>Keith said
> Okay then, which were less than perfect for you?
> B&W or color?
> Some eyes view colors which tend to focus at different points, making
> the image seem unclear or a teeny bit out of focus; but in turn view B&W
> as in plane and well focus
Very well done!
Nicely focussed.
But, still no answer to my query re wich lens was "best."
keith
Alan Chan wrote:
Here are some M135/3.5 shots. :-)
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_m13535
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Okay, David, which was it?
If your B&W (prints?) are v
Here are some M135/3.5 shots. :-)
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/pentax_m13535
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Okay, David, which was it?
If your B&W (prints?) are very sharp, as are your slides (I assume color?)
were both shot thru the same lens? Or different lenses?
Which was re
Both Keith.
I did a similar test with the 28-105 i bought from Joe W. in February.
The colour slides and the B&W were just great.Tack sharp. I shot some colour neg film
for
horse
passports and again they did not lookt quite right.
Therefore: i'm assuming its in the film or proccessing.I did fi
I did some test shots with my 150 and 135 f 3.5last year, with slide film and am very
happy with slide
and B&W results.
Either the mini lab i deal with or the film choices i use are not good,but my proofs
are
not that great with
any of my M lenses.To soft. The B&W and slides are very sharp.
I d
5, M50/1.4,
and an M85/2.
William in Utah
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 7:04 AM
Subject: Character of M135/3.5
> I picked one up yesterday @ Midwest.
> It was interesti
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Peter J. Alling wrote:
> I haven't exactly used the M 3.5 but I was happy with the K 3.5 until I
I too have the K135/3.5, but it's a different lens (and I like it very
much too, though I would like to try a K2.5-not takumar-to see if I
can hand-hold it for available light).
I haven't exactly used the M 3.5 but I was happy with the K 3.5 until I
picked up a K 2.3. Even
then it didn't seem too horribly slow especially by modern standards.
Based on what I've read it
should be a more than acceptable optic.
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I picked one up yesterday @ Midwes
8 matches
Mail list logo
