Fixed in commit:
http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=e5676b8328a486565fc3c7f408a40beb4d47cd08
Matt
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:23:51PM -0400, John Foley wrote:
> I'm trying to get that information from the IronPort team. In the mean
> time, this bug report appears to have some details:
>
> https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo25329
Sadly, this requires a login. The bug is however refere
I'm trying to get that information from the IronPort team. In the mean
time, this bug report appears to have some details:
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo25329
On 05/01/2014 12:26 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:08:50PM -0400, John Foley wrote:
>
>> This is a
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:08:50PM -0400, John Foley wrote:
> This is a known problem in the Ironport TLS stack. Ironport has
> released a hot patch to address this problem.
Any links to the fix?
I'd like to post a link to the fix to the Postfix and Exim users
lists, so that if anyone runs into
This is a known problem in the Ironport TLS stack. Ironport has
released a hot patch to address this problem.
On 05/01/2014 06:29 AM, Marcus Meissner via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SUSE has received a bugreport from a user, that the "padding" extension
> change breaks IronPort SMTP appliances.
>
> Ther
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:26:48PM +0200, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> > Workaround: Force protocol to SSLv3 or recompile without the define
> > above.
If there were an SSL_OP_ flag to allow applications to disable
padding, that would be useful for SMTP applications. There is
precious little p
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2014 14:29:44 +0200
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:35:19PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe this should teach us a lesson: Adding more and more
> > > Workarounds for broken stuff isn't th
On Thu, 1 May 2014 14:29:44 +0200
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:35:19PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> >
> > Maybe this should teach us a lesson: Adding more and more
> > Workarounds for broken stuff isn't the way to go forward. The way
> > to go forward is to fix broken stuff.
>
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:35:19PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
>
> Maybe this should teach us a lesson: Adding more and more Workarounds
> for broken stuff isn't the way to go forward. The way to go forward is
> to fix broken stuff.
The problem isn't always to fix the broken stuff but ussually to ge
On Thu, 1 May 2014 13:26:48 +0200
"Stephen Henson via RT" wrote:
> Ironically it was added as a workaround for another bug. The padding
> extension was believed to have no side effects... obviously that
> isn't true :-(
Maybe this should teach us a lesson: Adding more and more Workarounds
for br
On Thu May 01 12:29:58 2014, meiss...@suse.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SUSE has received a bugreport from a user, that the "padding"
> extension
> change breaks IronPort SMTP appliances.
>
> There might a RT on this already, not sure.
>
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875639
> http://postfix.
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:29:58PM +0200, Marcus Meissner via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SUSE has received a bugreport from a user, that the "padding" extension
> change breaks IronPort SMTP appliances.
>
> There might a RT on this already, not sure.
>
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8756
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:29:26PM +0200, John-Mark Gurney via RT wrote:
> diff --git a/apps/speed.c b/apps/speed.c
> index 9232418..f70fd3e 100644
> --- a/apps/speed.c
> +++ b/apps/speed.c
> @@ -1126,9 +1126,7 @@ int MAIN(int argc, char **argv)
>
> BIO_printf(bio_err,"\n");
Hi,
SUSE has received a bugreport from a user, that the "padding" extension
change breaks IronPort SMTP appliances.
There might a RT on this already, not sure.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875639
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/OpenSSL-1-0-1g-and-Ironport-SMTP-appliances-inte
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 05:42:16PM +0200, noloa...@gmail.com via RT wrote:
> A question using PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC was recently asked on Stack
> Overflow. Currently, there is no documentation on the function.
>
> The PKCS5_PBKDF2_HMAC.pod is new. It is based on the documentation for
> EVP_BytesToKey.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:52:32PM +0200, Maria Moskaleva via RT wrote:
> Hello! "Make" fails, wihle I'm trying build the openssl library.
> http://screeny.ru/534bd10369000fff1f0225ce
> Why have I problem with md2test.c? (m2test.c:1: parse error before '.'
> token)
> What should I do? Thanks in adv
16 matches
Mail list logo
