On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:58:26AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>I'd put my $5.00 on APR being the cause of this problem. Mikhail, you
> >>will probably need to patch APR when you build Apache. Try this patch,
> >>which I am guessing will work on NetBSD:
I wasn't surpris
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:49:59PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Ken Simpson wrote:
> >>>Ken, Stas, done as advised. The only test which is failing now (and was
> >>>failing before) is:
> >>
> >>Mikhail, Ken, please submit that patch to dev /at/ apr.apache.org
> >>http://apr.apache.org/. Hopefully i
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:25:03AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
> > I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
> > NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
> >
> > and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do this on
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:38:15AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
> > NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
> >
> > and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do t
I can try and debug this, I've found a NetBSD machine and reproduced the
failure. ./t/TEST -start-httpd doesn't work from the mod_perl test
suite, is there a way to get that working?
bash-2.05b$ ./t/TEST -start-httpd
/tmp/jorton12/root/bin/httpd -d /tmp/jorton12/mod_perl-1.99_16/t -f
/tmp/jorton
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:40:48PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > k714% ./nonblock
> > > found port: 52984
> > > O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
> >
> > This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is
> > working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across a
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 05:15:05PM +1000, Carl Brewer wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >Oh well, having found a NetBSD box to testd this myself, the NetBSD
> >fcntl() is being economical with the truth. It doesn't return
> >O_NONBLOCK yet the socket really is
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:15:23PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
>
> my $should_skip =
> ($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) ||
> ($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
That log
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 10:17:34PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe, as 2.0.52 is about to be released. Can that fix for NetBSD applied to
> the 0.9 trunch (and head) if it does the trick? Thanks.
It's been in both branches for a while so hopefully it will get picked
up, yep.
joe
--
Report prob
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:47:33PM +0200, MARTIN Pierre wrote:
> > Please do:
> > cd src/modules/perl/
> > rm mod_perl.so
> > make -f Makefile.modperl
>
> Here we go:
>
> /data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# rm mod_perl.so
> /data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# make -f Makefile.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:26:43AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >This problem is probably caused by a bogus libperl.a on your system
> >somewhere. What does:
> >
> >ls -l /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE/libperl.* /usr/lib/libperl.* \
> > /us
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 05:02:30PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >If -lperl was specified on the link line and ldd does not show a
> >dependency on libperl.so.N, then barring a complete linker fubar, it
> >must be the case that a libperl.a was linked statical
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 02:42:49PM +0200, Torsten FÃrtsch wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I know one can specify the handler invocation order of the request phases. But
> how to do it?
>
> My problem is, I want to know if a request came in over http or https
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 04:49:55PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> I've been meaning to take care of this since you mentioned it.
>
> http://www.modperlcookbook.org/~geoff/modules/Apache-SSLLookup-2.00_01.tar.gz
>
> I'll probably move it to cpan in the next day or so.
Very nice! Now can I just bo
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 08:37:42PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > Did you try #include'ing mod_ssl.h to pick up the optional function
> > declarations rather than copy'n'pasting them? It should work OK with
> > recent 2.0 releases.
...
> /apache/2.0.52/ssl/perl-5.8.5/include/mod_ssl.h:91:17:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:02:22PM +0530, pradeep kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I have reported a bug. The bug number is 32542. Looking into
> the problem I found that the porblems on both 2.0.43 and 2.0.52 are
> same. The perl_alloc funtion which caused the error as seen from the
> stack trace of 2
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:12:19PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> In fact we already somewhat handle that in modperl_io_apache.h
>
>
>
> #ifdef PERLIO_LAYERS
> [...]
> MP_INLINE void modperl_io_apache_init(pTHX);
>
> #else /* #ifdef PERLIO_LAYERS */
>
> #define modperl_io_apache_init(pTHX)
>
>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:24:30PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >Just make the generated export stub code #ifndef'ed?
> >
> >#ifndef modperl_io_apache_init
> >const void *modperl_hack_io_apache_init = (const void
> >*)modperl_io_apache_ini
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:27:03AM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:12:19PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>In fact we already somewhat handle that in modperl_io_apache.h
> >>
> >>
> >>
&g
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:12:11PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe, do you have an idea why this doesn't work on FreeBSD 5.3 (in jail
> environment). I remember last time you've fixed something about some BSD
> flavor in APR socket lib. Thanks.
That was all the non-blocking-vs-blocking stuff. F
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:18:31AM -0500, William McKee wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:39:46AM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
> > That was all the non-blocking-vs-blocking stuff. First I'd ask whether
> > or not this fails in a non-chroot environment. A chroot will screw up
&g
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:05:31PM -0500, William McKee wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:53:45PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Check for the result of the:
> >
> > "checking if O_NONBLOCK setting is inherited from listening sockets"
> >
> > test when
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 05:35:56PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe, shouldn't the APR API emit some kind of errors in the situation like
> William has with jail env+ac_cv_o_nonblock_inherited thingy, rather than
> silently fail?
The issue is that the configure test couldn't make a decision, but
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:49:10PM +0200, Markus Wichitill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a log handler that is supposed to log whether certain
> HTTP-authenticated customers were able to completely download their digital
> deliveries. The mod_perl 1.x version works just fine.
>
> Now under SuSE Linux
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:35:30PM -0600, Eamon Daly wrote:
> 1. Problem Description:
>
> Hey, all. I'm trying to build mod_perl against the stock
> httpd in RedHat 4ES. The build runs without issue, but
> "make test" fails immediately with the following error:
>
> Can't load '/tmp/mod_perl-2.0.2
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:26:43PM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> The mod_perl 2.0.4 release candidate 1 "Works with Perl 5.10" is ready. It
> can be downloaded here:
>
> http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/mod_perl-2.0.4-rc1.tar.gz
>
> MD5: 1f0a941e8b5f26b6102126ae67ddbb43
> SHA1: 8b2ceede3c7
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:15:19PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:26:43PM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > The mod_perl 2.0.4 release candidate 1 "Works with Perl 5.10" is ready. It
> > can be downloaded here:
> >
> > http://www.apa
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:17 AM, wrote:
>
> > Author: covener
> > Date: Tue May 12 13:17:29 2009
> > New Revision: 773881
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=773881&view=rev
> > Log:
> > backport 772997, 773322, 773342 from
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 02:39:57PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > Given that the semantics of the options has changed, I don't think it's
> > worth changing httpd to maintain any pretence of compile-time or
> > ru
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 05:26:07PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> Attaching my original analysis for security@ which hopefully answers
> that question ;)
attempt 2
I've now had a deeper look into this. I can't see a way to fix the
problem without changing the semantics of the OPT_
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:45:36AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
> Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41
> release candidate.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.tar.gz
>
> MD5 = 7933d3a6a762f087bf7883a1ac2086eb
> SHA1 = 17aa9a8669023aa2f485aa
libapreq2-2.15 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project
are pleased to announce the 2.15 release of libapreq2. This
Announcement notes significant changes introduced by this release.
libapreq2-2.15 is released under the Apache License
version 2.0. It is
CVE-2019-12412: libapreq2 null pointer dereference
Severity: important
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
libapreq2 2.07 to 2.13
Description:
In libapreq2 versions 2.07 through 2.13 inclusive, a flaw in the
multipart parser can deference a null pointer leading to a proce
33 matches
Mail list logo
