Will Coleda schrieb:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This module is written in Perl 5 and is called in a program written in
Perl 5. In the work I've done in this project, I've taken the approach
to return values which I think is more Perlish,
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 19:54:57 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> This module is written in Perl 5 and is called in a program written in
> Perl 5. In the work I've done in this project, I've taken the approach
> to return values which I think is more Perlish, namely, if a subroutine
> completes and
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:54 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This module is written in Perl 5 and is called in a program written in
> Perl 5. In the work I've done in this project, I've taken the approach
> to return values which I think is more Perlish, namely, if a subrouti
This module is written in Perl 5 and is called in a program written in
Perl 5. In the work I've done in this project, I've taken the approach
to return values which I think is more Perlish, namely, if a subroutine
completes and does what you wanted it to, it should return a true value.
A bare ret
On Wed Jul 16 19:25:46 2008, coke wrote:
>
> Attached is a patch which passes all tests by removing the tests for
> the explicit true value of these methods.
>
Coke: I don't think we should accept this patch, for the simple reason
that I think the changes made to lib/Parrot/Ops2c/Utils.pm were b
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:53 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Jul 16 16:56:20 2008, coke wrote:
>> > I suspect that the merger/committer failed either to run 'perl
>> > Configure.pl --test' or 'make buildtools_tests' prior to 'make'.
>>
>> I can't remember the last time I
On Wed Jul 16 18:53:05 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So if you really think lib/Parrot/Ops2c/Utils.pm could be better
> designed while achieving the same functionality, have a go at it!
But in the short run I would recommend simply reverting to the last
prior version of the module. I sus
On Wed Jul 16 16:56:20 2008, coke wrote:
> > I suspect that the merger/committer failed either to run 'perl
> > Configure.pl --test' or 'make buildtools_tests' prior to 'make'.
>
> I can't remember the last time I ran these particular test targets, so
> that's easy (for me) to forgive.
>
(Well,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:31 PM, via RT James Keenan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by James Keenan
> # Please include the string: [perl #57026]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57026 >
>
>
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #57026]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57026 >
r29522 | bernha
10 matches
Mail list logo
