Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
> > I feel a partnership between a couple of IT savyy clinicians and expert
> > programmers with a wholesome way of looking at things, can create the
> > infrastructure of the future HISs.
>
> Nandalal, you have in one sentence described how VistA was first
> developed and
Greg Woodhouse wrote:
> Fair enough. I suspect that the problem you describe here may be a bit
> of a red herring, though. The problem is not so much IT people (and I
> think that is a problematic term, at best) thinking they have the
it is, was trying to be non-offensive; should have just said "
Bhaskar wrote:
> Commercial and licensed under the GPL (or the broader category of
> FOSS software) are orthogonal attributes, and there are packages
> that fall into all four combinations of those attributes. So, in
> this case, to be completely precise, it was not Cache (commercial)
> vs. GT.M
On Thursday 26 January 2006 03:56 pm, Bhaskar, KS wrote:
> FOIAVistA SemiVivA 20060113 is now available...
How does this compare with VistA-Office?
-- Rod
www.sunsetsystems.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/
<*> T
FOIAVistA SemiVivA 20060113 is now available and can be downloaded from
Source Forge (http://sourceforge.net/projects/worldvista). A SemiVivA
package is an installation of VistA that is bundled with GT.M and ready
for use if you alreay have a PC running Linux.
Assuming that the distribution file
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 16:02 -0600, Greg Woodhouse wrote:
> --- "Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One of the myths that is part of the FUD spread by vendors whose
> business models are not based on open source licenses is that
> software
> based on open source licenses is not commercia
--- "Bhaskar, KS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the myths that is part of the FUD spread by vendors whose
business models are not based on open source licenses is that software
based on open source licenses is not commercial. Please do not
inadvertently help spread this myth.
Thank you for y
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 14:37 -0600, Greg Woodhouse wrote:
[KSB] <...snip...>
> runs on a commercial OS. With regard to platforms: VistA runs under
> InterSystems Cache' (a commercial M implementation) and GT.M (an open
> source M implementation). Historically, it has run under DSM, OpenM,
[KSB
--- Nandalal Gunaratne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[NG]
One problem in people not learning from VistA is that it is so
difficult to install and run!
[GW]
The trouble is that VistA was developed over a period of approximately
30 years during which it was
Hi Nandalal,
There was nothing personal in my message. I just wanted to point out
that time is probably come for "out of the box thinking".
You are probably aware that current standards in the medical domain are
all dedicated to "report making". It means that nothing exists to give a
proper vis
Phillipe,
I would like to know your approach to things, more clearly. The list I made is
more in fun than an initiative for OSHCA!! My interest infact is in the use of
IT for the area of Research, audit and CME for clinicians. The BIG jobof making
those for administrators, managers, ministers
Greg Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One problem in people not learning from VistA is that it is so difficult to
install and run! The other point is that the various modules have different
licences. It is not fully open sourced in that sense (or am I wrong?).
Some of the largest modu
Joseph Dal Molin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel a partnership between
a couple of IT savyy clinicians and expert
> programmers with a wholesome way of looking at things, can create the
> infrastructure of the future HISs.
Nandalal, you have in one sentence described how VistA wa
13 matches
Mail list logo