https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
Dan Allen dal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dal...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851803
Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|mingw-gmp |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622
Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||mingw-gmp
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #25 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi,
you must set this variable with -g option
-g, --gradle-user-home Specifies the gradle user home directory.
$ gradle --help
USAGE: gradle [option...] [task...]
-?, -h, --help
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850949
--- Comment #9 from Floren Munteanu ad...@yqed.com ---
Just curious, how long does it takes to review a package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851802
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851804
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851805
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851806
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851808
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851809
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950
--- Comment #26 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-3/gradle.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/gradle/release/1.0-3/gradle-1.0-3.fc16.src.rpm(In
reply to comment #24)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851811
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851812
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851813
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851814
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851816
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851818
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851818
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851816
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851814
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851813
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851812
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851811
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851809
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851808
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851806
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851805
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851804
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851802
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851800
--- Comment #1 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
This is a re-review of a retired package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851641
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dyroff b...@dyroff.org ---
I fixed some of the issues, see
http://git.dyroff.org/?p=sdyroff-rpms.git;a=blob;f=SPECS/lprof.spec;h=e1bf7866f1ce2b1ed5ec5ec3636176c8183d095f;hb=0930c823297262b45a85c35a75141d29bb88455b
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|Security|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851701
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851848
Bug ID: 851848
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835015
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Ping...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
In the %build phase you're adding -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to the CFLAGS. Is this
really needed for MinGW builds? IIRC this is a Linux-specific hack.
rpmlint also gives some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
--- Comment #10 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com ---
Sure, will make those changes before importing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830418
Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
The native Fedora xz package got updated to version 5.1.2alpha some weeks ago.
You might want to update to that version as well
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845673
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840244
pcpa paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735554
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735554
--- Comment #6 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to ---
It does look like I should add an empty %build section though based on the
rpmlint message. (I don't remember seeing that detailed of a message
previously.)
Thanks for the review.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735554
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
It does look like I should add an empty %build section though based on the
rpmlint message. (I don't remember seeing that detailed of a message
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735554
--- Comment #8 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to ---
I'll also add a requires for systemd. Because it uses /usr/lib regardless of
arch, I don't want to try requiring the directory. Besides, for the forseable
future nothing else is going to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851859
Bug ID: 851859
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735554
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851848
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845673
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851848
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851848
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
--- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
In the %build phase you're adding -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to the CFLAGS. Is
this really needed for MinGW builds? IIRC this is a Linux-specific hack.
Yes,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
In the %build phase you're adding -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to the CFLAGS. Is
this really needed for MinGW builds? IIRC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851859
--- Comment #1 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com ---
Here is the koji build btw:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4423650
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833622
--- Comment #10 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Please set the alias to the package name, as is customary for mingw
packages, then I'd have found your review request...
This is news to me and I've been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
--- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
Good point. I should have looked at the build log.
New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-xz.spec
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749608
--- Comment #9 from Praveen Kumar kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com ---
Updated SPEC : http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/gnome-pie/gnome-pie.spec
SRPM :
http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/gnome-pie/gnome-pie-0.5.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
koji build :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851747
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com ---
This is the wikimedia maintained version... I wonder if the 3rd party one with
more features would be better to package?
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:DynamicPageList_(third-party)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851859
Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830387
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823641
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
OK, I think you've misused the
%..._scheme_obsolete
according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf
%gconf_schema_obsolete is used for schemas that this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749608
--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Build is failing on rawhide due to vala-devel, upstream still working on it.
Doesn't matter, currently we should concentrate our effort to f18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756776
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851859
Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842386
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754437
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851859
--- Comment #4 from Erik Schilling ablu.erikschill...@googlemail.com ---
Hello. Thanks a lot for replies.
I cannot upload stuff to fedorapeople.org. It says Permission denied
(publickey) (i uploaded my public key already earlier this day).
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731794
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851859
--- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de ---
Hi Erik,
your spec file looks almost fine now. There are a still a few things to be
addressed, though:
- When compiling C or C++ code, you must ensure that Fedora's %{optflags}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736870
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743370
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
BTW, are you still a packager? If not, add FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the Blocks:
field.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796640
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
*** Bug 796640 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807479
--- Comment #6 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Any progress here? I would like to take this for a full review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668204
--- Comment #13 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
The latest commits to Buzzbird's Git repo [1] are older than two years, that's
why we can safely assume that upstream is dead. I don't expect to get a working
package in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604
--- Comment #8 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Fixed
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmatekbd.spec
SRPM URL:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmatekbd-1.4.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
Description: A keyboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|844151 |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844151
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|847604 (libmatekbd) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849709
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|847604 (libmatekbd) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847643
--- Comment #10 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Fixed.
Fixed.
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmateweather.spec
SRPM URL:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmateweather-1.4.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847419
--- Comment #16 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
leigh scott 2012-08-19 06:12:53 PDT
There is still an outstanding issue, move this to -devel where it belongs
%{_datadir}/gir-1.0/PolkitGtkMate-1.0.gir
Done.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847901
--- Comment #11 from Steven Roberts strob...@strobe.net ---
I was wondering about bumping the the release number. I wasn't sure if should
bump inside of a review. I'm good with bumping the number more often.
Thank you for the sourceforge link.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842386
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@wolff.to
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851889
Bug ID: 851889
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851889
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||libmate
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851889
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||840149
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||851889 (libmate)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|mate-window-manager |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851890
Bug ID: 851890
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||851890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851890
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
