http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjA1Mw
Thoughts?
Marcos Laufer wrote:
>
> > You didn't read it and you didn't pay attention to
> statement in bold
> > either. I could tell you what to do to fix it, but then you
> wouldn't
> > learn from it. If it wasn't explain there, I would be happy to tell
> > you, but it is there and pretty clear as wel
After applying the patches, you want to go into if_nfe.c, and after
line 244 (PCI_PRODUCT_NVIDIA_MCP55_LAN2) you would want to put
"sc->sc_encap_delay = 10;"
On 6/27/07, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 10:50, Tony Lambiris wrote:
> You
apply cleanly
against 4.1-RELEASE.
http://lysergik.com/~tony/openbsd/
On 6/25/07, patrick keshishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/24/07, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 24 June 2007 13:50, patrick keshishian wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've be
You should be able to find a better system than this.. I bought a
Shuttle SN25P that runs OpenBSD very nicely. There are only a few
issues. The on-board sound (some Via Envy24 chipset) doesn't work. It
doesn't really matter because I use a M-Audio MobilePre (for tracking
guitar stuff) that is conn
> OpenBSD is free as in air.
>
> We'll stick to our principles for reasons entirely
> dissasociated from those problems, and noone will ever really
> understand.
Because you can.
Because it's there.
Most mortals dare not even attempt.
Sebastian Rother wrote:
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2007 11:12:54 -0700
> "Ted Unangst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 5/6/07, Sebastian Rother <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello everybody,
> > >
> > > I`ve a problem with one HDD wich has 3 empty Partitions at the
> > > beginning. I wanted to rem
Jason Beaudoin wrote:
>
>
>
> > Use all the tricks you can for YOUR solution, including:
> > * lots of "small" partitions
>
> What are the reasonings behind this?
>
> Thanks for the awesome post!
>
I think it runs something like this
If there is a problem somewhere on the disk,
if it's all
Lars D. Nooden wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > You've left out the extremely important fact that many vendors
> > interpret acceptance of blobs by any "free" OS as validating their
> > position of not releasing adequate documentation -- so accepting blobs
> > (even when "th
On 16/03/07, Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 06:03:49]:
>
> > http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
> > ---
> > *security-announce* Security announcements. This low volume list
> receives
>
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
---
*security-announce* Security announcements. This low volume list receives
OpenBSD security advisories and pointers to security patches as they become
available.---Martin and Karl have valid points in their initial emails.
/Tony S
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2007 09:13:19 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> > 2007/3/13, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
>
> > Just a reminder: security-announce exists for messages like
> this. Use
> > it or delete it.
> >
sts I've build a
> >> simple rule:
> >>
> >> block log all
> >> pass in log on $inf_if proto udp from { $int_if:network 0.0.0.0 } \
> >> port 68 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
I belive that dhcpd uses bpf to read the packets, it will see them no matter
how you configure your rules.
/Tony
Greg Thomas wrote:
>
> On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> > >
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0
-387620
c: 390721968 0 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0
-387620
Most likely, the disklabel or boot cod
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
>
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> >> I read through the mailing list archives and found a thread
> explaining that
> >> the disklabel is stored around the beginning of partition 'a'
> and that one
> >> should allocate a small partition 'a' which should not be made
> part o
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
> Does the name really matter?
Yes.
> Whether your partition is called 'a' or > 'd', doesn't the disklabel
> get stored into the beginning of the first
> partition anyway?
No.
Actually, you have 16 partitions stored in the disklabel.
This is OpenBSD not DOS.
not great reviews.
> thanks
>
>
The cisco website contains lots of quality documentation about
routing and routing protocols. The book Internet Routing Architectures
by Sam Halabi is also good.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
Joachim Schipper wrote
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:42:14PM -0800, smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:07:01 -0600, Damian Wiest wrote
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:53:48PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > > > smith wrote:
> > > > >Why?:
> > > > >
> > > > >I've received a few new computers t
chefren wrote:
>
> On 1/9/07 1:22 PM, Richard P. Welty wrote:
>
> ..
>
> > yes, it seems to me that the author of this proposal doesn't really
> > understand the huge gap between a conventional file system and
> > a full up RDBMS.
>
> I do.
>
You don't.
How do you handle physical defects in the sto
chefren wrote
> To get it started we should add some hooks of course, and when it's
> working FFS should be dumped. Of course the database file system can
> still save "blobs", being Oracle database or whatever.
>
How do you use this elegant filesystem to bootstrap
the OS which handles this ele
Greetings!
~
Merry Christmas!
Wishing you...
and your family the Christmas season's joys and
wonders. Enjoy the holiday.
Sincerely,
AnthonysTshirts.com
~
AnthonysTshirts.com
2269 S. University Drive - Suit
Marco S Hyman wrote:
> To me (and I'll be the first to
> admit that this is nothing but opinion and I won't pretend that my opinion
> is any better than yours) I see more harm than good in blocking icmp.
> I like it when other people tell me I've screwed something up because I
> can find it and
or in design as compared to
> Zebra/Quagga.
>
> Side comments?
>
>
Why is emacs in the ports tree when we have vi ?
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
ed environment ?
I have some vague memory of it being the length of the data in the mbufs,
but I don't have any real understanding of what actually is being moved
around the kernel.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
Laurence Tratt
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:19:33AM +0100, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
>
> > sometimes I get the right resolution (1280x1024) sometimes only standard
> > vga (600x480).
> >
> > How can I tweak my system to get a reliable KDM with a resolution of
> > 1280x1024?
>
> I'm not sure exactl
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> Now let us come to disklablels.
There is one disklabel per disk, not one disklabel per DOS partition.
The DOS partitions come into play only while the BIOS is booting
After that, the DOS partitions can contain any nonsense you like.
I suspect you'll do better with n
;tbradapt PPPoE-ATM-AAL5-LLCSNAP" per queue so I could support
other type of links
also, but I can never find the time to actually do it.
Time to try to get the kids to sleep.
/Tony
On 08/10/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well its PPPoE over DSL here ..
>
>
On 08/10/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/10/06, S t i n g r a y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > it is asymmetric
>
>
> What bandwidth have you configured the shaper for ?
>
Doh !
> altq on $extif cbq bandwidth
27;t consider the line to be full even
if it in reality is getting cained.
Since I'm stuck with PPP over DSL I have to modify the token
bucket regulator for the shaping to work well.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
I wrote a stats script for PF that can show bandwidth per label.
http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
If you can identify your user with rules that match a label it would work.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn&#
ZIP archive
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22/09/06, edgar mortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tony what version of openbsd r u using? can you send me a pkg_info
> list so i can see what packages you have installed on your box as well
> as the exact versions for python, mod_python and apache
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>
> since the openbsd project prides itself on being especially
> proactive about
> debugging, it would not surprise me to learn that there is automated code
> auditing going on. is this already the case? i didn't see openbsd
Automating stuff you do NOT understand stands
Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
>
> We know one reason why we never got documentation. Bit by bit more
> information has come out to show that the hardware design is an
> embarrasment and there are countless bugs and shortcomings.
>
Surprising? Not really.
Affects ONLY OpenBSD? Not a chance.
That's
Andy Ruhl wrote:
>
> On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
>
> Let me start by saying I'm probably not qualified to reply to this
> thread, but I was never worried about making a fool out of myself
> befo
On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
> > I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
> > rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it only works with
> > CBQ. http://ww
On 23/08/06, tony sarendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
> > > I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
> > &
On 23/08/06, Julien TOUCHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tony sarendal wrote on 22/08/2006 08:32:
> > I wrote a script to generate graphs for the queues using python and
> > rrdtool a while back when I needed it, although it only works with
> > CBQ. http://ww
I needed it, although it only works with CBQ.
http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
/Tony S
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
of ignorance I have it
> would be appriaciated ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Frans
>
>
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
age
again a few times and consider that state is created for each interface.
An inbound keep state rule on one interface can specify which queue the
return packets
should end up in, and outbound keep state rule on the other side can specify
which queue the packets should use there.
Now it's
Will H. Backman wrote:
>
> Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Will H. Backman wrote:
> >
> >> The console on OpenBSD 3.9 release doesn't seem to log unknown username
> >> or failed login attempts anywhere.
> >>
> >
> > See this commit:
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/syslog.conf#rev1.14
>
> > >But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than
> GPG.
> > >
> > >Any recommendations?
> > >
> >
> > mutt has less calories and will make girls want to have sex with you.
> maybe the
> > second part is ju
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
>
> But little change by little change will isolate
> insecurities until a system is secure, right? (didn't somene coin the
> phrase "security is a process"?)
Little change by little change will isolate little insecurities.
Little change by little change will e
> >
Internet Routing Architetures by Sam Halabi.
2nd edition for $39 on amazon.
> (3) the home gateway machine is a PII-350 w/ 64MB ram. is this too slow
> for
> > doing what i have asked about in (1)?
With more memory it could in theory do what you want,
but in rea
pppoe will provide me nearly the same bandwith like
> the Windows-pppoe-Tool. :-)
> So if you4ve a DSL-connection wich is maybe faster then 4Mbit.. use the
> kernel pppoe (even I don4t know how good it performs). :)
I run the kernel pppoe on a 7616/448 kbps dsl link.
It works just fin
so since a nearly uncountable number of years.
>
> Something like this in /etc/fstab helps.
> /dev/wd0b /tmpmfs rw,-m0,-s204800 0 0
and swap is encrypted by default
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sysctl vm.swapencrypt.enable
vm.swapencrypt.enable=1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/Tony
Peter Philipp wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 02:10:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> > Peter Philipp wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I heard he bitches because he's right most of the time and
> people realise
> > > this.
> >
> > Actually 90+
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
> I heard he bitches because he's right most of the time and people realise
> this.
Actually 90+ percentile.
(Particularly when he "ought" to be only 50+ percentile)
m if you really think it's useful to you (or your diploma
> exercise).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rogier
>
> --
> If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
>
>
Read /etc/rc and understand everything in it.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
Nick Holland wrote:
>
> Bob Beck wrote:
> ...
> > IMNSHO, a root password for single user makes the system *LESS*
> > secure, and I'm dead serious. I would object to any attempt to commit
> > changes to OpenBSD to have one by default. Why? Real simple: *because
> > you asked this question*. -
Hello,
I have a question about firewall rules on openbsd. Should I ask here for
help?
Tony
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 17. June 2006 18:36, Deanna Phillips wrote:
> ...
> > As I see it, this is an example of working _against_ a project
> > instead of with and for it. A personal NIH syndrome, if you
> > will. It's not just some Linux thing he put together that also
Siju George wrote:
>
> On 6/17/06, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Han Boetes wrote:
> >
> > > I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
> > > package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
> > > fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
>
Fred Crowson wrote:
>
> Hi Misc,
>
> I keep getting the following error, when trying to mount a 2GB Sony
> Memory Stick Pro Duo (MSX-M2GN) in my Sony T7 digital camera:
>
> nike:fred /home/fred> sudo mount /mnt/t7
> mount_msdos: /dev/sd1i on /mnt/t7: Inappropriate file type or format
>
> Can anyone
Breen Ouellette wrote:
>
> Darrin Chandler wrote:
> > Look, it's pretty obvious from early exchanges in this thread that these
> > issues have been discussed by the principal parties over a fairly long
> > period of time. How many brilliant insights have been added by this
> > thread? More importan
ill. No users at your-other-domain.tld
> recieve spam.
>
> Look up the definition of the "tuple" in the spamd references.
>
> DS
>
>
>From the emails earlier in the thread I was expecting something else than
greytrapping.
Terms like "spam reporting engine&qu
ute them to the spam trap. What point
would
it be to identify the spam with the To: header if all email for those
addresses end up
in a spam trap anyway ?
So if people route specific unused email addresses to spam traps,
what do they actually do with the received emails to reduce spam
to legitimat
ach page so that crawlers would spam it. also, we had a
> few systems accounts, not supposed to receive mail, act as spam
> traps which proved to be quite efficient.
>
>
So what do you guys do with the email hitting the spam traps ?
My email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been used as Fr
Travers Buda wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:10:13 -0700
> "Hank Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> > There has been some discussion of late on this list about Hifn's
> > policy with respect to releasing documentation to the general
> > public. That discussion lead to a great dea
Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:31:59PM +, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> > Hello,
> > My ntfs amd comaq diag. partition is not in the disklabel.
> > Unfortunately I don't know how to add correctly in the disklabel.
> > I've read the faq 14.16.1 but it only shows a modification.
Eliah Kagan wrote:
>
> On 6/6/06, Roger Neth Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even OpenBSDin my humble opinion, the safest operating system on the
> > planetis crackable, if you allow anyone to come and pound away at its
> > network interface.
> >
> > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972281
rwise cannot.
New ear phones and "vulgar display of power" with Pantera also does
the trick. My old ultra10's seemed really quiet, and as a bonus my
manager stopped asking questions across the office.
/Tony
ev. 1
sf7 at pci3 dev 7 function 0 "Adaptec AIC-6915" rev 0x03: irq 9 address
00:00:d1:ee:11:30
sqphy7 at sf7 phy 1: Seeq 80220 10/100 PHY, rev. 1
/Tony
Federico Giannici wrote:
>
>
> I have just switched to a multiprocessing kernel (3.9-stable i386) with
> a dual core Athlon 64.
>
> I noticed that "top" command now have two "CPUx" rows, one for each CPU.
> But "iostat" has only one "cpu" column.
>
> Question 1: are the iostat's cpu values a mean o
akonsu wrote:
>
> in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
> packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
> service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
Exactly.
(And I don't seem to hear a lot about keeping OpenBSD patched up-to-
Adam uttered following nonsense.
> "Linux programs" have nothing to do with anything,
That is a good characterization of SMP and scaling?
> and your desire to make a big stupid thread of bullshit is quite annoying.
You are annoyed.
My desire is a small thread.
Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> OpenBSD scales very well an most tasks you'll find.
> There are some exceptions tho. That unfortunately includes threads.
Out of curiosity, what happens when you run apache on SMP hardware
where the libraries are not "thread safe"? (or whatever it's called)
Adam wrote:
>
> On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:58:39 -0500 "Tony Abernethy"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Adam wrote:
> > > The question was about scalability.
> >
> > I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
>
>
Adam wrote:
> The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Methinks there is a problem with scalability if you cannot even
add two numbers together. (Well maybe with Lisp and infinite tapes)
Dijkstra had an analogy with comparing, as a means of
misiu wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
> what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
> thought give it a nother try.
> Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
> Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and lat
Marcin Wilk wrote:
>
> Hi
> I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with default Apache with SSL over two
> VirtualHosts witht he same IP.
>
> Here is how it works in there:
>
> NameVirtualHost *:80
> NameVirtualHost *:443
Regardless of what you can put in any configuration,
Port 80, http 1.1+ (I think) allows
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> On 5/23/06, prad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrot
> > > You can consider short-circuiting of Boolean evaluation
> greedy, but it a
> > > feature which may also save clock cycles if the right-most
> sub-expressions
> > > are costly to eval
ee was completed by the provider black-holing
the target
to protect the other customers in the network. A few of the attacks were
more clever
than just aiming at a customers site and also took out ISP infrastructure
like dns where
the domains were handled.
Aaahhh... the good old days...
/Tony
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
>
> I have used lynx for years as a file browser as well as web browser
> (when I can) and it is routine for me to "fix" /etc/lynx.conf to show
> me dotfiles.
>
> Recently I need to inspect lots of text files and sometimes edit a few
> so I set vi to be the system editor fo
Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> > On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
> > > >
SkyBlueshoes wrote:
>
> I've just installed OpenBSD 3.8...my first ever *nix. I've got most up
> and running, but I'm having problems recieving email. I followed the
> guidelines on this page http://www.nomoa.com/bsd/mailServer.htm to the
> letter. All the localhost tests work, but when I try t
You log stuff in your time zone.
I log stuff in my time zone.
When your stuff and my stuff interact, that's a very confused log.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Bruno Carnazzi
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: misc
> Subject:
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
>
> i have a single CSV file that is 2.5GB (!) unzipped which i need to either
> partition into chunks or read from directly. trying to open it
> with vi doesn't
> work since 2.5GB >> 500MB, the size of the /var partition on this machine.
> opening with vi gives a "/var: wr
Darrin Chandler wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:14:06PM -0400, Adam wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 May 2006 19:52:10 -0400 Dave Crawford
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > or another viable solution.
> >
> > There's no solution because there's no problem. OpenBSD
> doesn't randomly
> > reord
Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for some hints on evaluating load average.
>
> You can't. It's a statement about "job queue lengths", not about "how
> busy" a machine is. And since different operating systems (and even
> different versions) have made various tweaks to it over the years,
dave feustel wrote:
>
> On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
> > The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
> >then why is kio accessing them?
> >
> > Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
> > answered?
>
> OK I didn't get it the first tim
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> On 5/6/06, Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Me, I'd take a closer look at that j OpenBSD partition.
> > It does NOT look like it corresponds to anything in the DOS partitions.
> > Whether or not you redo the disklabel from
Jacques wrote:
>
> Florin Iamandi wrote:
> > Jacques dixit (2006-05-05, 12:58:02):
> >
> >> May we know, what kind of 'incident'?
> >> Sounds like a security issue.
At this point nobody with a clue will take this or any of its
descendents seriously. Think.
Imagine I've just managed to crack the O
Joseph C. Bender wrote:
>
> Nick Guenther wrote:
> > On 5/6/06, Henrik Borgh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> $ sudo fdisk wd0
> >> Password:
> >> Disk: wd0 geometry: 4864/255/63 [78140160 Sectors]
> >> Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55
> >> Starting Ending LBA Info:
> >>
Peter Fraser wrote:
>
> I was very surprised, that when I was installing
> a 3.9 system, that you can use an empty root password
>
> I accidentally entered a 'return' when it asked for the
> root password, so I entered a 'return" again when
> I was asked to repeat the password, thinking that
> a
The most popular way of managing passwords:
http://iatservices.missouri.edu/images/techknowledge/archive/secconn-0403.jpg
Guaranteed to not require any BLOB.
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> Key mananagement is the most important part. The part that
> continuously will require time and attention from a lot of people, and
> the part that will cause the headaches. The part where the errors
> will be made. System managers experiencing problems and needing to
> g
NAT
> is being used on both of these gateways, and all boxes inside each
> respective gateway are able to reach the internet without problems.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Nathan Johnson
>
>
Did you enable ip forwarding, Nate ?
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
Paulo Manoel Mafra wrote:
>
> Hi misc,
> I would like to create a large partition on a disk, but this disk has a
> known bad block. How could I create the partition without the bad block ?
> One solution is to create two partitions without the bad block and use
> ccd. Is there another solution ?
Cristiano Deana wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources)
> and i got this:
>
> $ uname -rs
> OpenBSD 3.9
> $ su
> Password:
> you are not in group wheel
> Sorry
> $ whoami
> cris
> $ id cris
> uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
> $ grep cris /etc/
Anton Karpov wrote:
>
> Noone here talks about attacking a compiler ;) We're discussing
> differences
> for attacker, depending on compiler available or not.
They should.
There is a classic by Ken Thompson (I think) about using a compiler
to create a back door which has no traces in the source
Anton Karpov wrote
>
> > If he can break in as a lowly user uname -a will tell him what it is
> > anyway. And don't tell me we should disable that command or cause it to
> > lie because then I'll shoot you down another way.
>
>
>
> Re-read my message, please. I didn't tell he cannot stat os version
Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 03:44:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > There is a
> > return (eight);
> > in man style.
>
> But in err() context.
>
> > I suspect that bad things can happen with macros
> > when you do only sensible things with parens.
>
> Good poin
Nick Guenther wrote:
>
> On 4/30/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I wonder what the preferred style of return statments is -- for
> > returning simple values, both styles
> >
> > return foo;
> >
> > and
> >
> > return (foo);
> >
> > are used in the sou
S t i n g r a y wrote:
>
> Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
> but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
> refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
> why is that , i mean what is the criteria of an
> enterprise firewall what is the diffrence between pf &
> M
prad wrote:
[snip]
> (curiously, i've found on my system at least that some
> things seem
> to work faster on openbsd than freebsd.)
>
Shouldn't be a surprise, really.
Efficiency is really more a case of never being too inefficient
rather that occasionally being very efficient. (ie hard.)
Anythi
js wrote:
>
> 2006/4/28, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I wonder why http://www.openbsd.org/books.html still recommend old
> > > daemon book, The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating
> > > System?
> > > As most of you know, there's newer version, The Design and
> > > Implem
; > > to install MRTG and SNMP so that I can get the network utilization.
> > >
> > > Any documentation in the web that anyone can suggest?
>
>
If you use altq and need something to help tweak the queues
have a look at http://www.prefixmaster.com/eyeonpf.php
/Tony
--
T
client
there isn't any config for it.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
401 - 500 of 717 matches
Mail list logo
