On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I dont have obj on ram, or /tmp . Iam using make build.
Use gentoo?
> Thank you
>
> Andres
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Aaron Mason
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andres Salazar
wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
>> wrote:
...
> Setting the controller to AHCI would give OpenBSD access to NCQ where
> available, but the driver would also have to b
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:27:36AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I dont have obj on ram, or /tmp . Iam using make build.
>
> Thank you
>
> Andres
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> >> Hello,
>
Hello,
I dont have obj on ram, or /tmp . Iam using make build.
Thank you
Andres
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
>> any machi
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:02:37AM -0600, Andres Salazar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
> any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
> SATA ii
>
You're not even telling us how you compile userland. How should we
> Hello,
>
> Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
> any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
> SATA ii
>
> On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
> and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that mac
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andres Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
> wrote:
>>> Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
>>> about these results
>>
>> Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
>> databas
On 2/28/2010 12:02 PM, Andres Salazar wrote:
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine that
takes 45min is far better hardware then a DualCore, in this case a
QuadCore with SATA II/sata...
None of us wil
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Bret S. Lambert
wrote:
>> Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
>> about these results
>
> Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
> database you're going to be running.
>
> In addition to helping you cho
> Iam going to use these machines for database and Iam very concerned
> about these results
Honestly, you'd do better asking that on a list dedicated to whatever
database you're going to be running.
In addition to helping you choose hardware to fit your needs, they'll
totally pimp your configs, t
Hello,
Iam confused on the different result I get when I compile userland on
any machine better then a Dual Core 2.5Ghz 2GB RAM 160GB 7200 SATA /
SATA ii
On some machines I get a compile time of 45min, other machines 30min..
and the best of the case I get 30min. Sometimes that machine that
take
11 matches
Mail list logo
