Thanks Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
> > Can you remind me what target you are using and how many sessions you
> > should have?
The m500i have got two portals, so two session are started of for each
portal.
tcp: [1] 192.168.43.6:3260,2 iqn.
1994-12.com.promise.target.a9.39.4.55.1.0.0.20
tcp: [2] 192.168.43.5:3260,1 iqn.
1994-12.com
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:44:02PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> swejis wrote:
> > OK, new logfile found here: http://www.wehay.com/messages.new.gz
> >
>
> Can you remind me what target you are using and how many sessions you
> should have? It looks like only one session has problems. The ot
swejis wrote:
> OK, new logfile found here: http://www.wehay.com/messages.new.gz
>
Can you remind me what target you are using and how many sessions you
should have? It looks like only one session has problems. The other/s
look like they are just fine. Are the errors now (before I understood
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:17:17PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hello list!
> >
> > Unfortunately I had to upgrade a server running CentOS 4.6 (sfnet
> > initiator)
> > to CentOS 5.1 (open-iscsi initiator) and now I have some problems with it
>
> You are using th
Matt Herzog wrote:
> Has anyone set up a FreeBSD 7 initiator to mount a Solaris 10 target?
> I spent the better part of a day trying to "make it go" and failed.
>
> I just want to know if anyone on this list has succeeded.
>
I think you are on the wrong list. open-iscsi has not worked on bsd f
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> Unfortunately I had to upgrade a server running CentOS 4.6 (sfnet initiator)
> to CentOS 5.1 (open-iscsi initiator) and now I have some problems with it
You are using the open-iscsi code that comes with Centos right?
> (then again I was expecting it.. I
jergendutch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have iscsi setup on some boxes. They can all mount a central target
> in succession but not at the same time. This is fine, I have installed
> GFS to make this work.
>
> I read somewhere (and this is where I need the help) that open-iscsi
> limits the number of
Padmanabhan wrote:
> Hello,
> I have already installed 2.0.865 and want to install the latest
> release 2.0.869.
>
> Which files should I remove from the previous installation ?
>
You should not need to remove any files. Everything should be backward
compatible. You might want to use the new i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As the title says, I get this error when I try to find iscsi targets.
> I cannot for the life of me get open-iscsi to work and always get this
> error. I am trying to connect to a working sanfly iscsi target from
> either RHEL 5.1 client or the latest ubuntu.
>
What t
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:10:08PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Basicly those "Nop-out timedout" errors keep showing up all the time when
> > > there is IO going on.. and if I have "dd if=/dev/mpath of=/dev/null"
> > > running
> >
> > You can expand the timeout to a higher valu
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:56:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Has anyone experienced this error? I have no firewall, no SELinux
> running, etc. The iSCSI target should be fine as windows clients were
> able to utilize the sanfly targets before (or ones like it).
Well, the error is jus
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:15:36PM -0300, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
>
> Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> > So, the obvious question here: I want to store the data in the SAN.
> > Should I get my sessions running in the host, or inside each virtual
> > machine?
> If this is not the corr
Regarding MujZeptu's post on the unexpected opcode, we have identified an
issue with sanFly when using open-iscsi in discovery sessions. This was not
seen in testing with other iSCSI initiators. A patch for sanFly will be
released once tested in-house.
Steve Marfisi
emBoot Inc.
--~--~-~
Has anyone experienced this error? I have no firewall, no SELinux
running, etc. The iSCSI target should be fine as windows clients were
able to utilize the sanfly targets before (or ones like it).
Is there a howto or directions I can follow? Can I not do a discovery
and just connect to it dire
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> So, the obvious question here: I want to store the data in the SAN.
> Should I get my sessions running in the host, or inside each virtual
> machine?
If this is not the correct group to ask this question, I'd gladly accept
suggestions for other groups! :)
--
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:16:40AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:34:37PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > Hello list!
> >
> > Unfortunately I had to upgrade a server running CentOS 4.6 (sfnet
> > initiator)
> > to CentOS 5.1 (open-iscsi initiator) and now
Has anyone set up a FreeBSD 7 initiator to mount a Solaris 10 target?
I spent the better part of a day trying to "make it go" and failed.
I just want to know if anyone on this list has succeeded.
--
"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too
dark to read."
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:23:32AM -0700, jergendutch wrote:
>
> On 28 Mai, 16:13, Konrad Rzeszutek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:32:03AM -0700, jergendutch wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > I have iscsi setup on some boxes. They can all mount a central target
> > > in
On 28 Mai, 16:13, Konrad Rzeszutek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:32:03AM -0700, jergendutch wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I have iscsi setup on some boxes. They can all mount a central target
> > in succession but not at the same time. This is fine, I have installed
> > GFS t
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 03:34:37PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> Hello list!
>
> Unfortunately I had to upgrade a server running CentOS 4.6 (sfnet initiator)
> to CentOS 5.1 (open-iscsi initiator) and now I have some problems with it
> (then again I was expecting it.. I hate this Promise ar
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 05:32:03AM -0700, jergendutch wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have iscsi setup on some boxes. They can all mount a central target
> in succession but not at the same time. This is fine, I have installed
> GFS to make this work.
>
> I read somewhere (and this is where I need the
Hello list!
Unfortunately I had to upgrade a server running CentOS 4.6 (sfnet initiator)
to CentOS 5.1 (open-iscsi initiator) and now I have some problems with it
(then again I was expecting it.. I hate this Promise array).
/var/log/messages:
May 28 15:14:16 server1 multipathd: path checkers s
Hello,
I have iscsi setup on some boxes. They can all mount a central target
in succession but not at the same time. This is fine, I have installed
GFS to make this work.
I read somewhere (and this is where I need the help) that open-iscsi
limits the number of connections per lun to one, and I n
OK, new logfile found here: http://www.wehay.com/messages.new.gz
TIA
// Jonas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
To un
Hi all,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Michael Chan wrote:
>> If we change the implementation to use a separate IP address and
>> separate MAC address for iSCSI, will it be acceptable? The iSCSI IP/MAC
>> addresses will be unknown to the Linux TCP stack and so no sharing of
>> the 4-tuple space will be ne
26 matches
Mail list logo
