On 2/12/2012 9:53 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 2/12/2012 5:23 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:08 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Here's an experiment, take your K5 mount a 200mm or longer lens on
it put it into live view hold it at arms length and take a few
pictures. Then try a 300mm. C
On 2/12/2012 5:23 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:08 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Here's an experiment, take your K5 mount a 200mm or longer lens on it put it
into live view hold it at arms length and take a few pictures. Then try a
300mm. Compare your results to using the eye level
On Feb 11, 2012, at 3:08 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Here's an experiment, take your K5 mount a 200mm or longer lens on it put it
> into live view hold it at arms length and take a few pictures. Then try a
> 300mm. Compare your results to using the eye level view finder. Don't tell
> me you a
>
> It's one of those
> hold-it-out-at-arms-length-and-focus-using-the-little-TV-screen-on-the-
> back
> cameras.
>
> Gonna' take a lot of strength in your wrists to hold it up when you add
> the weight of a long lens hanging off the front.
>
I'm sure anyone who'd do that would have plenty of w
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
It's one of those
hold-it-out-at-arms-length-and-focus-using-the-little-TV-screen-on-the-back
cameras.
It's one of those
hold-it-out-at-arms-length-and-focus-using-the-little-TV-screen-on-the-back
cameras.
Gonna' take a lot of strength in your wrists to hold it up when you add
the weight of a long lens hanging off the front.
From: Tim Bray
Why do we know that long lenses will be problemati
I wonder about the appeal if the outer body was clear ?
-Original Message-
>From: William Robb
>Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
>
>On 10/02/2012 9:46 PM, Paul Ewins wrote:
>> Why do you ask? Everyone knows that how a camera looks is way more
On 10/02/2012 9:46 PM, Paul Ewins wrote:
Why do you ask? Everyone knows that how a camera looks is way more important
than how it handles or performs.
Apparently, that is exactly how the K-01s stylist feels about the
subject too.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
cept
it's aesthetics.
On 2/10/2012 9:49 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Yeah, but how does it perform photographically?
-Original Message-
From: William Robb
Sent: Feb 10, 2012 8:40 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
On 10/02/2012 12:
it perform photographically?
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>>
>>> From: William Robb
>>> Sent: Feb 10, 2012 8:40 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
>>>
&g
topher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Paul Ewins
Sent: February 10, 2012 2/10/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
Why do you ask? Everyone knows that how a camera looks is way more important
than how it handles or performs.
to discuss except it's aesthetics.
On 2/10/2012 9:49 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Yeah, but how does it perform photographically?
-Original Message-
From: William Robb
Sent: Feb 10, 2012 8:40 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
On 1
Why do you ask? Everyone knows that how a camera looks is way more important
than how it handles or performs.
On 11/02/2012, at 1:49 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Yeah, but how does it perform photographically?
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
Yeah, but how does it perform photographically?
-Original Message-
>From: William Robb
>Sent: Feb 10, 2012 8:40 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
>
>On 10/02/2012 12:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> It's the w
On 10/02/2012 12:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
The K-01 label mixes two type styles, and what's up
Quoting Steven Desjardins :
Brian is right:
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pentax_K2
(It's not that I doubted you, Brian; I just didn't believe you.)
That's OK. I probably have form for posting unsubstantiated suppositions...
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
While we're begin nostalgic, here' the MX:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-film-slr-discussion/61218-pentax-mx.html
I think that would make a great retro digital body. Look how small it
is compared to the k1000:
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pentax_MX
Oly will make a bunch of mon
Brian is right:
http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pentax_K2
(It's not that I doubted you, Brian; I just didn't believe you.)
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
>
>> It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atr
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
> It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
>
> The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
> available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
At least they spelled it right. In c
Quoting Tom C :
It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
The K-01 label mixes two type styles, and what's up with the goofy 'K'?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:22 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Maybe the designer started out in web design.
Harsh, dude, harsh.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li
Maybe the designer started out in web design.
On 2/10/2012 1:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
The K-0
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
> It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
>
> The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
> available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
Its a 16:9 body
Dave
>
> The K-01 la
It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
The K-01 label mixes two type styles, and what's up with the goofy 'K'?
Tom C.
--
PDML P
24 matches
Mail list logo
