Re: Proposal: XSBC-Bugtracker in debian package

2009-08-29 Thread Ryan Abel
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Graham Cobb wrote: > On Saturday 29 August 2009 16:23:43 Ryan Abel wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Graham Cobb wrote: >> > I presume a garage tracker is an acceptable URL.  If Ed ever gets the >> > chance to do his "autobuild from garage" proposal he co

Re: Subversion and libesd?

2009-08-29 Thread Graham Cobb
On Saturday 29 August 2009 15:08:43 Jeremiah Foster wrote: > On Aug 28, 2009, at 13:53, Graham Cobb wrote: > > On Thursday 27 August 2009 23:23:57 Jeremiah Foster wrote: > >> It has gone through the builder, but has not shown up in the file > >> system as a deb yet. > > > > It still hasn't shown up

Re: Proposal: XSBC-Bugtracker in debian package

2009-08-29 Thread Graham Cobb
On Saturday 29 August 2009 16:23:43 Ryan Abel wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Graham Cobb wrote: > > I presume a garage tracker is an acceptable URL.  If Ed ever gets the > > chance to do his "autobuild from garage" proposal he could default this > > to the associated tracker! > > Accept

Re: Proposal: XSBC-Bugtracker in debian package

2009-08-29 Thread Ryan Abel
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Graham Cobb wrote: > I presume a garage tracker is an acceptable URL.  If Ed ever gets the chance > to do his "autobuild from garage" proposal he could default this to the > associated tracker! > Acceptable, but probably not preferable. I'd like to see everybody m

Re: Subversion and libesd?

2009-08-29 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Aug 28, 2009, at 13:53, Graham Cobb wrote: > On Thursday 27 August 2009 23:23:57 Jeremiah Foster wrote: >> It has gone through the builder, but has not shown up in the file >> system as a deb yet. > > It still hasn't shown up in the repository. libsoup2.4 is in the SDK - can you use that? Je

Re: open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread Jason Edgecombe
I believe MIT and GPL are compatible: See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#X11License This license is sometimes called the /MIT license/, but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software Simón Pena wrote: > I'm not an expert, so I'd wait for anothe

Re: open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread Simón Pena
I'm not an expert, so I'd wait for another opinion, but take a look at this: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/#Expat I think it's the same license, and they say they're compatible. 2009/8/29 gary liquid : > hi, > > I am interested in picking up some of the examples from the maemoexamples > c

Re: open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread gary liquid
haha maybe i should have opened my eyes http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License /thread before it even started On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM, gary liquid wrote: > hi, > > I am interested in picking up some of the examples from the maemoexamples > collection provided by nokia. > ( > https:

open source licensing of maemo 5 example code MIT vs GPL

2009-08-29 Thread gary liquid
hi, I am interested in picking up some of the examples from the maemoexamples collection provided by nokia. ( https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/?root=maemoexamples) When I went looking, I find many are licensed under a permissive MIT license. this is great and open source