Lou,
I was not able to ping 219.238.192.6 from 192.* space, but was able to
ping it from a non-192.* network in the same AS. It looks like they are
filtering 192.168.0.0/8. Wouldn't be the first time.
Lou Katz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:13:29PM -0400, Christina Klam wrote:
-B
Did they provide a reason for the outage? If so, please let us know
what the issue was.
Felix Bako wrote:
Thank guyz for your Help.
Above.net finaly resolved the issue
Regards
Felix
Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- "Glen Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regarding Keynote support - the company I work for pulls alerts from the
RSS feed they offer. They changed the format of the feed a couple of
months ago without notice, breaking our monitoring and leaving us blind
for some time. When we contacted our service rep, he wasn't even aware
of the
en a predefined threshold of round-trip time is exceeded).
--Matt
On Mar 4, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Darrell Hyde wrote:
Can anybody recommend a vendor for this type of service? I suppose I
could always just get a bunch of VPS accounts here and there and run
smokeping, but I'd really like to avoid that.
or the other of the responses
because you might have been expecting something else. But only if the
two responses agreed would something have been wrong.
> I.e., the roots and the GTLD servers disagree on who is authorative
> for gtld-servers.net.
No, they do not.
Matt
s? :-)
That'd be a fun law to try and enforce, especially against the people who
refuse to accept such long routes (which is, after all, the only thing
that's stopping such long announcements from appearing already). Tunnels
all over the place seems like the only way it'd even be halfway practical.
It's more-or-less how phone number portability works anyway, from what
(little) I know.
- Matt
st always) need to be
> present
> at the site where that phone number is terminated.
>
> I don't know about your IP addresses, but, people can use my IP
> addresses
> from a number of locations which are nowhere near the jurisdiction in
> which
> my network operates, so, I don't really see the correlation here with
> license
> plates or phone numbers.
In order to be using the IP address, your packets (almost always) have to
pass through the device allocated that address.
- Matt
stered
their parent domains via the VeriSign Whois server
(whois.verisign-grs.com).
Matt
rfectly adequate.
>
> And to take that concept to its logical extreme.
>
> A Linux box (*BSD, pick your poison) running Quagga or similar will do
> the job at an extremely low price point.
So if we plug in, say, $2k for the cost of the Linux box, and compare it to
the L3 switch mentio
2002). The issue you may be encountering is that not
every .com/.net registrar supports them.
Matt
y for fear of upsetting your virtual neighbours, it's
reasonable that not specifically informing people that their "unpleasant"
behaviour is unwelcome should imply that such behaviour is acceptable.
- Matt
Semi-related article:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gyYIyHWl3sEg1ZktvVRLdlmQ5hpwD8U1UOFO0
-Matt
On 1/9/08 3:04 PM, "Deepak Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/TenFold-Jump-In-Encrypted-BitTorrent-Traffi
> c-89
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:33:03PM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Quoting Matt Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:35:26AM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >> 2. It doesn't require licensing
> >
> >Plenty of VPN products out there are
her a lack of sense or a blind hatred, using libpcap
in this situation gave me some chuckles, and their "What algorithms are
used?" page scares me a little. I'll stick with OpenVPN, myself.
> Phone: (03) 90001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Gee you Melbournians are advanced... you've already gone to 11 digit phone
numbers...
- Matt
If you are looking for wireless in Chicago I would suggest Business Only
Broadband. I don't have any direct experience with them, but others have
had good things to say. Regardless, I agree with David; wireless is
ideal for short-term bandwidth needs.
-Matt
David E. Smith wrote:
O
They have been updating that ETR every 40 minutes. The first ETR was
supposed to be 9:30.
-Matt
Mills, Charles wrote:
Just saw an ETR of 11:00AM EDT from http://status.cogentco.com
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott
ffic fudging are
limited and quite costly - a lot of folks with lots of bits to push
(I do video) tend to take the "Direct Server Return"/nPath/etc
route. Appliances tend to have support contracts and that allows the
suits to sleep at night too.
--Matt
enter" add-on would vastly improve the current VGA to
long-run-ole-Svideo setup; another trick of the LINX streams - this
would require some speaker coordination though.
I'll be @ NOG40 and would be more then happy to discuss in more detail.
--Matt Peterson
equipment does it's own SNMP thing.
> be carefully accounted for and synchronized, or can I treat them like
> a typical configuration file, where it is obvious if I need it and I
> get them as needed?
They're not critical to the operation of the whole thing, merely the
comprehens
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
http://www.circleid.com/posts/submit_comment/splitting_root_too_late/
I tried to look, but I can't seem to find circleid.com; perhaps
bestbuy is intercepting my dns traffic :)
Sun Apr 08 16:01:25
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig +trace www.circleid.com
;
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Douglas Otis wrote:
Rather than a clearinghouse, require gTLDs, ccTLDs, and SLDs establish
rules regarding access to a 24 hour preview of zone transfers.
You know what would be even safer? Let's go back to ftp'ing a
hosts.txt file around every week or so!
[EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Fergie wrote:
So very clever.
If you're not part of the solution... etc.
I feel so worthless standing next to you, the Solver.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marsh
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Fergie wrote:
The Registry policies, as they stand today, enable criminals.
and airlines enable drug smugglers. idiot.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marshall McLuh
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Gadi Evron wrote:
Back to reality and 2007:
In this case, we speak of a problem with DNS, not sendmail, and not bind.
Your reality must be interesting. In my reality, the problem is with
a client app thats historically exhibited this exact same sort of
"0day" "internet
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007, Fergie wrote:
...and before people starting bashing Gadi for being off-topic, etc.,
I'll side with him on the fact that this particular issue appears to
be quite serious.
Wow, if both gadi and fergie say its important, it must be a real
showstopper.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Looks like this has been resolved. Sorry to bother everyone.
Matt Dean
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dean, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 7:52 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Ramos, Matt
Subject: Anything going on in
[209.51.149.105]
Trace complete.
Thanks in advance.
Matt Dean, MCP, MCDST, MCPS, MCNPS
Cremto Inc. Integrated Technology Consulting
530 Adelaide St. West, Unit 6133
Toronto, Ontario M5V 2K7
Canada
(416) 619-0472
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saved for future use...
Classic.
~
Matt Taber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WMIS Internet http://www.wmis.net
616-281-9647 1-888-482-9647
"Accelerate ... It's a Speed
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Simon Waters wrote:
Yes. Most of the root server traffic is answering queries with
"NXDOMAIN" for non-existant top level domains, if you slave root
on your recursive servers, your recursive servers can answer those
queries directly (from the 120KB root zone file), rather
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
Luke:
It is possible the DNS queries made are for non existent domains, fake
replies, perhaps even making them something in 1918 space, and they MAY
stop being not nice netizens.
Configuring your nameservers to randomly give bad answers isn't
considered
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Simon Waters wrote:
I suspect complex rate limiting may be nearly as expensive as providing DNS
answers with Bind9.
Indeed. It is generally accepted that it is easier to simply scale
your service to provide adequate headroom than implement per-client
traffic policies.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings, NANOGers. I've got a mail cluster that's been spooling about
5 messages for the past week or so (with very little drain and
traffic passing), and my mail admin reports that attempted contacts to
the Yahoo Postmaster are not getting ans
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing *.register.com down (including ns*) from everywhere.
They are apparently under a multi-gbps ddos of "biblical
proportions".
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing *.register.com down (including ns*) from everywhere. Just a
heads-up.
I'll take your word on exhaustively checking every possible
address. BTW, do you mean nameservers down, webservers down, or
something else? Did the Internet break?
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Chris Adams wrote:
Heh. We had an IP (of a customer's mail server) that GoDaddy blocked.
They told us it had been blocked for something like 8 months (at which
time it had not been assigned to any customer); we had zero complaints
on record for that IP. They couldn't tell
This situation subverts BGP's basic loop prevention mechanism. If the
/20 is ever deaggragated into more specifics, a forwarding loop may
result.
If you want to put rounds in the chamber before pointing the muzzle at
your temple, you're free to do so. However, some of us would prefer to
stand
Do providers really do this? Would they install multiple BGP Paths
with different AS Paths (but same length) in their FIB, and yet
advertise only one?
Is the the right thing to do?
What you see in BGP is not necessarily what you get for actual routing.
This isn't the only situation where adv
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Gordon Cook wrote:
This is Gary Kremen owner of SEX dot com.
cohen stole sex.com from kremen and kremen sued and got it back - it looks
like he is trying to force arin to give him cohen's IP assignments sounds
like a grudge match - but it is a shame that he might do ari
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
(Besides, all the binaries on usenet are available via BitTorrent somewhere
anyways; NNTP does not make a good piracy protocol from a technical
perspective, only from an anonymity one)
Do you believe anonymity has a low intrinsic value for internet
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Matt Ghali wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Wed Aug 23 17:47:26 $ dig +short ptr 1.2.2.4.in-addr.arpa
vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net.
i'm not sure why my brain thought VZ when you said L3, but at least
they rhyme. Apolgies, folks.
matto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignat
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Randy Epstein wrote:
I would think that Elijah was looking slightly longer term than
pre-acquisition. Based on when Level(3) made the acquisition announcement,
I'd guess that they are fairly close to completing it, and if you've noticed
the changes at some of their other r
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
If this is all we have to talk about and it is on-topic, then NANOG has
failed, and we need a new list where people can actually discuss network
operations.
Who is stopping you? Either to raise subjects
guys, seriously, stop feeding the troll.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marshall McLuhan
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Sam Stickland wrote:
We work with a couple of different technologies here - our own GSS's, cache
farms and also external CDNs (for overflow). This is currently and area that
is currently under evaluation for a quite significant expansion.
Are you able to give some kind of d
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Would you mind giving us a little more to go on than "the love of
god" before making strategic architectural decisions?
Just in case we like to decide things for ourselves. :)
Patrick, I am sorry if I have hit a nerve with you- it seems you've
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Paul Vixie wrote:
I'm soliciting recommendations for DNS based load balancers.
my recommendation is: "don't do it." for background, see:
http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2002/msg02168.html
http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg03572.html
"chuck goolsbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway, if somebody could enlighten me to definitive proof, or stated
policy by Goo... er "search engines", that confirms this "search engine
result optimization by blatant abuse of IP addresses" I'd appreciate it. I
for one believe it is bunk dreamt
As a hoster with many customers on large shared VLANs perhaps I can add a
bit...
"Richard A Steenbergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simple: Subnets are hard, customers are stupid, and ARIN is not exactly a
hosters best friend.
When a hosting customer asks for 5 IPs today and 25 IPs tomorrow,
t fully documented in the notes (though very much
appreciated!). The idea was a content provider (say YouTube) and a
non-bell broadband provider (say Covad) would both interconnect on the
$10/meg carrier.
--
Matt Peterson
38B4 B706 3BA7 97B7 F638 1198 6AB4 CDF2 552A 0DC9
--
"Gunther Stammwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have customers who are complaining about packet loss and they are
providing me with MTRs and pathpings (that's some sort of traceroute that
pings every hop it sees several times - comes with windows xp) that show
the
loss starting at my routers a
On Fri, 12 May 2006, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
What are they talking about? .XXX already exists:
%dig ns xxx @g.public-root.com
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
xxx. 172800 IN NS eugene.kashpureff.org.
omg that is is super internet lols. seriously, best ns evar.
thx for the giggles.
[EMAIL PR
accurately determine that, we wouldnt be having
this discussion.
The irony here of course, is that Matt Black's systems can't even
tell if they want the mail until _after_ the accept it- but that's a
feature, and AOL's in-transaction softfails are evil. Or something.
matto
[EMAIL
Don't barrage them with bogus joejob bounce notifications?
IIRC that is a feature of your mail configuration down there.
matto
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Matthew Black wrote:
We've noticed a surge in 421 e-mail errors from AOL.
Message soft bounced for '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '4.3.2 - Not accepting me
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Mike Flanagan wrote:
If anyone has any recommendations for different tools for operations,
configuration management, capacity management and trending .. etc. Preferably
vendor neutral tools that can work across different router vendor platforms.
randy bush
[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matt Ghali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ someone else wrote, but Miquel failed to attribute: ]
.or do you think that TCP/IP connection
should be held open until the message can be scanned
Hi Matt-
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Matthew Black wrote:
Are you suggesting that we configure our e-mail servers to notify
people upon automatic deletion of spam?
Absolutely not. I was responding to the suggestion that it's a good
idea to silently drop mail which you have accepted with
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Simon Lyall wrote:
Everyone here runs spam filters. Many times a day you tell a remote MTA
you've accepted their email but you delete it instead. Explain the
difference?
Hold on there. What you are describing is evil and bad, and I
certainly hope "everyone" does not do t
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Kevin Day wrote:
I think the lesson here is that any service you make available to the public
(NTP, DNS, IRC, SMTP, whatever) is going to be used in ways that do not match
with your desires. If you're not willing to ACL/police the service, you're
going to have to accept th
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Eric Pancer wrote:
Damn, I was dreaming! You just had to wake me up...grr
Oh Ambien, sweet Ambien, where art thou?
You probably left it in the fridge, while you were making those
deep-fried twinkies in your sleep. Mmm, sleep twinkies
Seriously though, to the OP
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Frank Bulk wrote:
Yes, there are quite a few MPEG4-capable STB vendors with lots of middleware
vendors standing behind them, but I challenge you to document one
STB/middleware combination in GA. I haven't seen it. Talk to me in six
months, and it will be a different story.
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
Okay, if you insist we talk of exploits here, I take back the "talk after
the first worm".
So you really are admitting that you were simply spreading more
self-aggrandizing FUD?
You may not stick to your promises, but at least you are honest
about wh
Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Please provide reference URLs or the code, if not then stop spreading FUD.
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
No.
Talk to you after the first worm.
OK. We're holding you to your word there, Gadi.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
Moral indignation is a technique t
notice to anyone who may have to update
processes that parse this output.
A sample of the revised output is included at the end of this message.
Matt
--
Matt Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
VeriSign Information Services
[Sample output follows.]
Whois Server Version 2.0
Domain names in the .c
I'm looking for a firewall that has a very high packet throughput rate,
can handle minimal stun tasks, do server load balancing for http etc.,
handle many-to-one as well as bi-directional NAT and just plain works
with high reliability/redundancy.
Suggestions off list would be wonderful.
Tha
From: "Martin Hannigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As well, pvlans are prone to fail if not a forethought of architecture
instead of
an after effect. Trying to put legacy networks into a pvlan architecture
is like
putting square pegs in round holes.
My experience has been pvlans cause more trouble t
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Bill Nash wrote:
You will not learn hatred until that MMO you host implements a 'Report network
problem' button that does a traceroute, and automatically emails it and a
canned message to your NOC mailbox. Ultima Online did this, back in my nocling
days. Like monkeys expe
I need to find a few options for switches..
My requirements are based on heavy voip traffic so the switch needs to
support a very high pps rate while not as much in the Gbps realms -
we're using small codecs. We are looking at supporting > 1M subscribers.
Initially, we will be handling media bu
AFAIK there is no deployed, or even working shim6 code.
As such, it is not an operational issue by any stretch of the
imagination.
There are a number of more apropriate mailing lists for discussion
of issues surrounding the design and operation of shim6.
Coincidentally, I am not subscribed
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Gadi Evron wrote:
The list is not open to the public, and subscription requires vetting.
Please contact me or Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> directly to be added to the
group.
Translation: for 99% of the people who wasted time reading this, it
was simply masturbation.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, [iso-8859-1] Andrew Dul wrote:
So isn't this yet another reason why we need a rational PI policy,
so organizations don't have make up reasons why they are LIRs.
I'm left wondering why the federal government doesnt simply create a
single LIR for all fed agency assignments
I'd like to get opinions from people using XO's voip services as well as
opinions on any customer service they received for whatever service
they had from XO.. offlist replies would probably be best for all.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Chris Owen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Matt Ghali wrote:
Whoa. What ever happened to Karl Denninger anyway?
http://genesis3.blogspot.com/
Now I really wish I hadn't asked.
matto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
The only thing necessary for the
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
And in all my years running news, I never came cross fleming or
williams so I wouldn't know. Someone called me and made a Denniger
and an Auerbach reference.
Whoa. What ever happened to Karl Denninger anyway?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
The on
"Daniel Golding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ConEd Communications was recently acquired by RCN. I'm not sure if the
transaction has formally closed. I suspect there are serious transition
issues occurring. "Financial Stability", "Employee Churn", and "Ownership"
are, unfortunately, tough things t
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
that was my thought... and yes, it could get ugly for tcp services. Why
would you knowningly induce this complication?
When you want single flows to go faster than a single member link? (not that
I am saying this is a good idea)
Actually, T
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, (nanog) Brian Battle wrote:
I wish there was a system that let you do the following:
* Store and encrypt logins/passwords and access logs in a database
* Assign permissions (add new logins/passwords, change password...)
to those passwords on a per user/group basis, based
orth of bandwidth and maybe 20% of the
second.
Seems like they're bonded perhaps using destination IP? It's a vendor
managed solution and I need to get some answers faster than they're
coming in. Thanks.
Matt
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
The first and second paragraphs are sane. The last paragraph gives Go
Daddy the right to capriciously and arbitrarily delete your domain for
any reason they wish ("Morally objectionable activities will include,
but not be limited to...")
Do you b
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Jim Popovitch wrote:
[jim, please wrap your text!]
I have never been a Go Daddy customer, but I certainly appreciate
their stand on this issue. I will probably never be a Nectartech
customer after this episode.
Hear Hear.
After reading the GoDaddy domain registration l
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
FYI, Nectartech is a small hosting shop out of 55 S Market in San Jose. I
wouldn't describe them as a "datacenter", since I don't think they own or
operate any facilities.
Heh, I used to work at a small hosting shop out of 55 S. Market- it
wa
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Elijah Savage wrote:
Any validatity to this and if so I am suprised that our team has
got no calls on not be able to get to certain websites.
http://webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=477562
I for one applaud godaddy's response. If more piddling "Hosting
Provi
itelist around some problem systems in
your implementation but can you expect Grandma to do that?
Matt.
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
out there that keys off the return path. And there are a lot of
these systems.
Matt.
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Micheal Patterson wrote:
They may not a choice if those that are being hammered with their
auto-generated DSN's deem it unusually high traffic rate and
simply black list the domains using these devices. AOL.com comes
to mind and a few others in the recent weeks that
http://www.upsite.com/TUIpages/whitepapers/tuitiers.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:15 PM
> To: Matt Bazan
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bay area data center recommendation
Looking for recs on bay area California data centers (within 45 minutes
of San Francisco). Need a class IV facility. Off list is fine.
Thanks,
Matt
Can you expand a bit on how it dealt with the Level3 meltdown last
month?
In general, it doesn't do anything (much) for this sort of thing. It does
have a "blackhole detection" feature, but keep in mind how this thing works.
You set a prefix length (which must be equal or more specific than
We're looking at possibly purchasing a Internap FCP500,
everything I hear about these boxes is good. We are simultaneously
I have no experience with OER, but I have had a FCP5000 for a while now. We
have numerous transit links, all of which have significantly more burst
capacity than we act
ss Dolt
UltraDNS
I get the feeling a lot of folks have a vastly different opinion of
your employer, as well. Thanks for the assistance!
matt ghali
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
The only thing necessary for the triumph
of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
(152.63.21.245) [AS 701] 36 msec 40
msec 36 msec
9 0.so-0-2-0.AR1.BOS24.ALTER.NET (152.63.3.14) [AS 701] 36 msec 40 msec
36 msec
10 * * *
My BGP session to cymru has been down 5hs33min
~
Matt Taber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WMIS Internet http
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Gary Hale wrote:
Hmmm ... I suppose I would prefer this community not be made an
explicit source of information for a reporter. Implicitly, if
reporters must hang off this thread, they should be able to
discern impact from perspective given here. However, if questi
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
the internet model is to expect and route around failure.
randy
That precludes agreement on a definition of "failure". In recent
weeks we have once again learned that a large fuzzy fringe around
any sort of 100% consensus makes life interesting.
F
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Michael Painter wrote:
I'd be very interested in what folks here think of this:
http://news.com.com/Time+for+a+real+Internet+highway/2010-1028_3-5894664.html?tag=carsl
I think it's a news.com.com.com URL, and therefore most likely not
very worth opening, much less re
sfers configured? Perhaps you could contact UltraDNS
support and let them know which key they are using.
thanks, and sorry for the rant.
Matt Ghali
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<
The only thing necessary for the triumph
of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Bill Woodcock wrote:
...whereas post-redelegation, .iq is administered by the Iraqi
communications ministry from Bhagdad, rather than by Palestinians from
Texas. Seems like a clear improvement to me.
-Bill
That's great. So now {
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Peter Dambier wrote:
How about this one:
http://www.cynikal.net/~baptista/P-R/
Seems to be growing more files every day.
Kind regards,
Peter and Karin
Oh. Joe Baptista. Theres a name that adds an aura of legitimacy to
your organization. BTW, could you explain t
come of opening this process up,
I understand your concerns. My interest lies in the much smaller sub $100K
quotes that are not bound by NDAs.
4) If, as others have suggested, you don't like the sytem, then don't use it.
If enough people feel this will it will soon whither into the ether.
Matt
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Am I the only one who feels that an NDA, even an NDA with a vendor, is an
agreement that should be honored ?
I agree as well. It amuses me to no end that this fellow is posting
from his work account at "onelegal.com".
matto
[EMAIL PROTE
cross.
Frankly, I've been rather surprised at the level of the negativity that
has come across towards this idea in several of the posts and I'm not
sure why that is.
In either case, your last paragraph, Bill, was the direction I was
headed. I'll mull it over for a time then decide if I want to put
something in place and see what kind of response there is out there.
Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Ghali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> And I am risking my career for you because...?
>
For life and liberty and...well, ok. I'm only requesting people to
provide this info if they're comfortable doing so. If not, sit back a
1 - 100 of 290 matches
Mail list logo
