RE: Touchy selection business

2003-12-04 Thread MisterX
That's it! Thanks very much Dave!!! > >The problem is that there is no way of knowing what stack > >(given palettes exist) contains the current selection. > > How about > >put the long id of the selectedfield into s3 > > Does that give you what you need? > > Dave > __

Re: Player messages

2003-12-04 Thread Jack Rarick
I've used the playPaused handler as a part of the player script. It works pretty well - wanted to use playStopped but it never worked. Hope this helps! Jack Rarick Braintree Athletic Systems On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 08:41 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: I am playing a series of QT sound-onl

Player messages

2003-12-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
I am playing a series of QT sound-only movies by changing the filename of a player. A playstopped handler is supposed to trigger when the player is done and then loads the next sound file. I am not getting a playstopped message if the stack containing the player is frontmost. As soon as I click

[OT] Sparta (was Re: Metacard support)

2003-12-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Wilhelm Sanke wrote: > I have done some more benchmarking, which I will report about, > concerning the relative speeds of the MC and Rev IDEs both for using the > IDEs during the development and for building standalones. I think I have > found sort of a "critical mass" of controls where the Rev ID

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Wilhelm Sanke
As I will be offline for the next five days, two remarks: First, I will follow Richard's advice to ask my questions again next week when I am back and Rev may have rounded up their new troops by then. I have done some more benchmarking, which I will report about, concerning the relative speeds

Re: Multiple sounds playing at once - how?

2003-12-04 Thread Alex Rice
On Dec 4, 2003, at 2:43 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: I may be mistaken but I don't believe the FMOD external inherently provides multi-channel audio support. The benefit of the external (as explained to me by the author) is support for various file types that would otherwise require QT for playback.

Re: Multiple sounds playing at once - how?

2003-12-04 Thread Scott Rossi
On 12/4/03 1:36 PM, "Alex Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This will play as many channels as >> can be accommodated by memory. Unfortunately, there's no modern day >> equivalent. > > There is also this new, potentially xplatform external. I haven't used > it but it looks interesting > >

Re: Multiple sounds playing at once - how?

2003-12-04 Thread Alex Rice
On Dec 4, 2003, at 2:23 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: This will play as many channels as can be accommodated by memory. Unfortunately, there's no modern day equivalent. There is also this new, potentially xplatform external. I haven't used it but it looks interesting

Re: Multiple sounds playing at once - how?

2003-12-04 Thread Scott Rossi
On 12/4/03 1:08 PM, "Karl Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking for suggestions on how to get multiple sounds to play at > once using MetaCard 2.4.3. There is no native option other than player objects (which you claim eat up processor time but if you're making a game, I'm not sure why

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Dom wrote: > Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> While "MetaCard" as a product is gone the engine lives on under the name >> Revolution, with a larger and faster-growing audience than it's ever known >> before. > > Take a look on the data with a text editor, you will see something as

Multiple sounds playing at once - how?

2003-12-04 Thread Karl Becker
I'm looking for suggestions on how to get multiple sounds to play at once using MetaCard 2.4.3. I currently use the play command (play audioClip, specifically) to play AIFF sounds. I had used the play videoClip command in many past projects, letting my file size be smaller by using QuickTime

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Dom
Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While "MetaCard" as a product is gone the engine lives on under the name > Revolution, with a larger and faster-growing audience than it's ever known > before. Take a look on the data with a text editor, you will see something as : #!/bin/sh # MetaCard

Re: Touchy selection business

2003-12-04 Thread Dave Cragg
At 6:50 am +0100 4/12/03, MisterX wrote: hi everyone, Im making a long overdue tool that's just too fruity! But i came across a limitation... on mouseenter put the selection into s1 -- bla bla bla put the selectedchunk into s2 -- char x to y of field 1 put the selectedfield into s3 -- field

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Alex Rice wrote: > Although the thread is about the metacard project, here my observations > about the use-revolution list. I guess it is NOT an ambivalence about > the metacard project, rather support problems in general. > > IMHO there are lots of threads on the use-revolution list that need >

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Dr . John R . Vokey
I won't repeat Wilhelm's comments both to save space and to acknowledge the fact that I think most of us agree with the general sentiment. As a long-time supporter of Metacard (MC), I, too, have lamented in previous posts about the directions that RR has taken. I won't repeat those either. I

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Simon Lord wrote: > I have to wonder about all the people out there that have used > HyperCard and SuperCard or XTalk and never heard of MetaCard. Precisely. Scott is an excellent engineer, but has no illusions about being a marketer. The buzz is all about Revolution. > I switched from HyperCa

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Simon Lord
To use the current version of the engine with the MC IDE you need to go to runrev.com and download a package named "Revolution". You can rename it to anything you like, but for communicating with the community as a whole it may be less confusing to just use its current name. I guess this would

Re: Metacard support

2003-12-04 Thread Alex Rice
On Dec 3, 2003, at 6:05 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: I don't think it's fair to ascribe a less-than-Raney level of responsivness to "reluctance". There may be any number of factors involved, not the least that they may simply be busy. I agree with that conclusion, but I have similar concerns as Wi