Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of ann sanfedele
Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:58
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: NYC View
p.s. ... I didn't see this link of John's earlier... with all the thumbnails in
googl
p.s. ... I didn't see this link of John's earlier... with all the
thumbnails in google.
Now I'm thinking the one (and only ) day I was in that spot the weather
hid the Empire StateBuilding...
I took my photo (darkside camera) in February, 2008... didn't have a lot
of photos on that card.. I used
I think I'm safe at this dostance: it's the glow every time Donald Trump lowers
his trousers - and that _is_ the sun.
> On 31 January 2016 at 23:10 "P.J. Alling" wrote:
>
>
> I could tell you but then I'd be required to kill myself.
>
> On 1/31/2016 4:20 PM, John wrote:
> > On 1/31/2016 3:33
I don't care much for the pose, but the photo is well lit.
It just doesn't really say "dance" to me. This says "DANCE", even if
it's not under the bridge
http://brooklynstreetbeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Isadora-Duncan-Photo-Credit-Richard-Termine-1024x787.jpg
On 1/31/2016 4:35 PM, Bob
I could tell you but then I'd be required to kill myself.
On 1/31/2016 4:20 PM, John wrote:
On 1/31/2016 3:33 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
talk about.
I know I'm going to regret asking, but you just lost me there. What
"event
Well that explains why I didn't see it back when I took mine :-)
ann
On 1/31/2016 4:34 PM, John wrote:
I think you're about a block too far back. It looks like you were
between Front St & York St.
I think you need to be between Water St & Front St to be able to frame
the Empire State Building
That was the point of Dan's original post- that he doubted it
ann
On 1/31/2016 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I didn't notice that they'd stuck the Empire State building in there.
On 1/31/2016 2:52 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I coul
I didn't notice that they'd stuck the Empire State building in there.
On 1/31/2016 2:52 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I could have
seen the Empire state fromthere it would have been in
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-F
Well.. ok I was a bit further back and using long lens... hmmm
ann
On 1/31/2016 2:52 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I could have
seen the Empire state fromthere it would have been in
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foo
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I could have seen
the Empire state fromthere it would have been in
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-New-York/i-RNcjf6K/A
ann
On 1/31/2016 1:20 PM, David Parsons wrote:
It's legit.
https://www.googl
On 31 Jan 2016, at 21:20, John wrote:
>
>> On 1/31/2016 3:33 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>> That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
>> talk about.
>
> I know I'm going to regret asking, but you just lost me there. What "event"?
Nobody talks about it.
B
>
>
>>
Well, that google images link certainly show that it's been done to death.
Nevertheless, at least someone has found a way to squeeze a few drops of bad
taste from the image of an enormous phallus penetrating a vesica piscis:
http://danceasart.photoshelter.com/image/IDj5jMvVsPnI
B
> On 31
I think you're about a block too far back. It looks like you were
between Front St & York St.
I think you need to be between Water St & Front St to be able to frame
the Empire State Building inside the bridge supports the way the
photographer in Dan's found image did. To get the angle right, you'
On 1/31/2016 3:33 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
talk about.
I know I'm going to regret asking, but you just lost me there. What "event"?
On 1/31/2016 1:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Call me sad, but I've just been on Google maps a
Plug these numbers into Google Maps search bar:
40.702820, -73.989601 & access street view.
DUMBO means Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass. I found that out
using TinEye to search and see if I could find the original of the image.
It doesn't look like the sun is setting in the north to me.
On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Further back gets the buildings in the right perspective, but the
>camera car shifted to the side so you can't see it in the street view.
More height would do it - original photograph standing on step ladder?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
talk about.
On 1/31/2016 1:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Call me sad, but I've just been on Google maps and then Google streetview. If
you put yourself on Washington Street between Water St and Front St you can see
that view,
Further back gets the buildings in the right perspective, but the
camera car shifted to the side so you can't see it in the street view.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>It's legit.
>
> Crucially the ESB is visible
On 1/31/2016 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's legit.
Crucially the ESB is visible in the middle arch, although I suggest a
bit further back than you location Dave
I think if you correct for the keystone effect and crop it correctly you
Call me sad, but I've just been on Google maps and then Google streetview. If
you put yourself on Washington Street between Water St and Front St you can see
that view, albeit without the somewhat mysterious phenomenon of the sun
apparently rising or setting in the north. But it's in a district
What's wrong is the proportion of the Empire state to the arch it is
under... also at this point more taller buildings are in the way
But it does make me want to grab my DA 55-300 and head to Brooklyn...
Maybe I'll do it tomorrow
ann
On 1/31/2016 2:59 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Well.. ok I was
Ann, is this view even possible?
http://themetapicture.com/photogenic-nyc-view/
or just another photoshop?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, ple
On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's legit.
Crucially the ESB is visible in the middle arch, although I suggest a
bit further back than you location Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
__
It's legit.
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7029836,-73.9895968,3a,75y,354.23h,95.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSteR_VZMWJQK9fsWUNG-qA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> Ann, is this view even possible?
> http://themetapicture.com/photogenic-nyc-view/
>
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> it's in a district called Dumbo, so what do I know?
LOL. MARK!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from th
25 matches
Mail list logo
