Lou, right now, the document says standards track, Martin's proposal was to move to informational. So how do I parse "I think you are correct. We should leave as is."?
/js On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:36:58AM +0800, Lou Berger wrote: > Martin, > I think you are correct. We should leave as is. > > I'm sure Kent/the document Shepherd makes sure whatever we do is right > before publication in any case. > > Lou (as contributor) > > On 11/15/2017 8:58 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status > > Standards Track. I think I heard during the meeting today that it > > ought to be Informational. I think this makes sense. It would then > > imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram > > document as an informative reference. > > > > Should we make this change? > > > > > > /martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
