* Peter T. Abplanalp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-01 12.14 -0700]:
[...]
right. that is what i thought. so the question remains, how does one
develop a web of trust using good judgement while probably being unable
to verify anyone's identity outside of long distance (email, phone, fax, etc)
hi all. just a quick question from a newbie. i usually sign all my
emails but one of the lists i write to complains that it will not accept
emails with attachments due to the fact that they don't want to spread
msft viruses. now it is my understanding that when you sign an email you
are
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:09:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all. just a quick question from a newbie. i usually sign all my
emails but one of the lists i write to complains that it will not accept
emails with attachments due to the fact that they don't want to spread
msft viruses.
begin quoting what Dave Smith said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:33:36PM +0100:
You could succumb to the non-standards-following world and use the
pgp_create_traditional variable. There are also other ways of signing
My two cents:
Succumb. Inline sigs are annoying, and when you get a
Peter, et al --
...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said...
%
% hi all. just a quick question from a newbie. i usually sign all my
Welcome!
% emails but one of the lists i write to complains that it will not accept
% emails with attachments due to the fact that they don't want to spread
Yeah,
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 05:33:36PM +0100, Dave Smith wrote:
You could succumb to the non-standards-following world and use the
pgp_create_traditional variable. There are also other ways of signing
messages that have been used in the past, and many discussions have taken
place here, and
begin quoting what Peter T. Abplanalp said on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 10:37:49AM -0700:
just wondering why the non-standards-following option contains the word
traditional.
Because usage of PGP predates the establishment of standards.
helpfull and it sort of relates to mutt...what is the
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:42:19PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
If you're using GnuPG, see the lsign option.
ok. just to see how things work, i lsigned the key that i got from the
keyserver when i opened the email i am responding to. presumably your
key and email ;-). now when mutt invokes
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:00:39PM -0500, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
ok. just to see how things work, i lsigned the key that i got from the
keyserver when i opened the email i am responding to. presumably your
key and email ;-). now when mutt invokes gpg, i get the same message of
good
Something isn't configured properly in your GnuPG. It sounds like it
doesn't trust YOUR key.
entirely possible but i think everything is set up correctly. here is
what i get when i run a check on my key:
pub 1024D/7D224574 created: 2002-01-09 expires: never trust: -/u
sub
10 matches
Mail list logo
