The superuser (unix) or administrator (windows) should NEVER be permitted login
access via SSH. If you need such access, log in as an unprivileged user and
request an access upgrade (i.e. "su" in unix).
Didn't our mailing-list host administrator declare this thread closed (as off
topic)...?
_
Hi All,
I've heard some suggestions not to do this, but I plan along with gmail
and some others to do it anyway... ;-)
I would like to strip off any headers for my connection to my own smtp
server, which are authenticated.
So I have enabled filter_sender - however filter sender will not allow
m
Op 16 feb 2010, om 21:30 heeft David F. Skoll het volgende geschreven:
However, for cygwin, it keeps defaulting to
my windows user and not "root" and that's the problem.
Just use the right Control Command entry; see the watch-mimedefang
man page.
Or, specify the right user in the ssh_confi
Cliff Hayes wrote:
> However, for cygwin, it keeps defaulting to
> my windows user and not "root" and that's the problem.
Just use the right Control Command entry; see the watch-mimedefang man page.
-- David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other
On 2/16/2010 1:37 PM, Cliff Hayes wrote:
I can ssh from my windows instance of cygwin to the mimedefang server. I
also established a trust relationship by exchanging ssh keys. I do that all
the time to automate ssh tasks. However, for cygwin, it keeps defaulting to
my windows user and not "roo
I can ssh from my windows instance of cygwin to the mimedefang server. I
also established a trust relationship by exchanging ssh keys. I do that all
the time to automate ssh tasks. However, for cygwin, it keeps defaulting to
my windows user and not "root" and that's the problem. I can override
Hello,
Although I was guilty enough to start and contribute this thread, I'm
luckily also hypocritical enough to request that it end.
Thanks,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID
On 2/16/2010 10:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Vista is irrelevant. If you read any trade literature at all you would
never have touched it in the first place. Just like any X.0 version of a
linux distribution. But realistically, the problem in Vista was changing
the driver interface, something that
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:51:21AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
I take it you don't read the changelogs on linux distribution updates to
see the historic bugs that are still being found and fixed. You should.
Or, read the MIMEDefang changelog to see the ten-year-old bug fixed in
-BETA4 :)
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Unfortunately, it seems we need just *one more* beta before 2.68-final
can be released.
Please try 2.68-BETA-5 available at http://www.mimedefang.org/download.
I promise that if this one's good, it will be 2.68-final. :-)
Changes since 2.67 f
Les Mikesell wrote:
[...]
> Vista is irrelevant. If you read any trade literature at all you would
> never have touched it in the first place. Just like any X.0 version of
> a linux distribution. But realistically, the problem in Vista was
> changing the driver interface, something that Linux d
On 2/16/2010 10:33 AM, Ben Kamen wrote:
On 2/16/2010 10:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Windows 2000 is a decade old now - and was not even intended to be a
desktop OS. And you need to defrag after making big disk changes. If you
don't already see why this is a bad comparision, try installing a
10-y
On 2/16/2010 10:02 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Windows 2000 is a decade old now - and was not even intended to be a
desktop OS. And you need to defrag after making big disk changes. If you
don't already see why this is a bad comparision, try installing a
10-year old Linux server distro and try to up
On 2/16/2010 8:45 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
The frustration of having to run a Windows desktop would drive me insane.
Making the switch caused some grief, but I think it was worth it in the
long run. If nothing else, patches don't eventual bog the system down like
they do in Windows. If you
On 2/16/2010 8:45 AM, wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
Making the switch caused some grief, but I think it was worth it in the
long run. If nothing else, patches don't eventual bog the system down like
they do in Windows. If you don't believe me, take a fresh machine and
install Windows 2000 on it. Time
DFS wrote on 02/12/2010 06:54:27 PM:
> I must confess, I've never understood people who administer Linux
servers,
> yet don't run a Linux desktop. Heck, run Linux in VMWare if you must,
> but at least use proper desktop tools to administer a Linux server.
When I first started using Linux for pro
Marcus wrote:
> I'd like to disable spamassassin checks for all emails sent from the
> host mimedefang is running on (= localhost). But how can I distinguish
> between an email sent by localhost and an email which is resubmitted via
> localhost because of mimedefang's stream_by_domain function. Ch
Cliff Hayes wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> It is fairly difficult to imagine a box that is still running today that
> couldn't handle a GUI
That's not the point. Any software installed on a machine is a potential
vulnerability. I would never install X on a server.
> I also tried xming. I ran
18 matches
Mail list logo