I am confused. I think there was some consensus to
- include all tree related guidelines in the tree document, remove all tree
related guidelines from 6087bis and have 6087bis point to the tree document
(which it already does)
The rest is pointless since AFAIK there is no wiki guidelines page
Lou,
right now, the document says standards track, Martin's proposal was to
move to informational. So how do I parse "I think you are correct. We
should leave as is."?
/js
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:36:58AM +0800, Lou Berger wrote:
> Martin,
> I think you are correct. We should leave as
On 11/15/17 05:38, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 05:27 -0500, Joe Clarke wrote:
>> On 11/15/17 05:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
I suppose my gut reaction to Lou's question as to whether a server
should support multiple versions was, "no." A client may have multiple
ver
I wanted to drop a note to the list in support of adoption for
draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext. I had a strong need for this in the
recent past in order to create a model for a complex data structure, and
I had to do some unnatural stuff to achieve my goal.
In my read through the document, the
Sounds perfect to me.
Mehmet
> -Original Message-
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net]
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 7:43 AM
> To: Mehmet Ersue ; 'Mahesh Jethanandani'
> ; 'Robert Wilton'
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] tree diagram guidelines
>
> To circle bac
To circle back to this. My sense of this discussion (as contributor) is
(a) the tree diagrams draft should be updated to point to a "guidelines"
wiki page for "the most current guidelines"
(b) the tree diagrams draft should be updated to include a full set of
the current tree related guidelines
Martin,
I think you are correct. We should leave as is.
I'm sure Kent/the document Shepherd makes sure whatever we do is right
before publication in any case.
Lou (as contributor)
On 11/15/2017 8:58 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has
Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
>
> On 16/11/2017 02:29, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The per-datastore feature aspect of NMDA is a new and significant
> > change to YANG.
> >
> >> | | +--ro feature* [name]
> >> | | | +--ro name yang:yang-identifier
> >> | | | +--ro