On 10.09.20, mjsseppl-m...@yahoo.de wrote:
> On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> Do "H" and look at the headers and you'll see under References:
> <20100919012315.gc36...@fbsd.t60.cpu> <20100919071840.ga26...@murdoc>
> etc.
>
"In-Reply-To:" is also used.
Kind regards
Michael
On 10.09.20, Yue Wu wrote:
> P.S., how does mutt dertermine threads? Maybe it's better and more
> reliable than the ~s Re: way?
For correct threads, i.e. if the user hasn't chosen to use just the
subject line, it uses "References:" which refer to the message-id of the
mail(s) to which it is respon
Sorry - my bad.
As you probably noticed, I was using an old version of mutt - I upgraded
my OS, but the new upgrade had the old version of Mutt.
everything's ok now - and the note taking works fine - thanks to all the
contributors to this thread
:)
Michael
On 10.08.31, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> But you can nothing use as a parameter for a script called from a macro.
> You can not even use:
>
> my_hdr Fcc: ^
>
> which should save the message you are curently writing in the CURRENT
> mailfolder.
I can't get that to work at all - even as a
On a more general level, regarding Jose's idea:
What are the ways to send local messages so that they end up in the mail
spool file?
It seems to me a simple question and I seem to remember being able to do
it, but now when I try to remember how I did it, I can't find the way.
There's a discussio
Hi, Jose.
That is a very interesting set up you have and it would be great if you
could post the relevant parts of your muttrc file and the configuration
of Postfix.
I don't use Postfix - I use Msmtp and Procmail - but I hope that I can
configure Msmtp to do the same as Postfix.
In any case, you
