l ooDialog questions on those venues.
Really the oorexx-users mailing list would be good for anyone not
wishing to join RexxLA, but it is not widely used. Still, I watch it
and would quickly answer any ooDialog questions, if they were asked.
--
Mark Miesfeld
he
list as to a need to find a developer, or developers, with the time,
interest in, and level of skill, needed to do the task.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards fo
Jean-Louis,
I'm certainly in favor of a DocBook on how the internals of ooRexx work.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher
wrote:
> There is a skeleton "InternalClasses" in the wiki, currently empty.
> Is there other sites I'm
directory names have a triangle next to them.
Click on triangle to open, or close up, the individual directories.
Drill down to: oorexx -> 4.1.0.beta to see the current list of
packages available for the 4.1.0 beta.
--
Mark Miesfeld
nsus from the
developers, or the users, that this is something that *should* be
done. I have no objection to it, and would implement it, if I felt
it was something the users, or the developers, really wanted.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
l, and want to change the intended
behaviour, then that can be done.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint
uninstall program knows exactly what those settings
are, since those settings can (and do) change. The uninstall is
written as part of the install. It is at that point, and only at that
point, that you can be sure of what the installer is doing.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> On 06.11.2010 16:09, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
> send me the file as an attachment. Just send it to my g-mail account,
> or open a bug and attach the file to the bug.
>
> Unfortunately, that is not possible. One can mark
nish the install, with none of the check boxes checked, no
file association will be created and the editor setting is of course
not done. (Setting the editor requires at least one file
association.)
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
ctory itself), if that makes a difference.
Do you mean by this that you have run the uninstall / install
mulitiple times with the same results?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, David Ashley wrote:
> I'm ok with putting things on SF. I will start adding things after tonight's
> builds.
Good, that's the plan then.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Nokia
s going and put the builds on
SourceForge tonight. It's a beta after all and really things are at
least 99.9% ready.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
e.
> and certainly a final release before the Christmas holidays.
Definitely, barring any unforseen events.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create ne
1
NOT the test suite in trunk:
https://oorexx.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/oorexx/test/trunk
I think some people may be forgetting 4.1.0 is branched from the 4.0.1
release, not branched from trunk.
If you still get the errors using the 4.0.1 test suite, then let us know.
--
Mark Mi
own words. If
the english is a little off, I'll rephrase some things for you.
Really, getting the doc started is half the battle.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-
we start the beta without the doc and add a skeleton chapter
on it when someone has the time and / or inclination. It might even
be something you want to do Jean-Louis, you seem to have an interest
in xsl processing.
--
Mark Miesfeld
---
That sounds good David. I'm thinking Monday, or whenever after that
you have time. I'm hoping to have the last updates done by Sunday.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:17 AM, David Ashley
wrote:
> All -
>
> Just let me know when you are ready and I will produ
les. They are both started,
just need to be finished up. The ReadMe.pdf doc still needs some
work. I started that, will try to finish up over the weekend.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling
ase items pretty cleaned up. Every thing going in the 4.1.0
release is marked as 'pending' and 'next release.' If you do a filter
on those, you should see all the relevant items. Feel free to update
the CHANGES file. Anything you can
I like it better that way in the PDF, and in the html, I
like it a lot better.
So, I'm glad you went ahead and committed the changes.
--
Mark Miesfeld.
--
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators
Jean-Louis,
I just did a quick test, and I agree with David. I'm all for the
change. I'd never looked at the html docs before. It seems all the
tables look bad.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher
wrote:
>
>> * This bug: 3028787 O
looks to be a problem with jade
maybe. SlickEdit reports no end tag for colspec. The online Doc book
reference shows colspec like this:
in the xml we have:
But, if I add the / making it:
Then jade reporst an error. So, I'm guessing that's why things don't
work in the HTML ve
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:36 AM, David Ashley
wrote:
> The old scheme. There is some work to do to convert the docs which I don't
> want to tackle until after the 4.1.0 release.
Okay, that sounds the most reasonable.
--
Ma
Is this still using the old doc build process, or RenderX?
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:11 AM, David Ashley
wrote:
> All -
>
> This morning I build the first draft documentation for ooRexx 4.1.0. You can
> fin
> it here
>
> http://build.oorexx.org/buil
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:35 AM, David Ashley
> wrote:
>
>> After much frustration, I finally have a potential replacement for the DSSSL
...
>
> In addition, after I read the RenderX license, I was not convinced
&
ense, I was not convinced
that the license was geared to Open Source developers as Jean-Louis
thought. I think the licensing would need to be looked at closely.
But, I have no objection to moving to this if others think we should.
It's no secret that I don't like certain things about our cu
X 2.x
ln -sf %{_prefix}/lib/ooRexx/librexxapi.so.%{orx_libversion}
/usr/lib/librexxapi.so.2
--
Mark Miesfeld
>
> David Ashley
>
> On 10/19/2010 10:15 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>>
>>> 1.) The dlopen test fails under
plus anything in
ld.so.conf (rather than /lib and /usr/lib plus anything in ld.so.conf
which is what vanilla upstream libtool does).
Debian use /lib and /usr/lib on all architectures"
So I think on Debian 64-bit we should just put the libraries in /usr/lib/ooRexx.
--
Mar
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> 1.) The dlopen test fails under 4.1.0 from trunk and works with the
> released 4.0.1, on Fedora Core 13 64-bit
>
> 2.) Building the external binaries for the test suite fails under
> 4.1.0 from trunk and works with the relea
Hi David,
So, I was at a disadvantage in the earlier discussion because I didn't
have access to a Fedora system, and hadn't had a chance yet to test
thoroughly. Because of that I couldn't be sure of my facts.
But, now I've had a chance to look at this more closely, and the same
two problems I lis
e doing on Fedora, SuSE, etc.. Don't you?
I'll get that fixed up.
But the basic question is, should the installed files go in the same
place, /usr/lib/ooRexx etc.?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Download new Adobe(R) Fla
es. But apparently not.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications t
experience on Fedora leads me to suspect that it may not be
sufficient on other Linux distributions.
I'll fix the debian build, but that's why I started this conversation,
to see if symbolic links, or adding a file to /etc/ld.so.conf.d, was
the "corr
rrors: 0
Exceptions: 1
Skipped files: 0
Messages:0
Logs:1
Total time: 00:00:01.777142
:~/work/tools/wc/ooTest/4.x$
So, see, someone is testing your builds. They just are getting
different results than you are.
--
Mark Miesfeld
and see which
approach you were "supposed" to use. On my Kubuntu system, there is
only one file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d, so I was thinking that adding a
file to that directory was not used.
Creating symlinks is easy enough in the script and was what we did before.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-
g a Google search also seemed to point to the conclusion that
symbolic links needed to be created. I started with debian
documentation though, where the writers seem to be adverse to stating
things simply.
--
Mark Miesfeld
xtensions were set up. Now they can do whatever they want.
As to assigning a lot of different extensions to a ftype, well I'd
prefer to leave that up to the user.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Download new Adobe(R) Fla
tension?
That's a great comment. I rewrote the screens so that you only need
to enter the editor once.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(
h existing make files would need to redo
them.
You're the expert here, but don't the symbolic links still need to be
created in /usr/lib?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new
good. The build machine has the Linux builds on it already.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly
Flex(R) Builder(TM
for it is what you have done, putting it up on
a web page.
On a sort of contrary note, I'm not sure I'd bother with downloading a
rpm, I'd probably just download the zipped PDF docs.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> A completely un-related question.
>
> It seems to me in older installations, you could launch rexxtry from
> the command line on Linux. I just noticed in 4.1.0 you can't if you
> install from a deb package. Not sure
kage. Not sure what happens using a rpm
package, I only have access to a Kubuntu system at present.
Since you are now putting the executables in /usr/bin, I think you
should either put rexxtry there also, or link to it. Which ever is
appropriate.
-
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Yep, I see the problem. I forgot that the default value is that
> determined by the NOVALUE handler, which uses the provided name.
> Needed to tweak things a little.
Thanks.
--
Mark
David / Rick
In case you miss the svn message, I've branched the 4.1.0 docs from trunk.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMASc
ssertSame("FOOBAR.1", setStem.1)
and the METHOD.testGroup looks like:
self~TestSetObjectVariable('setStem.', .stem~new("FOOBAR."))
testGroup~assertSame("FOOBAR.", setStem.[])
testGroup~assertSame("FOOBAR.1", setStem.1)
--
Mark Miesfeld
done, it may be already
doc'd in trunk. Not sure though if there is some doc in trunk for
stuff that will not be in 4.1.0?
If we branch from trunk, it is easy enough for me to fix the ooDialog
doc. David if you feel like doing the branch, go for i
ld be
reported to the RexxLA webmaster.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> The download link from <http://www.oorexx.org/download.html> is broken,
> if choosing download Windows 3.2.0, which points to
> <http://sourcefo
David,
That sounds good.
As I recall, when you first posted the problem with the Windows, you
said that the build worked fine when you ran it manually. That you
only got the error when you ran it automated. Is that still the case?
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David Ashley
th if you installed into a directory with spaces in it.
You can also cross-compile, compile the 64-bit version in a 32-bit
Windows, etc.. But I usually have a 32-bit system right next to a
64-bit system so I never bothered to try it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-
All,
I placed Windows installation packages on the build machine:
http://build.oorexx.org/builds/interpreter-main/6209/windows/
There are 32-bit and 64-bit builds of 4.1.0 and 4.2.0, both debug and
non-debug versions.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Brandon Cherry wrote
kubuntu87.x86_64.deb
ooRexx-4.2.0-6212.ubuntu87.x86_64.deb
ooRexx-4.2.0-6212.kubuntu90.x86_64.deb
ooRexx-4.2.0-6212.ubuntu91.x86_64.deb
And have people asking us: I using Fedora 12 and there is no RPM for
me. What should I do? When any one of the rpms listed above will
work on Fedora 12.
--
Mark
and 64 bit build in the current build directory,
and then post which directory it was.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployme
weeks, but as always some
second eyes are sure to pick up things I don't see. In particular I
haven't yet tested much as a regular user on Vista or Windows 7.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Start uncovering the many ad
details on the problem I think David is referring to:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2991134&group_id=119701&atid=684730
4.0.1 rev. 5804, 5766 don't build with gcc 4.5-5.2
It is gcc 4.5-5.2 that is giving us problems.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-
if you do add them, I'll
fix it up.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
Linxu OSes, a lot, I've
installed rpm packages hundresds, probably thousands of time. I've
never once used: rpm --prefix=
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:59 AM, David Ashley
wrote:
> All -
>
> I have been looking at making some changes to the RPM spec file and I am n
xtensions/rxsock/streamsocket.cls ./
> cp: ./extensions/rxsock/streamsocket.cls: A file or directory in the
Those class files are not in 4.1.0. Same with cvsStream, that
extension is not in 4.1.0.
Maybe David didn't finish merging everything he meant to.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Sep 16, 201
k to branch the
docs from trunk, and I could just replace the ooDialog files in the
branch with the ones from 4.0.1.
Whatever any one else thinks, I'm fine with.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Start uncovering the many advanta
#x27;pending' and in the
'Next Release' group. Those bugs have been merged to the 4.1.0
branch.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Ent
27;t remember if it is the branch version I built this moring, or
the trunk version, I also built this morning.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
En
Rick and David,
Thanks for getting this started.
Can we also update the version numbers in trunk to be some number
higher than 4.1.0?
--
Mark Miesfeld
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:59 AM
Subject: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx:[6153] main
ngs (like the Aero wizard)
that are only available on Vista or later.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R)
e list. You have to be
explicity added, I think by David.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.
it up.
>
> As above, strange that one would need an additional privilege on an
> admin ID.
Again, it is because you are not really running as an admin, you are
running as a regular user.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This
y accident.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-
not have 3.2.0 run from the memory stick if you
already have another verison of ooRexx installed on the system. That
will never work.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote:
> Well, it wasn't so good for me :-( I copied my old (2007) ooRexx 3.2
> from
When I looked at the bug a couple of weeks ago, I had a hard time
trying to put a specific version of gcc on the debian-based system I
was on. Eventually I gave up. ;-( Maybe David with his better Linux
skills can
This looks to be exactly the bug already in tracker:
2991134 4.0.1 rev. 5804, 5766 don't build with gcc 4.5-5.2
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:49 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> I set up a new virtual machine last night (Open SUSE 11.3 i386) and tried to
> build ooRexx on it. The compile generates an erro
or one) new method you added to the DateTime
class.
If we included those and a couple of small enhancements from David, I
think it would make a good release.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> That would work too, although I think if there are new APIs included,
> then the version number should be 4.1.0, not 4.0.2.
Oh, yeah. I'm not set on a version number. 4.1.0 would be fine.
--
Mark Miesfeld
> Rick
>
>
rlorn, hope that enough
users would work with the beta ooDialog to give feedback on the new
classes and new methods before they were set in stone. And find
backwards compatibility issues, that could maybe be worked out.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
I can
probably do most of the work myself, so it is not much of a burden for
the other developers if they are too busy.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming s
This is the only other place in the code that is similar, in SysFile.cpp:
#if defined(__APPLE__) && defined(__MACH__)
so you should have copied that.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:06 AM, CVBruce wrote:
> I'll go check. To tell you the truth, I just copied i
lease and debug
builds in one file. You could name it anything and put it where ever
you want.
It should work fine. (Of course what you are currently doing *should*
also work fine.)
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2D
t to me. And, I've tried introducing
different errors to see if I could get the message you've gotten. No
luck.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming s
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:33 AM, David Ashley
> wrote:
>> This is very strange. I can perform builds by hand, just not with my build
>> script. It always chokes on the invocation of the makeorx.bat command. And
&g
rex.
I'll take a look at it. If you are redireting output from
orxbuildwin.rex, it might be that the second redirection in
makeorx.bat is not ... something. Not valid, no longer has a stdout
handle ...
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
ing
to write a batch file and have some error in the syntax.
I think you are using Rexx scripts for most everything, so I suspect
you have an error in something you are passing out to the OS.
I would check where you are using the redirection &g
it would be great if it was
something that could interest Rick. I'd like to see it done with his
guidance.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, David Ashley
wrote:
> I am still Having problems checking out the ooRexx source code from the SVN
> repository even after installing a new version of Slik Subversion. Does anyone
> have any suggestions?
Can you show us the last few lines of the check out so we c
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> Just wondering, whether the build-machine is already up and reachable or
> not yet ready (getting timeouts trying to use it from over here).
It's not up.
--
Ma
a USB stick was really what I had in mind, it was just simpler
to do a quick demo with a zip file.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative c
ally halts it by some means, task manager, pskill, killer,
etc..)
On Windows, rxapi is best installed as a service. For Windows Vista
(and I assume for Windows 7) there are a number of problems caused by
UAC that can be avoided if rxapi is started as a service instead of as
a regular process.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Walter Pachl wrote:
>
>> Sitting at my office computer w/o Admin rights I dearly miss ooRexx.
>> Is it possible to use it as portable app without installing it?
>> Would be
set your individual
path, which is appended to the system path for everything you do.
rxapi will start automatically when you run a Rexx program and will
keep running until you log off. It will just run as a regular process
rather than as a service. Which is jus
It looks like that machine doesn't have the debhelper package installed.
sudo apt-get install debhelper
Should do it, if not try a Google search for debhelper install
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> while creating a 32-
me a bit to figure out the problem because the message is not that
intuitive as to what the real problem is.
Could it be that ethernet connection is not stable in the virtual machine?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net email
m:
; This script requires 2 plugins added to your NISI installation. They need to
; be put into ${NSISDIR}\Plugins directory:
; services.dll -> http://nsis.sourceforge.net/File:Services.zip
; ooRexxProcess.dll ->
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/ under oorexx-bui
script. You can locate it by
looking for the line starting with: %post
The post script is kept up to date and the rpm install is undeniably
the best tested of all the Unixes.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net email is sponso
have trunk checked out, and want to be sure you have a
good build, the first step(s) should be:
# cd main
# make maintainer-clean
# svn update
# ./bootstrap
# ...
I just redid the build using the steps directly above, worked fine,
took less than 4 minutes.
--
Mark Miesfeld
---
se branches will have oorexx.ver updated for
sure. (Manually by David.)
Often, when we first branch from trunk, the manual update in trunk
isn't done right away, but David usually does the manual update pretty
soon after we branch. A couple of weeks or a month.
2
# For ooRexx, this number should ALWAYS be zero. This will force the linker to
# utilize all previous releases for linking.
ORX_AGE=0
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't liv
<- builds killer
nMake /F Makefile.win ooRexxProcess_Plugin <- builds ooRexxProcess.dll
ooRexxProcess.dll is not in the 'all' build because it requires NSIS
to be installed.
--
Mark Miesfeld
build machine
working well and you could easily pick up a pre-built deb package with
all the latest fixes.
I would try putting all the required files in the same diretory you
are executing your script from, just to see what happens.
Of course, you may have already tried these things.
--
Mark
Are you sure it works on 32 bit?
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> while working on the 64-Bit-Ubuntu-Linux platform, I have been hit with the
> following error from ooRexx:
>
> o...@ronylinux:/opt/BSF4ooRexx/inst
state, and the resolution indicates that they are not just
discarded.
I'll do that tomorrow unless there are more objections.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live wi
too poor.
What were you comments here, or do I really not remember correctly?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Jean-Louis Faucher
> wrote:
>
>> Some weeks ago, I fixed two crashes I had in my sandbox, and maybe those
>> fixes are candidate to go in trunk...
>> Let me know...
>>
. (I'll have to look it up, I forget right now.)
Of course, I'll have to look it up anyway. I'm *pretty* sure I it
doesn't have the bug.
--
Mark Miesfeld
>
>
> Jean Louis
>
>
> ---
701 - 800 of 1904 matches
Mail list logo
