Martin,
        I think you are correct.  We should leave as is.

I'm sure Kent/the document Shepherd makes sure whatever we do is right before publication in any case.

Lou (as contributor)

On 11/15/2017 8:58 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,

Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status
Standards Track.  I think I heard during the meeting today that it
ought to be Informational.  I think this makes sense.  It would then
imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram
document as an informative reference.

Should we make this change?


/martin

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to