ichot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jeff Kilbride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:06 PM
> Subject: Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
3.x to get rid of this
problem?
Thanks,
--jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Guilhem Bichot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff Kilbride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February
; The file I was loading was approx. 5MB and none of the data made it to the
> slaves.
>
> Thanks,
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: T
]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:32 AM
Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
> Jeff, Egor,
>
> Guilhem Bichot just found a bug in replication of LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE
in
> 4.0.
>
> Th
selective replication of some tables or databases? If yes,
check also that your LOAD DATA INFILE is not excluded by these rules.
Regards,
Heikki
Innobase Oy
sql query
.
Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE
From: Egor Egorov
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:07:02 +0200
On Thursday 20 February 2003 01:04, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
> I have one master and two slaves all running 3.23.55-max on RedHat 7.3.
> I've had replication up and running smoothly for several days. Today, I
> decided to try out LOAD DATA INFILE on the master. After successfully
> loading on the mast
I have one master and two slaves all running 3.23.55-max on RedHat 7.3. I've
had replication up and running smoothly for several days. Today, I decided
to try out LOAD DATA INFILE on the master. After successfully loading on the
master, I checked both slaves and neither one had the new data. There
