slots and then continue forwarding. While it would wait,
arriving messages would be piling on the first QUEUE in the order according to their
priority, so that they would go to the FIFO queue in this order, too). Would this work
as I think it should (i.e., obey the priority, except for maybe last 10
Pavel,
If I understand you correctly, you would deliver the messages first to a queue with
MSGDLVSQ(PRIORITY) which triggers a job to them move the messages to a FIFO queue.
The only problem I can see with that is that, unless the triggered job is r e a l s
l o w, or unless you trigger on
Pavel,
I'm not entirely sure I understand this priority vs. FIFO delivery dilemma,
so I'll just skip to the questions.
1. If you choose to trigger the forwarding application, it certainly is a
reasonable choice.
2. But, given the second question, the restriction of forwarding message
to just let MQ to prioritize the messages in some
queue with MSGDLVSQ(PRIORITY) and transactionally forward all messages to an
additional queue with MSGDLVSQ(FIFO) from where my application could then work. For
performance reasons I think it is probably better for this new forwarding application
e IBM publication IMS Queue Control Facility for z/OS User's Guide, SC26-9685-02 from the IBM publications website. John Gilmore SystemCraft LLC - Original Message - From: Doug Jenkins Sent: 05 February, 2003 14:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IMS BRIDGE Queues and MQMD-PRIOR
Would adding more MPR's at 6am allow faster handing of the requests?
Doug
"Potkay, Peter M
(PLC, IT)" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IMS BRIDGE Queues and
Peter,
The MQMD-Priority is used by MQ to decide the order in which to send
messages to IMS; they are all queued at the same priority within IMS. I'm
not aware of any priority system on the IMS message queue; even if it
exists, the MQ-IMS Bridge does not take advantage of it.
I su
sages sent after 6 AM get prioritized to be
processed before the previous night's messages? I would like to avoid
creating a separate request queue to be used by the application between 2
and 6 AM. So I thought I might have the front end app set the priority of
the messages sent outside of 2-
Simple way to look at it. MQ provides services to CICS so if CICS is
running at a higher priority then it keep pre-empting its service provider.
Regards
Tim A
We run the MQ at a higher priority than the CICS regions, but below the IMS and DB2.
Glen Shubert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Associate Director
MQSeries Technical Support
IBM Certified Specialist - MQSeries
IBM Certified Solutions Expert - MQSeries
(706) 641-3708
"Williams, Dave (Systems Manag
e-From: Williams, Dave (Systems
Management) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, November 22,
2002 9:43 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Priority
Folks… At what priority do you run your
OS/390 MQ compared to your CICS regions? I’m not at all sure it’s important, but wanted to
poll t
Folks… At what priority do you run
your OS/390 MQ compared to your CICS regions? I’m not at all sure it’s important, but wanted to
poll the list to see what you’re coding.
Thanks!
Dave W.
12 matches
Mail list logo
