I assumed a DLQ was available.
Paul Clarke
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Non threaded listener on
Windows
MQSeries List
06/24/2002
ase respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DELEGATED - Sent by:MQSeries [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Non threaded listener on Windows
>Paul,
>How are other users who have queues that are not filled but effectively
use
>the same chann
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Non threaded listener on Windows
> >Thanks Paul:
>
> >I 100% agree with the most of your e-Mail. NT threads are really good
and
> worth to use instead of processes >(they could even provide a compl
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Non threaded listener on Windows
> >Thanks Paul:
>
> >I 100% agree with the most of your e-Mail. NT threads are really good and
> worth to use instead of processes >(they could even provide a c
>Thanks Paul:
>I 100% agree with the most of your e-Mail. NT threads are really good and
worth to use instead of processes >(they could even provide a complete
isolation of clients in security terms if MQSeries had some interface for
>it). But here is the scenario that bothers me from time to ti
Re: Non threaded listener on Windows
>Paul,
>Thanks for the explanation.
>So I was right there is no way to run channel agent as a process on NT?
>Except if I run several listeners and enforce a single connection per
listener via Exit :-)?
>Thank you,
>Pavel
Pavel,
The non-th
>Paul,
>Thanks for the explanation.
>So I was right there is no way to run channel agent as a process on NT?
>Except if I run several listeners and enforce a single connection per
listener via Exit :-)?
>Thank you,
>Pavel
Pavel,
The non-threaded listener would be inetd right ? Since Windows d
From: Paul Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@AKH-Wien.AC.AT> on 06/20/2002 05:40 PM CET
Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DELEGATED - Sent by:MQSeries [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Non threaded l
>
DELEGATED - Sent by:MQSeries [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Non threaded listener on Windows
Thanks - it was the MCATYPE I was looking for. It looks like the SRVCONN
channel type doesn't have this attribute. Does it run as a thread in the
listener
>Thanks - it was the MCATYPE I was looking for. It looks like the SRVCONN
>channel type doesn't have this attribute. Does it run as a thread in the
>listener process or run a separate process for the MCA?
>PS To those who will say "But Dave, you should know that stuff" - indeed I
>probably shou
Thanks - it was the MCATYPE I was looking for. It looks like the SRVCONN
channel type doesn't have this attribute. Does it run as a thread in the
listener process or run a separate process for the MCA?
PS To those who will say "But Dave, you should know that stuff" - indeed I
probably should an
11 matches
Mail list logo
