On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:51:28AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
The solution is not intuitive at all. The implications of cherry-picking
YANG statements from various revisions of a YANG module
On 2015-05-21 19:46, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Per Hedeland p...@tail-f.com wrote:
On 2015-05-21 19:14, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
RFC 6020 also states that must and when expessions are XPath 1.0, and
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Per Hedeland p...@tail-f.com wrote:
On 2015-05-21 19:14, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
RFC 6020 also states that must and when expessions are XPath 1.0, and we
are moving away from it. This is IMO a
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Andy,
I don't think the implementation burden on the server is that heavy.
A YANG 1.0 compliant server today supports:
leaf a in module A of type foo from foo@2001-01-01
leaf b in module B of type foo from
On 21 May 2015, at 16:50, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 21 May 2015, at 16:42, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
RFC 6020 also states that must and when expessions are XPath 1.0, and
we are
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Kent Watsen kwat...@juniper.net writes:
You seem to be suggesting that Kent is an uninformed observer and Y45-04
is actually really easy to understand. Neither is true.
I appreciate Andy's vote of confidence, but the
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 21 May 2015, at 16:21, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Kent Watsen kwat...@juniper.net writes:
You seem to be suggesting that Kent is an
