[Monotone-devel] Re: [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Lapo Luchini
Thomas Keller wrote: > A new version was released today with these changes: Both Cygwin and FreeBSD packages are delaying because of problems in botan packages that didn't show up while building "manually"... In Cygwin botan doesn't work when compiled with GCC4 and in FreeBSD is missing a digit a

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Jack Lloyd
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:13:47PM +0100, Philipp Gr?schler wrote: > Two questions: > - Why did you mark it unstable? I would personally think that, especially given mtn's excellent test suite for detecting regressions, 0.43 is probably the most stable version, but that is not how things work in

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Philipp Gröschler
Jack Lloyd schrieb: I've submitted an ebuild for 0.43 at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263626 It works for me, anyway. Perfect, thanks! Let's see when it will hit den official portage tree. I downloaded the ebuild file and will test it here during the next days. But previously I'll

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Jack Lloyd
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:59:54AM +0100, Philipp Gr?schler wrote: > Thomas Keller schrieb: >> A new version was released today with these changes: > > That's good news! I hope Gentoo's ebuild will catch up soon, we're still > creeping on 0.40 here ... I've submitted an ebuild for 0.43 at http://

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Zack Weinberg
2009/3/24 Phil Hannent : > Thomas Keller wrote: >> >> Yes, netxx is dead, but this is not a problem, because we still have the >> original (and patched) version in tree. >> >> IIRC Zack works on a netxx replacement using asio, but this will still >> take some time, I guess. (Just to confirm both o

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Phil Hannent
Thomas Keller wrote: > Phil Hannent schrieb: >> Zbigniew Zagórski wrote: >>> One note from me: last few versions i've build&uploaded win32 >>> installers. Now i'm out of time and resources so I don't know when i >>> will find spare time to build win32 version. >>> >>> Please anyone take note of thi

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Thomas Keller
Phil Hannent schrieb: > Zbigniew Zagórski wrote: >> One note from me: last few versions i've build&uploaded win32 >> installers. Now i'm out of time and resources so I don't know when i >> will find spare time to build win32 version. >> >> Please anyone take note of this and build&upload win32 inst

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Phil Hannent
Zbigniew Zagórski wrote: > One note from me: last few versions i've build&uploaded win32 > installers. Now i'm out of time and resources so I don't know when i > will find spare time to build win32 version. > > Please anyone take note of this and build&upload win32 installer. I was just seeing how

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANN] monotone 0.43 released

2009-03-24 Thread Zbigniew Zagórski
2009/3/23 Thomas Keller : > > Hi fellows! > > A new version was released today with these changes: > >  * monotone no longer bundles several required 3rd party libraries; >    this not only makes our life easier but was often requested by >    distributions. >  * monotone can now be configured to u

Re: [Monotone-devel] commit and sink in same transaction

2009-03-24 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Zack Weinberg writes: > 2009/3/23 serg : >> Hi. Can I synchronize (serve, pull, ...) the repository and do commit >> changes in same transaction without data loss through software API? >> Thanks. > > No, but the question as phrased makes no sense in monotone's > framework, so I suspect you're thin