I recently read an article from facebook on password cracking. It got
me thinking about how useful dedicated hardware might be for hashing
passwords.
Source:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/05/how-crackers-make-minced-meat-out-of-your-passwords/
Fairly basic stuff (MD5, brute & dictionary
On 8/7/2013 2:09 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Normally port-restricted cone, or with static-port it's similar to symmetric
(but obviously static-port can't work when two internal machines use
the same port).
With increasing use of cgnat in some large service provider networks you can
be sure to s
I'm dealing with old software that uses old NAT traversal techniques. I
specifically need to select the NAT variation as defined by RFC 3489
(section 5).
Generally I've used nat-to's 'static-port' option and gotten around this
issue. After adding some clients host-side, it seems like NAT tra
I've always taken for granted the compiler I used -- until I read this
thread. I've used buggy compilers before, such as fxc. I was even
greatly affected by a bug in gcc and Apple. Although it caused me to
contentedly switch to Microsoft, I still did not acknowledge my
compiler's performance
On 7/12/2013 5:12 PM, Alexander Hall wrote:
use the raw device, /dev/rwd0c, not the block device.
Tried: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rwd0c bs=64k
It runs at ~72MB/s.
Thanks!
5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
spkr0 at pcppi0
lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7
it0 at isa0 port 0x2e/2: IT8718F rev 1, EC port 0x290
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using ex
I have a disk -- IIRC, Seagate Barracuda 160gb 7200RPM 8MB Cache SATA
3.0GB/s
dmesg:
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0:
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 152626MB, 312579695 sectors
wd0 (pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 6
However, when I run `dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/wd0c bs=1M' After 3-
On 7/5/2013 8:50 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
so yes that indeed seems like crazy things in windows
The documentation says to send a HUP signal to mountd to reload the
changes in /etc/exports. However, after making changes, I am still able
to mount *and* open files from entries I removed in /etc
On 7/5/2013 7:33 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
you want nested nfs mounts which nfsv3/2 can't provide
the export is associated to the mount point, it won't cross device limits
either put /usr/src in the same file system, or use another nfs host
Thanks! I think for now, I'll just export /usr/src/s
I just setup NFS, and have gotten it working with my Windows 7 machine.
Basically, I'm working on a driver and want to use a graphical IDE.
/etc/exports:
#
/usr -maproot=root -alldirs -network=192.168.37 -mask=255.255.255.0
/usr/src -maproot=root -alldirs -network=192.168.37 -mask=255.255.255.0
On 7/4/2013 10:27 AM, Remco wrote:
It has an AUTOCONF_VERBOSE define that can be used to get more verbose output,
though I don't remember how useful it is.
Looking at config(8), I think you should be able to set it in your copy of the
GENERIC file as:
option AUTOCONF_VERBOSE=1
ugh, I enabled AUTO
On 7/4/2013 10:27 AM, Remco wrote:
On Wednesday 03 July 2013 19:11:19 Nathan Goings wrote:
...
I would think if the attach failed it would be in /var/log/messages.
How would I debug this? If the attach is failing, I might try crafting
it to use a different driver. (guess I should try printf
Thanks for your response!
On 7/3/2013 1:07 AM, Remco wrote:
AFAIK this is step one. Assuming you added the PCI IDs correctly, the driver's
attach function should run. However, to the best of my understanding, you
chose a more or less random attach function for your unsupported device.
My guess i
I purchased an Edimax EW-7128Gn that contains a ralink RT3060 chip and
it's unrecognized.
dmesg:
vendor "Ralink", unknown product 0x3060 (class network subclass
miscellaneous, rev 0x00) at pci4 dev 0 function 0 not configured
The documentation says a/g/n but this is a b/g/n. Ralink's drivers
14 matches
Mail list logo
