On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 06:35:00 -0700, David E. Fox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:28:16 +0100
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In this respect 'deb', and 'rpm' are in my (inexpert) opinion
broadly
similar. What really matters is the quality of the *packager* (How
Thank
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 10:28:16 +0100
Derek Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this respect 'deb', and 'rpm' are in my (inexpert) opinion broadly
> similar. What really matters is the quality of the *packager* (How
I couldn't have said it better myself. That really is the crux of the
issue.
On Saturday 12 Jun 2004 05:36, David E. Fox wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 08:00:39 -0500
>
> The Other <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Suggestions for a package manager? The down side is that I have a
> > 56Kb Modem to use to get the updates.
>
> Well, a package manager per se is really a database f
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 08:00:39 -0500
The Other <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggestions for a package manager? The down side is that I have a
> 56Kb Modem to use to get the updates.
Well, a package manager per se is really a database front end, and the
database is either going to be what's in /va
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:36:21 +0800, wrote:
The Other wrote:
Suggestions for a package manager? The down side is that I have
a 56Kb
Modem to use to get the updates.
If its apt-get compared to plain jane rpm, there is no contest,
apt-get
wins hands down.
If it was between apt-get and urpmX then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David A. Ferguson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "The Other" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Given Tom's comment that removing old kernels is better done with a
package manager, I thought I'd ask for opinions on the best package
manager, and then I'
- Original Message -
From: "The Other" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Given Tom's comment that removing old kernels is better done with a
> package manager, I thought I'd ask for opinions on the best package
> manager, and then I'll build in that package manager.
I am new to Linux and mdk but it
