pass the -Wall
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lars> writes:
Lars> |
Lars> | Abdelrazak> :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to give
Lars> warning about |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lars> writes:
Lars> |
Lars> | Abdelrazak> :-) By the way, the only way for gcc to
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
| >> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
| "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Before running "configure" yes, I have to, configure will
Abdelrazak> fail if CXXFLAGS is not set.
Could you show us what your build process looks like?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
|What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed? I really prefer to
| use
| default in this case because by default it will do the full
| counter update.
| We compile with all warnings enabled.
| Ignoring them is a
That is because we have used '#warning' as '#info'.
Seeing how we ignore them, they should probably
be replaced by plain FIXMEs.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| That is because we have used '#warning' as '#info'.
|
| Seeing how we ignore them, they should probably
| be replaced by plain FIXMEs.
Yes they should.
--
Lgb
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
| > > What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed? I really prefer to
| > use
| >> "default" in this case because by default it will do the full
| >> counter update.
| > We compile with all warnings enabled.
| > Ignoring
> That is because we have used '#warning' as '#info'.
Seeing how we ignore them, they should probably
be replaced by plain FIXMEs.
JMarc
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > That is because we have used '#warning' as '#info'.
|
| Seeing how we ignore them, they should probably
| be replaced by plain FIXMEs.
Yes they should.
--
Lgb
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is indeed late for 1.4.1, but it will definitely go in 1.4.2.
Abdelrazak OK, then please note that there are a number of other
Abdelrazak calls to updateCounters that can be optimized also but I
Abdelrazak did not have the time to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is indeed late for 1.4.1, but it will definitely go in 1.4.2.
Abdelrazak OK, then please note that there are a number of other
Abdelrazak calls to updateCounters that can be
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo