At 07:57 PM 6/26/2001, Paul wrote:
It was Tue, 26 Jun 2001 21:20:17 +0100 when bascule wrote:
They tried to port it to Win NT, but that failed. The amount of addresses was
too much for it.
Paul
That is embarrassing.
.::Wall$treet::.
Yes, FreeBSD does use different licenses. Most BSD licenses do. They run off
a BSD license and is much different then GPL.
Meanwhile, the fact that Micro$HAFT has to rely on a *nix machine period is a
victory for OpenSource period!
tdh
--
T. Holmes
-
UNIXTECHS.org
[EMAIL
It was Tue, 26 Jun 2001 21:20:17 +0100 when bascule wrote:
They tried to port it to Win NT, but that failed. The amount of addresses was
too much for it.
Paul
er, i don't wish to be pedantic but i believe that hotmail is using some
freebsd installations which i believe (could be misinformed)
Edward Barrow wrote:
It was also built and runs on Linux (MS are embarrassed by this and plan to migrate
it to W2K, I don't know if they've done so yet)
It will probably stop working when they do.
On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:31 PM, Jose [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hotmail was designed to be used from any browser. You can still go to
www.hotmail.com to read, answer, write and save your emails. While it is
easier to use Outlook Express, you can use any browser.
It was also built
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:24, Edward Barrow wrote:
On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:31 PM, Jose [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
Hotmail was designed to be used from any browser. You can still go
to www.hotmail.com to read, answer, write and save your emails.
While it is easier to use Outlook
