-Original Message-
From: Tim Hutt [mailto:tdh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mon 2/1/2010 7:54 PM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Editing equations as latex rather than graphically.
>Hi, I've searched but I can't find an answer: Is it possible to edit
>the source latex code of equations rath
On 2010-02-02, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>>This way, you can convert an equation to the source text
> If you select the math contents and paste it in text, you'll see the
> LaTeX code.
This used to work with the mouse only in former versions, but it's
fixed now to work also via keybind
>This way, you can convert an equation to the source text
>(which might be desirable for copying as well).
>
>The other way round is already implemented: Mark a valid
>math expression (like \sin(x)) and press Ctrl-M.
>
If you select the math contents and paste it in text, you'll see the
LaTeX code
On 2010-02-01, rgheck wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 02:29 PM, Tim Hutt wrote:
>> On 1 February 2010 19:22, rgheck wrote:
> ... All you have to do is have a special mode where LyX displays the
> raw LaTeX, which it knows how to generate. This would be kind of like
> the "preview" mode, where it displays
The difference w.r.t. an ERT block is that you can see the formatted
result on the screen (but editing through an external editor is not as
comfortable as a collapsable inset).
Remember I have the InsetPreview in my back pocket :)
I didn't follow the thread further, so I don't know what the
On 02/01/2010 05:42 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
rgheck wrote:
One question: isn't it possible to handle this case like the other
external-material objects ?
I mean, imagine you define another kind of external-material object,
the "External Equation" type (e.g., a '*.eq' file), imagine you
a
rgheck wrote:
One question: isn't it possible to handle this case like the other
external-material objects ?
I mean, imagine you define another kind of external-material object,
the "External Equation" type (e.g., a '*.eq' file), imagine you
associate a text editor to such a type, and imagine
On 02/01/2010 03:44 PM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Ah yes, I did that in an equation and it is almost exactly what I want
- just need to be able to edit the text. Without looking at the code,
it doesn't look like you'd have to do much to make it editable. I
might have a go some time.
rgheck wrote:
Ah yes, I did that in an equation and it is almost exactly what I want
- just need to be able to edit the text. Without looking at the code,
it doesn't look like you'd have to do much to make it editable. I
might have a go some time.
It's harder than you think, in the general case,
On Feb 1, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Tim Hutt wrote:
> On 1 February 2010 19:22, rgheck wrote:
>> Try View>Source if you want to *see* the LaTeX.
>
> Ah yes, I did that in an equation and it is almost exactly what I want
> - just need to be able to edit the text. Without looking at the code,
> it doesn
On 02/01/2010 02:29 PM, Tim Hutt wrote:
On 1 February 2010 19:22, rgheck wrote:
Try View>Source if you want to *see* the LaTeX.
Ah yes, I did that in an equation and it is almost exactly what I want
- just need to be able to edit the text. Without looking at the code,
it doesn't look
On 1 February 2010 19:22, rgheck wrote:
> Try View>Source if you want to *see* the LaTeX.
Ah yes, I did that in an equation and it is almost exactly what I want
- just need to be able to edit the text. Without looking at the code,
it doesn't look like you'd have to do much to make it editable. I
On 02/01/2010 01:54 PM, Tim Hutt wrote:
Hi, I've searched but I can't find an answer: Is it possible to edit
the source latex code of equations rather than edit the equations in a
graphical way? I much prefer this method for equations and in my mind
it is one of the things that makes latex superi
13 matches
Mail list logo
