Subject: Re: PESO: Picket Point
Doug..OK I've given it a bit of depth and now I even imagine the
light
is straighter.
Jack
Comments?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=282
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
In a message dated 1/7/2008 1:22:58 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is about a 30 year old Ektar 125 ISO neg. Bruce's very dramatic
Blustery... shot reminded me of it. Am not offering it to be in
competition with ANY other shot of a lighthouse.
When I put it up on
Thanks, Marnie!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/7/2008 1:22:58 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is about a 30 year old Ektar 125 ISO neg. Bruce's very dramatic
Blustery... shot reminded me of it. Am not offering it to be in
competition
This is about a 30 year old Ektar 125 ISO neg. Bruce's very dramatic
Blustery... shot reminded me of it. Am not offering it to be in
competition with ANY other shot of a lighthouse.
When I put it up on my sight, I called it Picket Point (couldn't
resist) until someone emailed me with its correct
Jack,
I'd bet I've got an old slide or two of that light as well.
We drove from a family wedding in Santa Cruz back up Rt.1 thru Half Moon Bay.
I remember fields of carnations(?) overlooking the ocean.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 7, 2008 3:14 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is about a
I remember the profusion of ice plant, but it isn't that obvious in
this shot.
I'd swear that this film is beginning to suffer some old age color
change. As I remember, it has always been sleeved and kept in cool dark
storage.
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
I'd bet I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have the makings of a good composition here, but I'd rotate it
until the lighthouse is vertical. I might also increase midrange brightness
and contrast a bit.
A nice oldie.
-- Original message --
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL
Doug..OK I've given it a bit of depth and now I even imagine the light
is straighter.
Jack
Comments?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=282
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have the makings of a good composition here, but
Jack Davis wrote:
Doug..OK I've given it a bit of depth and now I even imagine the light
is straighter.
Jack
Comments?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=282
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have the makings of a
Much better. Nice shot.
Paul
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Doug..OK I've given it a bit of depth and now I even imagine the
light
is straighter.
Jack
Comments?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=282
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL
You were right. I kept creating a halo around the top section of the
light and sort of lost interest..I guess.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much better. Nice shot.
Paul
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Doug..OK I've given it a bit
I agree. All I needed was another opinion. ;)
Jack
--- Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Doug..OK I've given it a bit of depth and now I even imagine the
light
is straighter.
Jack
Comments?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=282
12 matches
Mail list logo