On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed strings in tests (unit tests or others) have translation marks
> > (_, _LE and so on).
> > Do we need translation marks for them?
> >
> > I don't think so for most cases from various reasons
Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 10/1/2016 5:49 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
No you shouldn't need to mark strings for translation in test code. I
believe we have a hacking rule for marking LOG.info/warning/error
messages for translation but it should skip test directories.
Ah I guess the hacking rule
On 10/1/2016 5:49 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
No you shouldn't need to mark strings for translation in test code. I
believe we have a hacking rule for marking LOG.info/warning/error
messages for translation but it should skip test directories.
Ah I guess the hacking rule is nova-specific:
http
On 10/1/2016 9:48 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi,
I noticed strings in tests (unit tests or others) have translation marks
(_, _LE and so on).
Do we need translation marks for them?
I don't think so for most cases from various reasons below.
Only exception is to test translations.
From translato
Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi,
I noticed strings in tests (unit tests or others) have translation marks
(_, _LE and so on).
Do we need translation marks for them?
I don't think so for most cases from various reasons below.
Only exception is to test translations.
From translators:
- Effort to t
Hi,
I noticed strings in tests (unit tests or others) have translation marks
(_, _LE and so on).
Do we need translation marks for them?
I don't think so for most cases from various reasons below.
Only exception is to test translations.
>From translators:
- Effort to translate strings in tests le
