Dear WG,
I support WG adoption of this work. This work has had a long history and
has matured and I believe is ready to be progressed. I believe that
PCEP-LS would be valuable for operators and is not much change if using PCE
CC centralized SDN controller.
Thanks
Gyan
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at
Hi all,
For an experimental document, we have a decent level of support and no
objection. Every author has responded to the IPR check. The I-D is thus
adopted by the PCE WG.
@authors: Please, resubmit it as draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-00.
Thanks,
Julien
On 04/04/2024 18:18, Julien Meuric wrote:
GP is
not, hence I support (as author) the adoption of the draft.
Cheers,
Daniele
From: Pce mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of
Adrian Farrel
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 7:17 PM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com <mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com> ; pce@ietf.org
<mai
Hi all,
I support the WG adoption of the draft. This work started long time ago.
Currently there is the real requirement to export information in the scenario
related with IP + optical. They prefers PCEP other than BGP.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
李振斌 Li
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
Hi Julien,
I support the WG adoption of this work. It has been a long time since this work
was started. It is an useful experiment. It would be good if the WG adopts it
and progresses it
: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.orgSubject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Thanks, Julien. Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea, and two things help me believe we should adopt this: 1. As
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 7:17 PM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls
Thanks, Julien.
Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it
progress. But I have become used to the idea
Hi Julien,
I support the WG adoption of this work. It has been a long time since this work
was started. It is an useful experiment. It would be good if the WG adopts it
and progresses it further, especially helps with the IANA issues as Adrian
pointed out.
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Shuping
Thanks, Julien.
Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea, and two things help me believe we should adopt this:
1. As an Experiment, this can be tried out and we